Skip to main content

Lying About the Past



Probably would have made for a better April 1 lead-in post, but sadly there are a lot of folks taking David Barton seriously.  He is popping up everywhere these days.  Here he is from last May using The Daily Show to spread his views.  Barton is apparently the one responsible for all those bogus founding fathers quotes being spread over Facebook and other Internet sharing websites.  When called on these unconfirmed quotations, Barton said in his defense that they were "consistent" with the "views" of the Founding Fathers.  His recent book on Jefferson is garnering a lot of attention.  An historian tries to sum up the Barton Factor, after watching the interview with Jon Stewart.  This sounds like the Dunning School all over again.

Comments

  1. This is Orwellian in the extreme. "Exposing the Myths" by creating new ones.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hopefully, he will go the way of Erich von Daniken.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I posted a review at amazon, http://www.amazon.com/The-Jefferson-Lies-Exposing-Believed/dp/1595554599/ref=cm_cr-mr-title, under James Ferguson, and to my surprise it has gotten mostly favorably hits. You can find out Barton's views through his website. But, what worries me is that a book like this is generating so much interest.

    It is #3 in American history sales at amazon. I'm sure it is conservative block buying, but nevertheless it is an inordinate amount of sales for what is a piece of tripe.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Seems the Bartonites are now out in full force, spamming my review with their posts. I've made a few rebuttals, but it amazes me how much stock persons are putting in the "Jefferson Bible." This was something he did for himself and shared with close friends, yet to read Barton, Jefferson wanted to disseminate this Bible among the Indians, referring to an offhand comment by his great-grand daughter, Sarah, in 1895, the year the condensed "Bible" was eventually published.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you're curious, someone was kind enough to post the first two chapters in Google Books,

    http://books.google.lt/books?id=Illk_AVwywEC&pg=PT6&lpg=PT6&dq=david+barton+use+of+footnotes&source=bl&ots=IB7hE4ti11&sig=szRql01KV-uup8TVzE7JlaNyVzc&hl=lt&sa=X&ei=dXyVT6WwFYPZtAaelNWkBA&sqi=2&ved=0CEMQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=david%20barton%20use%20of%20footnotes&f=false

    Barton's chapter (Lie #2) on the founding of UVA is a real doozy. I think old Tom would have gotten a big chuckle out of this one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I never would have imagined that my review for this silly book would generate nearly 500 helpful hits and over 160 comments. I figured my negative review would have ended up at the bottom of the pile, yet it remains on the lead page. I found out more about the "Jefferson Bible" than I cared to know.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I see that Chris Rodda has gone through the painstaking process of sorting out the lies by the religious right regarding the founding of America and its "fathers,"

    http://books.google.lt/books?id=TJoANNZGtfUC&pg=PP1&dq=Liars+For+Jesus:+The+Religious+Right%27s+Alternate+Version+of+American+History+Vol.+1&hl=en&sa=X&ei=28m0T5b-M47CtAaF8PXjAg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Liars%20For%20Jesus%3A%20The%20Religious%20Right's%20Alternate%20Version%20of%20American%20History%20Vol.%201&f=false

    excellent chapter on the Northwest Ordinance.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You're probably the only sane voice out there! And the only one willing to even look at something like this. I can't even bring myself to look at the chapters you linked.

    Have you ever thought of doing this professionally? You would be a great reviewer.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I've thought about it, but don't know where to look. Any suggestions?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I would go to the book editors of those reviews you read and send them a query.

    You might want to start with a current book or two most closely aligned with your background (say architectural history or something relevant/current to Lithuania and environs -- that's a real advantage you have) and go from there.

    The other strategic option would be to go with professional journals first, and then use those as part of your portfolio. They are always looking for book reviewers. You could easily do three or four reviews in different venues to get started. I think it's a great idea.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks av. Will send out some inquiries. I just have to carve out time to read more books. Not enough hours in the day. Of course, if I get paid for it that's a different story ; )

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think you should try! Journals don't pay, but they are a good way to get started. And just go with the books you are reading anyway. For example, I approached a western history journal to review the Brinkley book on TR which they carried in the next issue. Sometimes it takes awhile, but they are always looking for reviewers.

    I also volunteered once to review Obama's book, for a special journal issue on religion and politics, but didn't get that one ...!

    Are you on H-Net? They often send out queries looking for reviewers.

    ReplyDelete
  13. No, but will do so. Thanks again, av. Found this interesting site through one of the links I posted earlier,

    http://usreligion.blogspot.com/

    Seems even tempered. Sent my thoughts on Barton to the blog editor.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro

Dylan in America

Whoever it was in 1969 who named the very first Bob Dylan bootleg album “Great White Wonder” may have had a mischievous streak. There are any number of ways you can interpret the title — most boringly, the cover was blank, like the Beatles’ “White Album” — but I like to see a sly allusion to “Moby-Dick.” In the seven years since the release of his first commercial record, Dylan had become the white whale of 20th-century popular song, a wild, unconquerable and often baffling force of musical nature who drove fans and critics Ahab-mad in their efforts to spear him, lash him to the hull and render him merely comprehensible. --- Bruce Handy, NYTimes ____________________________________________ I figured we can start fresh with Bob Dylan.  Couldn't resist this photo of him striking a Woody Guthrie pose.  Looks like only yesterday.  Here is a link to the comments building up to this reading group.

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005