Skip to main content

Trump Force One




Our President-Elect seems to be having a lot of fun playing Lockheed-Martin off Boeing in his ongoing Twitter wars.  This is a tactic he has used throughout his career.  In his book, Art of the Deal, he boasted how he forced Holiday Inn to buy him out when he made a highly publicized bid to buy them out in the 80s.  He didn't have the capital but it was enough to send stock into frenzy, grossing him 6 bucks on the dollar.  Recently, he sent Boeing and Lockheed stocks into a nosedive by tweeting misleading numbers and making it look like he is trying to negotiate better deals on Air Force One and the notorious F-35's.  However, all he is doing is creating an unnecessary market panic largely for the consumption of the news media.

The Boeing tweets were really something as the new fleet of Air Force One super-planes are scheduled to come in at $2.7 billion, not $4 billion as he stated in his tweets.  He used a number supplied by analysts for rhetorical sake and then made a big show of getting Boeing to promise it wouldn't exceed that cost.  Essentially, he forced the Boeing CEO to meet with him, lending the air of a man in charge of the media-manufactured moment.

Stoked by his success, Trump decided to go after the much derided contract the US government has with Lockheed-Martin for a new fleet of fighter jets.  This deal dates back to the late 90s and has gone much over budget, now estimated at a whopping $1.35 trillion.  Unlike the new Air Force Ones, the F-35 is already in production and jets have been delivered.  Israel has greeted the first part of that order, a deal they signed onto back in 2003.  But, Donald thinks he can do better and asked Boeing to price its F-18's to see if he can find a competitive alternative.  Even in business, this isn't how contracts work.  Once you've made a deal you stick with it unless one or the other partner in the deal fails to deliver.  Lockheed-Martin may have made a cash cow out of the program but they are delivering on their jets and for the most part the Navy is happy with what they are getting.  The Lockheed CEO doesn't appear very anxious to sit down with Donald.

Twitter is going to be Donald's principal weapon in the White House to bring corporations and other nations to heel, although it didn't work so well with China.  He's testing out his power in his Trump Tower before taking over the Oval Office.  Sensing the volatility of the market, Boeing chose to use discretion rather than standing down the President-Elect, much like other industrialists who don't want to get on the Donald's bad side.

Back in 1988, his "bid" at a hostile takeover of Holiday Inn was purely motivated by his dislike for the corporate CEO Mike Rose, who had slighted him in public.  Anyone who doesn't think his administration won't be one of the most vindictive ones ever seen has another thing coming.  Omarosa warned us in a Frontline interview, although it seems he will have to battle "Pootie" for the title of most powerful man in the universe.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

The People Debate the Constitution

As Pauline Maier describes in Ratification , there was no easy road in getting the Constitution ratified.  After 10 years of living together as a loosely knit confederation, a few forward thinking men decided that the Articles of Confederation no longer worked and it was time to forge a Constitution.  Washington would not go until he could be assured something would come of the convention and that there would be an august body of gentlemen to carry the changes through.  But, ultimately Maier describes it was the people who would determine the fate of the new Constitution. This is a reading group for Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution 1787-1788 .  The book has been well received by fellow historians like Jack Rakove , among others.  Maier has drawn from a wealth of research piecing together a story that tells the arduous battle in getting the Constitution ratified.  A battle no less significant than that Americans fought for independence.