Skip to main content

Don't Speak Ill of the Dead



We tend to give persons a pass when they are terminally ill or dead out of respect, but do these two men deserve any respect?

Mitch went out of his way to stack the Supreme Court, first by refusing to consider Pres. Obama’s nomination for Antonin Scalia’s vacant seat in 2016, despite his death coming in February with 11 months remaining in Obama’s second term. Then by stuffing the court with Amy Coney Barrett when Ruth Bader Ginsburg suddenly passed away in September of 2020. You can say this was just shrewd politics, but Mitch tried to justify his earlier position on Scalia by citing the “Biden rule,” and then turned right around and broke it when he saw a golden opportunity to have a 6–3 advantage on the Supreme Court. We all know what happened next.

Lindsey is an equally smarmy character always sucking up to whoever is in power. For years, he was given a pass because of his close relationship to John McCain, whom many considered a man of great moral character. Lindsey hoped to have some of that moral character rub off on him but when he chose to latch onto Trump to save his Senate seat in South Carolina, you knew this guy would stoop to anything to stay in Congress. Not like he did anything noteworthy, but he was always buzzing around, acting like he was a major voice, when the vast majority of senators, Republican and Democrat, couldn’t stand him, and for good reason. This was a guy who would abandon you at the drop of a hat, a red hat in this case. Yet, his sudden passing seems to have brought out nothing but praise for this chameleon.

Sorry, I’m not buying it. He’s for something or against something only as long as it suits his personal interests. Some would like to claim he was the Ukraine whisperer in Donald’s ear. He even visited Kyiv shortly before his untimely death. If so, it doesn’t seem like Trump listened to him. For the past year-and-a-half, Trump has made it as hard as possible for Ukraine to gain the upper hand, blocking shipments of much needed Patriot and Tomahawk missiles, holding up aid packages and persistently saying that Ukraine should surrender to Russia in the face of overwhelming odds. Now that the tide is turning in the long-running war, Donald seems more inclined to consider Ukraine’s position but I don’t think it is because of Lindsey. Trump just doesn’t want to be associated with a loser, which is what Russia appears today.

Let’s remember that this is the same Donald Trump who gave out Lindsey’s phone number during the 2016 presidential campaign and demeaned him every opportunity he got.

“This guy Lindsey Graham, he’s one of the dumbest human beings I have ever seen, ” Trump said at a rally in Bluffton. “He starts hitting me, saying vicious things, ends up with 0%. He left in disgrace.”

Now here he is offering a eulogy to his dear friend, a rather guarded one in which he concluded, “other than being tired, he was fine, a quick end, and maybe that’s not the worst way to go.” Donald had talked to Lindsey on the phone after his return from Ukraine.

Mitch, however, just keeps hanging on. He had surprisingly become Trump’s nemesis upon his return to the White House in 2025, voting against key legislation, including the SAVE Act, which Trump believes is the only way Republicans can avoid a slaughter at the polls this Fall. With Mitch bedridden, Donald thought he had the votes to carry the legislation across the line in the Senate but he lost a key vote in Graham. This sort of made Democrats forget about all the things Mitch did to stack the Supreme Court and federal courts with Federalist appointees. Mitch is no friend of the Democrats. This is an issue of states rights for him and he doesn’t believe the federal government should intercede on voting regulations.

Besides, Mitch felt the Republicans had the Senate locked up no matter how the midterms went, especially with Pennsylvania Democratic Sen. Fetterman siding with Republicans on most issues important to them. The Dems need to flip five seats to gain the upper hand and the electoral math simply doesn’t favor them. The SAVE Act was a waste of time as far he was concerned.

While Mitch relished Machiavellian politics, Lindsey was supposedly more pragmatic. He sought concessions to get bipartisan bills through a deeply divided Senate. He loved to put himself at the vanguard of these efforts as if he was “saving” these bills. In the end, he would always fall back on the party line, especially if he was in danger of losing his seat.

This was the case with the health care bill he and a handful of Republicans tried to push through Congress in 2017 as an alternative to “Obamacare” that Republicans were determined to repeal now that Trump was president. In this way he hoped to swing back three Republicans who were against repealing the Affordable Care Act, among them John McCain. It was a typical empty bill Lindsey was proposing, yet it blew up in his face. The folks back home in Trumpistan, also known as South Carolina, thought he was pitching another version of “Obamacare” and threatened to tar and feather him, or at least “primary” him in the next election. Just like that he dropped the bill.

Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. This can be said of both Mitch and Lindsey. Mitch had long ruled the Republican roost in the Senate, turning over the reins to John Thune in 2024, when his health had become an issue. No one knew the system and how to subvert it better than Mitch did. Lindsey was always a small but vocal player, who tried desperately to move out from behind the shadow of John McCain, who had mentored him for years. Sadly, it didn’t seem like he learned much. Say what you will about McCain, he stuck to his convictions. Lindsey didn’t seem to have any convictions.

So here we are with one gone and the other on life support, bringing the Republican senate majority down to 51. If you count Fetterman, 52. That means they have only a three-vote margin of error without having to enlist the aid of VP Vance to break a tie. That’s a mighty thin margin, especially in an effort to save the SAVE Act. Trump made enemies of John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana) by endorsing their Republican opponents in recent primaries. However, Trump won’t sign any legislation, not even a bipartisan housing bill that passed both chambers, until Congress passes his SAVE Act. He thinks this is the only way to spare the United States from a “Communist” revolution in November, a fate worse than the World Wars and 9/11 put together.

The only reason Lindsey was for this voter ID bill is because he thought it would save his ass in South Carolina. Polls had him barely ahead of his Democratic challenger, Annie Andrews, with many MAGA faithful showing no interest in his candidacy. They would stay home before voting for Lindsey again. He thought the ID bill might offset his losses by discouraging Democratic voters to come to the polls. This is his type of “pragmatism.” Oddly enough, he might have done Trump a big favor. Now that he is gone, the Republicans can nominate someone else in his place who may fire MAGA voters back up.

One can’t even imagine how much these two senators are loathed in their home sates. McConnell barely survived Alison Lundergan Grimes back in 2014 and then only because she self-destructed in the waning days of the campaign by coming down to the right of the conservative Kentucky senator on many key issues. She was supposed to be the progressive Democrat.

Lindsey has won multiple elections by default in South Carolina as the conservative opposition to his candidacy has been horribly divided, no more so than in 2014 when a host of candidates ran against him, including a very young Nancy Mace, which effectively split the opposition.

In death and near death, Lindsey and Mitch are more fondly remembered. Even Hunter Biden had this emotional tribute, choosing not to remember when Lindsey led the Senate investigation into his and his father’s work in Ukraine, which led Joe Biden, who had considered Lindsey a longtime friend, to opin “I’m just embarrassed by what you’re doing for you. I mean, my Lord.”

There really is nothing to fondly remember about Lindsey Graham, nor will there be for Mitch McConnell when he finally gives up the ghost. These are two men whose ruthless style of politics was all about their greedy pursuit of power and fulfilling a conservative corporate agenda.

No tears shed here.

Comments

  1. No - neither one deserves any respect and I think that it is perfectly acceptable to speak ill the dead (or the possibly/hopefully dead in Mitch's case).

    Backtracking a few years to recall the death of John McCain, there were a number of core beliefs that he held that I would never have been able to agree with, but I will always have the utmost respect for the man. I'll always appreciate what he said about Obama during the campaign - "No ma'am. He's a decent family man, citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues, and that's what this campaign is all about."

    I believe that Mitch McConnell is personally responsible for the death of the Republican Party - he had several opportunities to drive a stake through the heart of the MAGA movement, but he pulled his head into his turtle shell and let the opportunity slip away. History should not be kind to him.

    And the world wonders how Lindsey Graham could have so completely lost his way. At the time, I have no doubt that the majority of his fellow Republican senators would have agreed when Graham said that Joe Biden was "as good a man as God ever created" and "the nicest person I think I’ve ever met in politics."

    He also said "If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed... and we will deserve it." He also called Trump a "jackass" after Trump questioned John McCain's status as a war hero. He described Trump as a "kook," "crazy," and "unfit for office" followed by a "race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot" who would do irreparable damage to the Republican Party.

    But like a moth being drawn too closely to the flame of power, he utterly destroyed himself by becoming one of Trump's most ardent admirers and supporters. One is left to wonder what sort of dirty laundry/kompromat Trump must have been holding over Miss Lindsey's head.

    And then one after another, the majority of Graham's fellow Republican senators fell in line to support "the Great Leader". Marco Rubio (aka "Little Marco) - boy did he ever drink the Kool aid and get lost down Trump's rabbit hole. If I were a politician and an opponent said anything demeaning about me, that would be it - he or she would never have my support and I certainly would not be a willing partner in that person's future administration. Indeed, how could "Miss G" have hopped onto the tRump Train after "The Donald" said "he was the dumbest human being I have ever seen".

