Skip to main content

Meandering Bob Marshall Chinese Wall

By
Speaking of the Bob, here's a view of the meandering Bob Marshall wilderness. Meander where you may.....

Comments

  1. avrdsAugust 8, 2009 at 4:51 PM

    The Bob Marshall Wilderness (or the Bob as it's called around here) was named for this man:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Marshall_(wilderness_activist)

    ReplyDelete
  2. James FergusonAugust 10, 2009 at 11:23 AM

    Thanks for dropping a comment in Vilnius Daze. Will try to do more with it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. avrdsAugust 10, 2009 at 5:44 PM

    Beautiful site. It seems like another world from mine.

    Someone posted a link to the State of Jones earlier. I watched an interesting discussion yesterday on BookTV with the authors. Got to see some of the controversy surrounding the writing of history to support an upcoming (maybe) movie, using a historian from Harvard and a journalist. Funny mix.

    Still, sounds like a fascinating story -- union soldiers and sympathizers living deep in the heart of the South. They did give a sense of how, after the "20 negro rule," the Civil War in the South became a rich man's war in defense of their livelihood, sending poor men to die like the "hero" of the book Newton Knight (much like Roosevelt's father paid someone to fight for him).

    They argue that the South in the end won the war because they were able to maintain their "way of life" and they controlled the history of why the war was fought.

    Here's the book: http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl/9780385525930.html

    And a link to the video:

    http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=288250-1

    ReplyDelete
  4. James FergusonAugust 10, 2009 at 5:57 PM

    Sounds like a very interesting book, av. Blight also came to the conclusion that the South won the peace because it was better able to shape the national consensus of the events. Reunion won out over Race. One can't help reading of that period with a sense of sadness at how the Republicans let their gains slip away. It must have been a very bitter pill for the Radicals to swallow, not to mention the Freedmen, who found themselves once again in a state of indentured servitude.

    ReplyDelete
  5. avrdsAugust 10, 2009 at 6:11 PM

    I have mixed feelings about reading it since it so clearly tracks a movie script and apparently counters at least some of the scholarly work originally written about this county (although they do a pretty good job countering that in the BookTV discussion).

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/30/movies/30jones.html

    Still, interesting period of history.

    And yes, that's the lasting impression I have of Blight -- about how the South controlled the nation's memory of why the war was fought.

    I also think that's why historians have gone out of their way to emphasize the other side of the story -- to counter that "winning of the peace." But that's a discussion we've had before.....

    ReplyDelete
  6. avrdsAugust 11, 2009 at 6:47 PM

    This is a great introduction to Obama's mother.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/11/opinion/11dove.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. James FergusonAugust 13, 2009 at 2:19 PM

    I see this is the anniversary of Cortez' victory over Montezuma. I well remember the great discussion we had on "The Conquest."

    ReplyDelete
  8. avrdsAugust 13, 2009 at 5:19 PM

    And in a total meander, NY -- and Rick -- I finished season 2 of slings and arrows, which focused on Macbeth. If you are at all interested in theater and Shakespeare, what a great series.

    In each series they try to integrate some of the play into the day-to-day story. The argument on stage about whether or not to bring an actual bloody ghost to the table while the director argues with a real (invisible) ghost is brilliant.

    I have found season 3 on youtube as well so it's on to Lear in 10 minute increments. It's worth it. I may even buy the series again if I can't find the first one I bought...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more