Skip to main content



The love for our troops was never been more personified than at the massive turnout for the memorial of Chris Kyle.  You can still watch the glorious "final salute" at Dallas Stadium in full on Youtube.  The service drew a wide range of relatives, friends, and politicians.  There was even a 200-mile funeral procession that ran from his home in Midlothian to Austin, where his body was laid to rest at the Texas State Cemetery.  All along the route, tens of thousands turned up at overpasses and by the roadside to pay their last respects.  It was a funeral service fit for a king.  To top it all off, there was a movie that served as his requiem, further cementing the "American Sniper" in history.

Unfortunately, many of the things said in his book and in the movie based on the book don't hold up.  It seems Chris Kyle stretched his medal count a little, as he did numerous other items previously reported.    No matter, in the minds of his fans, Chris will forever remain the embodiment of America's elite fighting force, the Navy Seals.

I haven't been able to understand this idol worship.  Do we really want to honor a sniper who said himself he didn't differentiate between Iraqi men, women and children.  To him they were all the enemy in a war that had no reason for being.  Unlike Vietnam, a huge effort was made on the part of Americans to differentiate between the dirty deeds of politicians and the actions of combatants on the ground, even when horrible acts like that at Abu Ghraib surfaced at the height of the war.  Clearly, not all these soldiers were cut from the same cloth, and incidents like these cannot be so easily dismissed no matter how hard we try.

Part of the problem is that we have been conditioned to believe that the armed forces are fighting for our hard-earned freedom, even though the boundaries have been stretched over the years, and now they are fighting for the freedom of others, whether they want these special services or not.  We seem to think that without our military we would be overrun by one existential threat or another and that we owe it to our soldiers to honor their valiant efforts.

After the War of Independence, the fledgling United States disbanded the Continental Army.  It may have been a hasty decision but what the leaders did was focus on the peace and prosperity of our country, coming up with plans to improve industrial infrastructure, build a capital on the banks of the Potomac River to compete with those of Europe, and write a Constitution that would serve as the cornerstone of our Republic.  No one imagined a permanent national army, which is why they added the second amendment to the Constitution, empowering state militia units.

In fact, after every war we scaled back our military and concentrated our efforts into rebuilding our infrastructure, and redressing the shortsightedness of our founding fathers by amending the Constitution.  Today, military cuts are unthinkable despite there being no serious threat to our country.  Instead, we continue to invest heavily in a military industrial complex whose main purpose appears to be to keep our leading industries flush with cash and tangentially build new fighter jets and other weapons.  We even privatized certain aspects of our military to bring in consultants like Halliburton and Blackwater, which now goes by the name Academi.

More and more, the military complex is interwoven into the private sector.  Chris Kyle had set up a company to train police in urban warfare techniques.  We have seen the militarization of police departments across the country, which bought surplus military equipment at bargain prices to ramp up its efforts at fighting crime and homegrown terrorists.  There is now a very thin line between the military and homeland security.  Of course, the National Guard has always been there to lend a hand when demonstrations get out of hand or a natural disaster weakens municipal and regional security, but now we see police in full combat gear ready to squash protests like that in Ferguson, Missouri.  The transformation has become so complete that we honor our fallen police officers with the same reverence as we do military servicemen, regardless of the circumstances of that surrounded their deaths.

The last 16 years has seen a move toward a militarized state like no other time in American history. Homeland Security is so vast now that it can monitor almost all aspects of our society.  The only thing keeping it honest is a presidential administration that understands the ramifications of such a broad surveillance network and has placed internal checks and balances.  However, there is nothing stopping a less prudent president from ratcheting up this surveillance network to Orwellian proportions, and using whatever means at his disposal to impose order.

That's why I'm a little more circumspect this Memorial Day.  I don't feel I owe my freedom to the armed servicemen and women who died serving this country.  I owe my freedom to the activists that fought for a more just society across the country, and pushed the government to enact legislation that protected the rights of all Americans.  What we need to do is take a hard look at the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security Act and ask ourselves if this is what we want hanging over our heads?  Don't let yourself be sold a phony bill of goods.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dylan in America

Whoever it was in 1969 who named the very first Bob Dylan bootleg album “Great White Wonder” may have had a mischievous streak. There are any number of ways you can interpret the title — most boringly, the cover was blank, like the Beatles’ “White Album” — but I like to see a sly allusion to “Moby-Dick.” In the seven years since the release of his first commercial record, Dylan had become the white whale of 20th-century popular song, a wild, unconquerable and often baffling force of musical nature who drove fans and critics Ahab-mad in their efforts to spear him, lash him to the hull and render him merely comprehensible. --- Bruce Handy, NYTimes ____________________________________________ I figured we can start fresh with Bob Dylan.  Couldn't resist this photo of him striking a Woody Guthrie pose.  Looks like only yesterday.  Here is a link to the comments building up to this reading group.

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005