Skip to main content

All Right All Right All Right

Seems like Matthew McConaughey is auditioning for the role of the next Mike Rowe.  He pitched his "centric" vision on the Russell Brand Show the other night, equating the conservative reaction to Trump's 2020 defeat to the liberal reaction to his victory in 2016.  Try as I might, I don't recall Team Hillary challenging the results or Obama refusing to meet Trump at the White House or putting up roadblocks to his transition team.  Nor, were there any attempts to overturn close results in state legislatures and federal courts, as we have seen with Trump's dubious legal team.  Yes, liberals weren't happy Trump won but they didn't go into denial, as Matty is suggesting, threatening to take up arms in protest as many in Magaland are now doing.

To this point, All Right Matty has tread a thin line in giving motivational speeches across the country and peddling his books, most recently Greenlights, in which he offers his Texan wit and wisdom.  The proud Austin boy, who first made his mark in Dazed and Confused, reached the summit of his thespian career in Dallas Buyers Club, winning a coveted Oscar for best actor.  Along the way, he starred in one rom com after another until even he got sick of them, pleading with the studios to give him a shot at something more serious.  

Unfortunately, the real Matthew McConaughey isn't much different than the one you see in his rom coms.  He's a guy with a relatively limited intellect, who tries to make up for it with a folksy manner that viewers can readily identify with.  Playing both ends against the middle, he's become a popular motivational speaker but I have to think audiences can't recall a single thing he said that is worth remembering.  

His little foray into post-election griping is just what Trumpists want to hear - setting up a false equivalence they can later use to justify all their whining and moaning in the aftermath of Trump's defeat.  Matty also likes to use nicknames, tagging the malcontents in the Democratic Party as the "illiberal left."  I'm not quite sure what he means by this, as the ones being illiberal right now are the malcontents in the Republican Party, who refuse to acknowledge Biden's win more than one month after the election.  To date only 20+ Republican members of Congress have accepted Biden as President-Elect.  

In fact, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wouldn't even comment on whether Congress was preparing for President-Elect Biden's inauguration on January 20.  Instead, the Senate congressional panel blocked a resolution acknowledging they were preparing for the swearing-in ceremony.  It's as if there might still be a few tricks left up their sleeve to overturn the results despite now having reached "safe harbor."  

Seems these guys have been watching Season 5 of House of Cards, and are trying to figure out if they can pull a stunt like Frank Underwood did to upend Will Conway, the apparent winner in the mythical election.  To quote Woody Allen, "life doesn't imitate art, it imitates bad television."

That's been the case throughout Trump's tumultuous tenure.  His administration has literally looked like they have been faking it these last four years as they try to overturn any piece of "illiberal" legislation with an executive order.  In most cases, their efforts were shot down by federal courts.   The "illiberal left" managed to flip the House in 2018, putting up a roadblock to Trump and his buddy Mitch, but that enthusiasm didn't spill over into 2020.  Much like 2016, Democrats across the country decided to go with an establishment nominee despite more appealing liberal candidates.  The "illiberal left" was forced to swallow its pride and accept Joe and Kamala even if it meant putting their legislative dreams on hold for another four years.  

Steve Schmidt summed it up pretty well last night on Amanpour & Co. when he said that the current Biden coalition is very fragile with all sides claiming victory.  There really is no direction a Biden administration can go except down the middle, if he wants to hold onto this coalition in 2024.  It's like the old Stealers Wheel song Stuck in the Middle with You.

The only problem with this "centric" vision is that we end up going nowhere.  If we turn to the left, the Lincoln Project Republicans will hop off the bus. Turn to the right and the Illiberal Left will abandon the party and put forward their own candidate(s) in 2024.  What we are left with is a watered-down Third Way, which has long been mentioned in politics, but has yet to achieve the kind of "social democracy" its more liberal proponents imagined.  They still get the term backward.

Unfortunately, Russell didn't put up much resistance to Matty's poor choice of words or false equivalences.  He played along with the affable actor, happy to have him on his show.  Nothing much would have come of it except that McConaughey is getting a lot of play in conservative circles, much like Mike Rowe has done in recent years with the success of his "Dirty Jobs."  It seems Matty's ultimate goal is to run for governor of Texas, at least that seems to be the betting line in the Lone Star State.  His kind of "centric" view might play well in this evermore "centric" state, but I don't think would make much of a splash in Austin, which he calls home these days.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...