Skip to main content
By



Nancy Pelosi finds herself in a fight for the role of House Speaker.  Many Democrats campaigned on the theme they wouldn't support Pelosi for Speaker, knowing the animosity in their Congressional districts toward the Democratic leader.  Of course, most of this animosity was planted and cultivated by right wing demagogues over the last two years in an effort to make Nancy the Hillary of the 2018 midterms.  It didn't work, but still many freshmen Dems and a few senior ones have had their fill of Pelosi as their leader.

Marcia Fudge has emerged as the alternative to Pelosi, an outspoken Ohio Congresswoman who has the support of at least 17 renegade Democrats, if we are to believe the stories coming out of Washington.  Fudge has been in the House since 2008 and feels Pelosi is out of step with the new Democratic majority.  She has a point.  Pelosi endorsed many of the new class's opponents during the primaries, most notably Joe Crowley in New York's 14th Congressional district.  He was soundly thumped by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  Democrats appeared to take the House in spite of Pelosi not because of her.

Making this fight even odder is that many Republicans are offering their support for Pelosi, including Donald J. himself, seemingly for no other purpose than to make her the "Theresa May" of Congress for the next two years.  They would love to dump their big sack of woes on her, much like the British Tories dumped Brexit on May.

Careful what you wish for, as Pelosi knows how to fight.  She wouldn't have survived the fallout from the 2010 Congressional debacle, when the Democrats lost the House in stunning fashion, if she didn't.  This was the last time she faced a major challenge within her own party.

One of the fears in Pelosi is that she will be too willing to strike a deal with Trump to promote bi-partisanship.  Trump has shown he will go anyway the wind blows, as he did last year when he teased "Chuck and Nancy" with an agreement on DACA to avoid a government shutdown.  We all know how that turned out.

The Democrats should brook no compromise that doesn't suit their interests these next two years, as they swept the House largely because of all the animosity directed toward Trump and Republican leadership in Congress.  They won big in suburban districts and even some rural areas that had traditionally been Republican.  In one of the biggest surprises of the midterms, the Dems stole a seat from the Republicans in South Carolina, where Joe Cunningham beat Kate Arlington, whom Trump endorsed in the primaries over Mark Sanford.  Cunningham is the first Democrat to represent the district in 40 years!

In all, the Dems gained 34 seats and are leading 5 other seats in recounts across the country.  What many news pundits dismissed as a ripple on election night, has in fact become a wave, especially given the uphill battle Democrats faced in gerrymandered states.  For once, CNN actually had a good documentary, The War on Voting Rights, which included a young Aussie lawyer and her American husband fighting gerrymandering in Wisconsin.  Careful she doesn't get her green card revoked.  Had it been a level playing field, these midterms may have rivaled the 2010 red wave, when the Republicans gained a staggering 63 seats in the House.

For Democrats, it is important to keep that momentum rolling.  They can't afford any slip-ups over the next two years, as they hope to build on their gains in 2020 given the widespread antipathy toward Trump and Republican politics in general.   This is their chance to Make America Blue Again.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more