Standard and Poor's recent decision to downgrade the US credit rating is a historic one. The US had enjoyed a AAA rating since 1917, which not only spans the Great Depression, but the Big Recession of the 70s as well, not to mention the collapse of the S&L's in the 80s and the banking meltdown of 2008. So why now?
S&P would like the public to believe it is non-partisan, but it seems it was first challenging the White House back in April, according to this article from Business Insider, which very clearly shows which side of the political divide S&P sits on,
The S&P was much less optimistic when they reported that "we believe the Democratic Party, which controls the Senate, remains committed to its spending priorities and is unlikely to agree to further tax cuts, particularly for the highest-income earners, meaning Democrats are unlikely to accept the Ryan proposal without substantial modification."
I see stocks predictably took a nosedive on the S&P report, despite the report being largely discredited in the press. Seems traders will use any excuse to sell. Sometimes you wonder how much of this is orchestrated.
ReplyDeleteAs Paul Krugman points out in Today's New York Times, "America’s large budget deficit is, after all, primarily the result of the economic slump that followed the 2008 financial crisis. And S. & P., along with its sister rating agencies, played a major role in causing that crisis, by giving AAA ratings to mortgage-backed assets that have since turned into toxic waste." I guess the S. & P. might argue that it has learned its lesson, but I'm a little skeptical.
ReplyDeleteNo, this rating "downgrade" strikes me as purely political.
ReplyDelete