Skip to main content

Bombs Away

By



Trump scores his biggest endorsements yet in Tom Brady and Vladimir Putin, while Ted Cruz has the blessing of Sarah Palin, who looked like she was going to have an orgasm on national television.  Putin was less emphatic than Sarah, but nonetheless heaped praise on the Republican front runner, calling him, "a bright and talented person without any doubt."  Oddly enough, this endorsement might drive a wedge between Donald and Ted, as Ted is ardently anti-Russian, and we all know what Sarah thinks of Russia.

The Republican nomination process has now become a veritable cluster fuck.  This was just the capstone to a crazy week that saw the Republicans go at it again on the Las Vegas strip, pitching limited nuclear war, cluster bombs and any and all means necessary to bring ISIS (or ISIL) to heel.  Ben Carson compared fighting ISIS to taking a tumor out of a child's head, some lives will undoubtedly be lost but Syria will thank him in the end.  Assuming there is any Syria left, or Middle East for that matter.

Only Rand Paul stood there shaking his head, wondering what the hell was going on.  He chose to single out Chris Christie, who was busy matching bluster for bluster with the other seven would-be commander-in-chiefs.  But, as David Roberts noted in this Vox article, Rand pulled back in his criticism so as not to spoil the show. World War III be damned.  Judging from the audience's hoots and hollers, no action was too much when it comes to taking the war to the Islamic State.  If this brings about the End Days then so be it, the religious conservative base of the Republican Party is ready.

If anyone had any doubts who was driving the Republican Party this year, these doubts were dispelled Tuesday.  The GOP has sold itself to the Nativists and religious nabobs of its base.  It's like one of those old Vaudeville shows where the guys on stage will say anything and do anything to draw cheers from the crowd.  If all else fails throw a pie in someone's face, only to get it thrown back at you.  This is Trump's show.

Rand wasn't even supposed to be there.  Chris had been called up to replace him, but at the last minute Rand was given a spot, thanks to a late-breaking Fox poll that gave him barely enough popular support to be on the main stage.  This meant that George Pataki was called in to be the fourth at the side table.  This didn't stop our undercards from showing who had the most bluster among themselves.  Mike Huckabee had harsh words for the Millennials, making it sound like he would bring back the draft so that the military could fly however many sorties are necessary to bring these radical Muslims to heel.  Lindsey Graham seemed on the point of tears, evoking the memory of George "Dubya" Bush's administration.

Lindsey puts ISIL squarely in Obama's lap, like all the others.  They think everything was just fine under our past commander-in-chief, seeming to forget that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had spiraled out of control and Robert Gates was brought in to clean that cluster fuck up.  Gates stayed with the Obama administration through 2011, managing the pullout from Iraq, which at the time no one raised any complaints about.  But, now that the "Islamic State" has emerged from the ruin, Republicans are desperate to get boots back on the ground, as they seem to believe that "war is a force that gives us meaning," to borrow from Chris Hedges.  Of course, Chris meant it ironically, but there is no sense of irony in the Grand Old Party.  The GOP takes everything at face value and only looks back in history (mostly Biblical history) to bolster its own points.

I'd like to think the Republicans are digging their own graves.  It is hard to imagine that the vast majority of the American public looks on these debates and this crazy election year for anything more than entertainment value.  I can only hope that very few persons (even Tom Brady and Vladimir Putin) take these guys seriously.  If they do, woe be it to our proud nation.  If you thought George Bush was a bad president, anyone of these guys would be immeasurably worse.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Searchers

By
You are invited to join us in a discussion of  The Searchers , a new book on John Ford's boldest Western, which cast John Wayne against type as the vengeful Ethan Edwards who spends eight years tracking down a notorious Comanche warrior, who had killed his cousins and abducted a 9 year old girl.  The film has had its fair share of detractors as well as fans over the years, but is consistently ranked in most critics'  Top Ten Greatest Films . Glenn Frankel examines the origins of the story as well as the film itself, breaking his book down into four parts.  The first two parts deal with Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, perhaps the most famous of the 19th century abduction stories.  The short third part focuses on the author of the novel, Alan Le May, and how he came to write The Searchers. The final part is about Pappy and the Duke and the making of the film. Frankel noted that Le May researched 60+ abduction stories, fusing them together into a nar...
123 comments
Read more