Skip to main content

Old Wounds

By


As heartwarming as this image is, let's not forget that these two were responsible in whole or part for equally heinous wars in the Balkans and Iraq.  If you listen closely to Putin, he is using much the same language Clinton used to justify NATO involvement in the civil war in Yugoslavia, and Bush used to justify his invasion of Iraq.  Russia always likes to couch its heinous actions on international precedents, even those it opposed.

Much like Clinton's justification for NATO air strikes in Serbia to protect Kosovo, Putin believes that he is justified to strike Ukraine to protect what he regards as the autonomous Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, which has been the nexus of a civil war for eight years.  In Putin's addled mind, these breakaway republics have just as much legitimacy as the republics that arose in the wake of the Balkan Wars in the 1990s.  He used the same arguments back in 2008 when his government recognized the breakaway Republicans of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Northern Georgia (Sakartvelo), similarly initiating a war in the country.

I was once a part of a NYTimes forum group on Eastern Europe back in the early 2000s.  There were quite a few Putin supporters, and one of the sore points they alluded to time again was the Balkan Wars.  The dissolution of Yugoslavia and the portrayal of Serbia as the villain in those civil wars was something they hung on the United States, Bill Clinton in particular.  Putin supporters used these wars to justify Russia's own incursions into neighboring states, as Russia was simply protecting its interests.  They also viewed Putin as a necessary counterweight to US aggression.  

We had these arguments for years.  I kept in touch with one of the persons from that forum group, a Ukrainian living in Seattle.  We actually met back in 2005, when I was briefly living in Seattle.  At the time, Russia didn't seem like that much of a threat and so this was more a difference of opinion than anything else.  I chided him when Putin was elected to a third term in 2012, as my friend was convinced Putin would move to the background of Russian politics and let others take the lead.  Obviously that didn't happen.  I want to broach him on the subject again in the wake of the war in Ukraine, but he recently lost his wife and I don't want to get into such arguments when he has such a great personal loss to deal with.  

The war is dividing Ukrainians and Russians in ways that are strongly reminiscent of the Balkan wars, which saw Yugoslavia shatter into a myriad of pieces rather than the UN try to reconcile the divisions through a canton-system similar to Switzerland.  I remember this was one of the arguments made in the forum.  In the end, six new republics were forged from the old communist country, eight if you count Kosovo and Vojvodina.  Several still struggle to establish any kind of economic and political independence.  Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro and North Macedonia (as it is called now) were all admitted into NATO, further angering Russia.  Politically, Russia still exercises a great deal of influence in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. 

Russia would similarly love to carve Ukraine up, taking parts of it into its sphere of influence.  Putin doesn't seem particularly worried about the consequences, as he feels morally justified in his actions based on what happened to Yugoslavia.

Putin is also using many of the same arguments George Bush used to justify his invasion of Iraq before the UN Security Council in 2002.  The Russian autocrat claims Ukraine is developing weapons of mass destruction with the help of the United States, pointing to biolabs throughout Ukraine, which the US funded to one degree or another.  You get the gist of these claims in this Global Times opinion by Frank Bro.  GT is an English-language propaganda arm of the Chinese Communist Party.  Putin also claims Ukraine is developing "dirty bombs"  These audacious claims have been debunked, as were Bush's claims that Iraq possessed WMD's.  Nevertheless, Bush invaded Iraq and we are still living with the consequences of this rash act.

This is why these two former US presidents should keep a low profile.  We really don't need them in the discussion.  There is nothing more Putin would love than to pick open these old wounds to justify his invasion of Ukraine.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dylan in America

By
Whoever it was in 1969 who named the very first Bob Dylan bootleg album “Great White Wonder” may have had a mischievous streak. There are any number of ways you can interpret the title — most boringly, the cover was blank, like the Beatles’ “White Album” — but I like to see a sly allusion to “Moby-Dick.” In the seven years since the release of his first commercial record, Dylan had become the white whale of 20th-century popular song, a wild, unconquerable and often baffling force of musical nature who drove fans and critics Ahab-mad in their efforts to spear him, lash him to the hull and render him merely comprehensible. --- Bruce Handy, NYTimes ____________________________________________ I figured we can start fresh with Bob Dylan.  Couldn't resist this photo of him striking a Woody Guthrie pose.  Looks like only yesterday.  Here is a link to the comments building up to this reading group.
182 comments
Read more

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro
228 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more