''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
Interesting about the Washington name.
ReplyDeleteThe latest poll of the top 10 presidents. You'll never guess who came in first:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/146183/Americans-Say-Reagan-Greatest-President.aspx
Surprise! Surprise! But, I imagine after the glow of his centennial wears off, he will slip back down the list.
ReplyDeleteAs Chris Matthews quipped, you are supposed to _think_ before answering the question. It's like asking what was the best movie of all time, and answering whatever movie you last saw. Doesn't show much thinking on the part of the US public.
ReplyDeleteThe war for Washington:
ReplyDeletehttp://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/the-war-for-george-washington/
North or South?
Reagan has been so much in the news lately that such a response to a poll is expected. I have to wonder how many Americans could name more than five presidents without prodding. It is not like Gallup asked historians who the best president was.
ReplyDeleteWow! Chernow just won a very big award for his bio:
ReplyDeletehttp://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/chernow-wins-history-prize-for-washington-biography/
I suppose at some point I will have to read Chernow's Washington.
ReplyDeleteIt is very good. Much better than the last Morris, but then he is covering Washington's entire life. (I still haven't finished, but intend to since it is really easy to read-- just long)
ReplyDeleteStill, he is smitten with Washington to the point that (again) I wish he could have been a little more objective. That's the part that's interesting about the AHA endorsement of the book. It is a significant, almost grand writing achievement (based on printed sources -- not archival research) but not what I would consider great "history."