Skip to main content

The Cradle Will Rock  is mentioned in the opening chapter of  Bob Dylan in America.  In this chapter, Wilentz tries to capture the spirit of the Popular Front in America at the time, which many of the persons who were involved in the play were a part of, as noted in this book reference.  Marc Blitzstein originally conceived the play for the Federal Theater Project, but Hallie Flanagan pulled the plug when pressure mounted against the production.  Orson Welles and John Houseman stepped in with their own money and saved the play from obscurity.  In 1999, a movie was made that dramatized the events surrounding the play.

Comments

  1. Thanks so much for expanding into this subject, gintaras, but I dare not get started on the subject of Blitzstein, Houseman, Welles, Flanagan and the Federal Theater and collateral issues such as the appropriate role of gov't in funding the arts and how to get it without censorship when art criticizes gov't. itself, not to mention private patronage for the arts with its own issues as illustrated by the Diego Rivera vs. Rockefeller story Robbins tried to tell in "The Cradle Will Rock" movie, and as an aside within an aside, did I say how much I enjoyed and recommend Kingsolver's "The Lacuna"?

    Uh-oh, it seems a certain kind of free association posting is catching. I'll let up, but thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'll have to check out the movie, NYT. I find that era fascinating.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sounds like a very interesting movie. I just watched a clip of it on youtube and will have to watch the rest of it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I watched the movie last night and enjoyed it. The acting was a bit over the top at times, especially the depictions of Welles and Houseman, but I thought Tim Robbins did a great job of capturing a feeling for the era. Really liked Bill Murray's sad-faced ventriloquist. Summed up the end of Vaudeville perfectly.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Glad you watched it, Gintaras. I re-watched it after the play was mentioned in the book and enjoyed it as much the second time as I did the first. Thought they did a nice job using the play as a backdrop to the story of the play. Entertaining polemic.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...