Skip to main content

The Debate on the Constitution 1787-1788

By


This is a link to the first volume of Bernard Bailyn's massive The Debate on the Constitution, published by the Library of America.  The two volumes weigh in at nearly 2400 pages and cover a tremendous number of recorded speeches, including those by "Antis" like Elbridge Gerry, Patrick Henry and Melancton Smith.  Surprised Maier didn't mention the two volumes in her introduction.

Comments

  1. avrdsMarch 10, 2011 at 4:08 PM

    I thought she said this is what made her work possible, or is that a different unedited version that has just recently come out?

    I forgot to watch the Sunday interview with her, but there is a short (well, 1 hour) presentation at the Library of Congress available now on C-Span:

    http://www.booktv.org/Watch/11996/Ratification+The+People+Debate+the+Constitution+17871788.aspx

    Sorry -- I stalled out in New York, which is ironically the most interesting to me. I may pick it back up again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. TripplerMarch 11, 2011 at 3:42 AM

    I'd love to read that two volume set. But with my poor memory, I'd forget everything in a New York minute.

    It is so good to see that people are interested in this subject. Consider how Tea Baggers and other right wingers twist and distort 'original intent'' to suit their own selfish purposes. Then read books of these types and those critics become so easy to defeat in a debate because the right wingers are always so wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  3. James FergusonMarch 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM

    Maier mentioned a series of books put out by the original states that encompass all (or most) of the newspaper and other written accounts of the ratification ebates, including the speeches. I think she said at the time of her research, five states had done this, which made her work a lot easier. But, the bulk of the speeches she refers to are contained within the Bailyn books.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more