Skip to main content

Walter Lippmann: Public Opinion

By

Walter Lippmann summed up the value of Public Opinion long ago.  This book was published in 1921.  Not surprisingly he recalls Plato's Allegory of a Cave, long a favorite of conservative pundits, as if they see the "real truth," and Democrats like interpreting the shadows on the wall.  I haven't read this book, but it does look interesting.  Lippmann is one of those figures who seemed to straddle the political divide.  He seemed to support government taking a more active role in society and supported Roosevelt's New Deal, but over time developed a position of "moderate detachment."

Comments

  1. robertwhelanSeptember 1, 2010 at 12:21 AM

    I'mso old I remember Lippmann's twice weekly column in THE NEW YORRK HERALD TRIBUNE _Tuesday and Thursday).It was reqyured reading in my History class. I learned a lot from that man.He helped form my thoughts. He was a true conservative, along with William F. Buckley---both would throw up at the thought of a Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck. What a perversion of true conservative thought.

    I've spent some time re-learning computer skills today--so this willbe it for the day.

    ReplyDelete
  2. robertwhelanSeptember 1, 2010 at 12:32 AM

    I read PUBLIC OPINION in high school and a few years ago picked up INTERPETATIONS 1933-1935--filed with his colums covering the period including the rise of Hitler. I haven't read it--but will get my caretaker to read me some of the columns.

    ReplyDelete
  3. James FergusonSeptember 3, 2010 at 8:35 AM

    There was a time Conservatism had a strong intellectual voice, but that seems gone today. I suppose the anti-intellectualism fueled by Nixon and McCarthy pretty much laid the ground work for the anti-intellectualism that dominates the Republican Party today.

    Dubya was quite boastful of his mediocre grades in high school and college and did his best to promote himself as a "good old boy." I think a lot of the current Republican anti-intellectualism stems from the absorption of former Dixiecrats and religious conservatives into the GOP, who tend to see the world in explicitly black and white terms.

    I think George Will and Bill Safire are the last of the American Conservative intellectuals. Ron Paul would like to claim the mantle head, although not a young man himself. His recent books supposedly served as the inspiration for the Tea Party, and he initially endorsed the movement, but even he has to be chagrined by Beck and Palin crashing the Party.

    ReplyDelete
  4. TripplerSeptember 3, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    Possibly, Walter Lippmann's greatest writing:

    http://books.google.com/books?id=-E4WFG-G30sC&printsec=frontcover&dq=A+preface+to+morals+by+lippmann&source=bl&ots=aWkKDhEh1Z&sig=jIPwLVc-HhhES8zhoPdQs3VfR30&hl=en&ei=4wyBTLCdLo2-sAP5t4j3Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

    ''A Preface to Morals''

    Today's conservatives and liberals should give it a thorough reading.

    This reminds me of a thought I had a while ago: liberals used to cite the Bible for much of their socio-political thoughts. If they fail at winning in politics today it is largely because of their failure to use the best weapon they had in the past.

    ReplyDelete
  5. James FergusonSeptember 5, 2010 at 11:42 AM

    I guess I should have put Safire in the past tense.

    It seems like you can't be any kind of politician these days without copiously referencing, if not quoting, the Bible, but somehow the Republicans have managed to co-opt the evangelical strain of politics these days. What hurts them is their whiter than white attitude which comes across as a throwback to the Jim Crow days. Not helping them one bit with religious Latin voters who tend to be social conservatives, except in Florida where they put up pretty boy Marco Rubio.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more