    Lindsey Graham could have remained as a voice of reason and someone with the moral courage to speak truth to power. He probably wouldn't have lasted long in the world of MAGA politics, but he would have kept his respectability intact. Ultimately, he failed completely and sold his soul in order to remain close to power. And once again, history will not be kind to him.

    So, good riddance to both of them - a modern day version of Dante Alighieri's Devine Comedy would hopefully have them sitting beside each other in the ninth circle of hell. And I'm left to wonder who will be chewing on them for eternity.

    SRBGB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think they so much drank the Kool Aid as saw their political future was tied to MAGA, leaving them no choice but to embrace this Klown. Marco got his first term of office purely because of the disdain expressed by Florida Republicans when Charlie Crist had the audacity to embrace Obama. The former governor didn't stand a chance in the primaries. He tried to run again as governor the next election, as he had given up a second term to run for senator, only to lose to the human snake, Rick Scott. Crist is a decent guy, a centrist, not an ideologue, yet no room for these guys in the Republican Party anymore. McCain was lucky to withstand the broadsides, earning him the enmity of Trump and his minions. Murkowski survives in Alaska. But, these are/were the exceptions. This is a party completely overrun by populists and yet they cry because the "Democratic Socialists" are winning elections. These "communists" are winning elections for the same reason they did, they don't represent the status quo. So, here we are with an ever more deeply divided country. Anyway, I agree, good riddance. Never liked either one of them and see no reason to offer kind words.

      Delete
  2. I am, for the most part, sick and disgusted by the majority of US politics as well as both political parties as well as the extreme ends of both parties. Presently, I refer to myself as being a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. Early on in my career, I voted a straight Republican ticket as it was my perception that they were "pro-military" and would always have my back (like taking care of our war-weary veterans). My entire career was spent in the service of the military (both in uniform and as a civilian, so I guess I was initially looking for a party to ally myself with).

    But I slowly came to realize that that feeling of support was a carefully crafted deception and I began to work my way over to the side of the Democrats. It all began to feel like my life in the military wasn't so much about keeping the world safe for democracy as much as it was protecting the M.I.C. that Eisenhower had warned us about.

    And we also had to fight the commies at every available opportunity (even though it was clear that the Stalinist-flavored communism was doomed to fail). Take a quick historical tour of post-WWII world conflicts and you'll find the US had our fingers in just about every single one of them. We have supported a whole slew of fascist dictators (Salazar, Franco, Pinochet, Marcos, The Shah, Trujillo, Suharto, Somoza, et al.), we overthrew Mohammad Mossadegh in Iran, Salvador Allende in Chile and Jacobo Árbenz in Guatemala, and further with a host of assists in other countries. And to what end I would ask??? But that's a multi-faceted and extremely complicated answer and better served to discuss over a nice single malt scotch in a smokey bar on the Isle of Skye. And I'll openly admit that I'm probably too focused on armchair refereeing past US history (oh, but it's so much fun!!!).

    And then there was Iran (oh my....the hostages....whatever did we do to deserve that), so then we must support Iraq, and then 9/11 happened, so we must attack Saudi Arabia - opps, I meant Iraq (WMDs??) and Afghanistan (Saudis hiding in caves....and then holed up in Pakistan). Then multiple attacks against Iran and our continued unquestioning support of Israel in their mission to commit genocide - opps, oh no, I meant to "defend themselves".

    And if several recent US presidents that come to mind suffered from the "regrets" of Lady McBeth, they would be washing their hands for decades to come screaming "Out, damned spot! out, I say!" And I'll give you one guess to name the one US President that did not engage the US Military in some foreign involvement during his presidency?

    And now I'll switch over to domestic politics. How many times have we heard the Republican Party screaming about the tax and spend Democrats? That old mantra always sounded like it was being directed at some hillbilly dumbass that was lazy, jobless and living on public assistance, but was always somehow pissed off at the Mexicans because "Dey took err jerbs" (as per South Park). And Holy F#@king Hannah - look at the recent Republican administrations ran up the huge deficits and added massively to the National Debt!!

    And to conclude - Marco Rubio and my reference to drinking the Kool-Aid - aka "the blind acceptance of a foolish ideology with unquestioning obedience to a leader or mission". Marco - how about growing a pair of BALLS and considering the needs of the state that elected you to the US Senate. Nope - Marco is just another in a long line of war hawks that think nothing of putting our US military into harm's way without a clear exit strategy. And screw Florida politics and politicians - look at what has become of our Santa Rosa beaches that we used to have unfettered access to in our teen years.

