"I mean, had Andrew Jackson been a little later, you wouldn't have had the Civil War. He was a very tough person, but he had a big heart. He was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War. There's no reason for this." Leave it to the Donald to give us a revisionist view of the Civil War. It is relatively safe to say that Jackson would have been against the Civil War given his position on South Carolina's nullification bid , but the two events were thirty years apart. This is what happens when you are spoon-fed little morsels of history from Stephen Bannon. I was wondering where all this interest in Jackson came from? It probably stems from the decision reached last year to put Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill. Trump questioned this decision during the transition and one of his first acts as President was to prominently hang a portrait of Old Hickory in the Oval Office. This is a very ...