Skip to main content

Your play, Nancy

By



After her showdown with Trump over the government shutdown at the beginning of the year, Nancy Pelosi has been rather quiet.  However, last week she made the interesting comment that Trump "is becoming self-impeachable in terms of some of the things he's doing."  She was referring to his continued attempts to stonewall the House investigative committees who are trying to assess the depths of depravity outlined in Mueller's redacted report.

It seems Trump is itching for a fight with Nancy, anxious to make up for the one he lost in January.  He has literally commanded his staff not to submit to the House subpoenas.  This puts House Speaker Pelosi in the uncomfortable position of having to hold the Trump administration in contempt of Congress, something she is anxious to avoid.  Conversely, members of her own party are becoming increasingly anxious that she is not doing anything to hold the Trump administration accountable.  Where's the Nancy that stared Trump down on the shutdown?

There are those who still think Trump will answer to reason, but he has made no attempt to do so thus far, so why should we expect him to do so now?  Bill Barr was called in specifically to serve as his fixer and has done everything in his power to do so.  He openly taunt Pelosi at a recent presidential event.  To her credit, she shot right back at him.  The question remains will the House ever see a full Mueller report?

Meanwhile, Stevie Mnuchin is refusing to comply with the House subpoena for Trump's tax returns.  This after The NYTimes released a decade of the president's tax returns from the mid 80s and 90s in which he lost a reported $1.2 billion, more than any other person in America.  These were Trump's high flying years when he built Trump Tower and the Taj Mahal, assuming a massive debt, followed by bankruptcy.  Ever since, he has been claiming those enormous losses against his tax returns, leading accountants to speculate he hasn't paid any taxes in decades.  Of course he is not alone in this regard.  Many individuals and corporations write off their losses, showing no profits and therefor paying no taxes.  However, this does not make it right.

It's the conduct more than the tax returns or the Mueller report at this point.  Trump considers himself immune to any Congressional oversight and he has Barr and other lawyers backing him.  There is a lot of gray area here, as the Constitution doesn't clearly lay out how this oversight is to be conducted.  So, the executive branch is taking the liberty to define these rules and daring the legislative branch to challenge it.  Trump has even gone so far as to say he would drag the Supreme Court into this if the House did decide to impeach him.  However, the rules are very clear here.  The judicial branch has no say in the impeachment process.

Nancy is determined not to go down this road as she fears it will turn 2019 into absolute chaos with the 24 Democratic presidential candidates relegated to the margins of the news.  As it is, the presidential hopefuls are having a hard time getting their voices heard, except for Joe Biden, which the news media has anointed as the only Democrat capable of beating Donald Trump in 2020, pointing to polls that show the former vice-president ahead of Trump in key states like Pennsylvania, where Biden kicked off his campaign.

Trump would love nothing more than to see the election upended by the spectacle of his impeachment, which would be subsequently overturned by the Republican-led Senate.  Trump would consider himself yugely exonerated at that point and impervious to any attack from the Democrats. 

However, it all comes down to how the Democrats handle the impeachment, which at this point they are pretty much committed to do.  You simply can't allow a president to get away with this kind of stonewalling, even if there is little chance the Senate would approve it.  Your play, Nancy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Searchers

By
You are invited to join us in a discussion of  The Searchers , a new book on John Ford's boldest Western, which cast John Wayne against type as the vengeful Ethan Edwards who spends eight years tracking down a notorious Comanche warrior, who had killed his cousins and abducted a 9 year old girl.  The film has had its fair share of detractors as well as fans over the years, but is consistently ranked in most critics'  Top Ten Greatest Films . Glenn Frankel examines the origins of the story as well as the film itself, breaking his book down into four parts.  The first two parts deal with Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, perhaps the most famous of the 19th century abduction stories.  The short third part focuses on the author of the novel, Alan Le May, and how he came to write The Searchers. The final part is about Pappy and the Duke and the making of the film. Frankel noted that Le May researched 60+ abduction stories, fusing them together into a nar...
123 comments
Read more