    And with that, I've said enough. I'm currently sitting alongside the beautiful Columbia River enjoying a lovely cocktail and watching the river flow past my campsite. Life is good ... but I don't think I like people in general any longer. And that's really sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like you, I came to the Democratic party via the Republican party. I guess I started leaning left with Jesse Jackson. He was the only guy who seemed to make any sense during the 84 and 88 elections but I wasn't ready to go that far at the time. By 92 I was deeply disillusioned with both parties. Couldn't stand Clinton, thought Bush had missed a golden opportunity, so I voted for Perot, mostly out of frustration.

      Clinton was a huge disappointment on every level. Such a weak character and president. The Monica Lewinsky scandal was just semen on the cake. The more I think about it, this guy paved the way for Trump with his total lack of moral character and political opportunism, yet many Democrats still sing his praises. Why? I have no idea. He failed completely other than to make Democrats swallow Republican initiatives like the notorious crime bill, which he was later forced to admit was catastrophic. No health care bill. No attempt to turn the "peace dividends" into something positive. His lasting legacy was to balance the budget two successive years.

      I was about as excited of Gore as I was Dubya. I could care less. Didn't vote at all that election. In retrospect, Gore may have kept us out of the wars but then probably not. He was a bit of a hawk himself, although having turned over a new green leaf, which struck me as very phony at the time. Now he is being hailed as some sort of environmental guru.

      I was happy when Kerry came along. I really thought he would win the election. I was in Seattle at the time, seeing if I could pull off relocating the family, but the economy was already slowing down and there wasn't much call for architects. I picked up a couple of contract projects and then returned to Vilnius. So disappointed Kerry lost. Came down to Ohio in this case. The old Copperheads. Why these Midwest states turned Republican I will never know, especially since Republican policies did nothing for them.

      Obama was like a breathe of fresh air. I really thought we had turned a new leaf as a nation but then along comes the Tea Party, Birthers and Donald Trump. What had once been fringe was now loud and obnoxious and ready to take over the country. Obama didn't go far enough in my opinion but at least he had put the US on the right path. Now look at us. It's embarrassing. Almost impossible to have a conversation with our Lithuanian friends about politics as they can't believe Americans could be so stupid as to elect this guy twice.

      So much resentment comes bubbling up, as the US and its Western European allies had abandoned Eastern Europe during WWII, forcing it to live under the Soviet shadow for 45 years. Oddly enough, many Lithuanians are conservative, largely in response to FDR's Yalta, but they can no longer stomach Trump. It's just revolting how this guy coddles Putin. That Alaska summit was the last straw. All they want is for the US to drop its pathetic attempts at negotiations, as all they are doing is fucking things up in Europe.

      Rubio is a sad joke. You would think this guy would have a ton of resentment toward Trump, but here he is trying to drive a wedge through European politics at his recent summit. European leaders thought Marco was the only adult left in the WH but not anymore. The Trump administration is promoting the same far-right candidates in Europe as is Putin, making everyone here think they signed a modern-day version of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact with plans to carve up Europe similar to Cold War lines.

      It's so frustrating. I can well imagine how nice it is to have that peaceful feeling along the mighty Columbia. I remember driving through the Blue Mountains in Oregon years ago in my Ford Ranger with a camper shell and was seriously tempted just to stake out a little piece of land just for myself. So beautiful, so peaceful, just nature in all its glory. A lot of that here too. Some weekends, Daina and I just head to the woods to pick mushrooms and berries, takes our minds off all this nonsense.

      Cheers! Here's a Lagavulin to enjoy those quiet moments.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

The People Debate the Constitution

As Pauline Maier describes in Ratification , there was no easy road in getting the Constitution ratified.  After 10 years of living together as a loosely knit confederation, a few forward thinking men decided that the Articles of Confederation no longer worked and it was time to forge a Constitution.  Washington would not go until he could be assured something would come of the convention and that there would be an august body of gentlemen to carry the changes through.  But, ultimately Maier describes it was the people who would determine the fate of the new Constitution. This is a reading group for Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution 1787-1788 .  The book has been well received by fellow historians like Jack Rakove , among others.  Maier has drawn from a wealth of research piecing together a story that tells the arduous battle in getting the Constitution ratified.  A battle no less significant than that Americans fought for independence.