Skip to main content

Remember the Kursk

Russians fleeing Kursk

You might recall that when Putin took office way back in 2000, he let the Kursk submarine lie at the bottom of the Barents Sea well past the point that any chance of rescuing the 23 survivors of the explosion was lost.  Now, he finds himself in an interesting dilemma where a region by the same name is occupied by Ukraine and he is reluctant to provide the necessary military forces to regain it.  By doing so, he would sacrifice strategic gains he has made in the Donetsk region.  

This was a bold move on the part of Ukraine.  Patience was wearing thin after they received the first installments of the $60+ billion military aid package from the US, along with F-16 jets and heavy artillery from NATO countries.  Ukraine needed to do something to justify these enormous expenses, and so they struck Russia's weakest point, its own border.  No one saw it coming, least of all Russia, which had minimal forces stationed in Kursk.  

At first, the US and its NATO allies were a bit miffed.  They had allowed Ukraine to hit targets in Russia but not to invade Russia.  However, with peace talks back on the table, Zelinskyy felt Ukraine needed some bargaining power, so his military forces seized a huge swathe of Russia roughly equivalent the territory Russia currently occupies in Ukraine, not counting Crimea.  

While Ukraine has changed the landscape in the ongoing war, it really hasn't altered the situation significantly.  However, it has disproven two myths.  One that Russia is impervious to attack and two that Putin would use tactical nuclear weapons if pressed.  It's been more than a month since Ukraine took Kursk and still Putin dawdles.  This can't look good in the eyes of Russians who thought themselves safe from the war in Ukraine.  

The news media was filled with images of fleeing Russians begging for mercy, but for the most part Ukrainian soldiers obliged them in their exodus.  There was no attempt made to hold them or separate children from their parents as we saw in Donetsk when Russian forces occupied the region at the start of the war in February, 2022.  It has been a relatively peaceful operation with very few casualties.  Ukraine has taken out three bridges and destroyed airport tarmacs, making it difficult for Russia to launch a counter attack.

The Great Commander hasn't taken this turn of events lying down.  Putin fired more missiles and drones on Ukrainian energy infrastructure and cities, even having his occupying forces set one of the cooling towers of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant on fire and try to blame Ukraine for the damage.  At this point, very few persons are buying his lies.

It's been a tough month for Vlad.  In July it looked like he had everything going his way including the US election where Trump was poised to take Biden down in a historic landslide.  Russian media was literally drooling over this possibility, as they felt they would soon have all of Ukraine for the taking, not just the land bridge Putin had created to Crimea.  But a funny thing happened.  Old Joe withdrew from the race and all of the sudden this heretofore barely known Kamala Harris rose to the top of the ticket and Trump's lead in the national polls disappeared in a blink of an eye.  Now, the election is a toss up, and Vlad is none too happy about that.

Much of the misinformation and absurd claims spreading through social media emanate from the Kremlin.  Their spokespersons, Maria Zakharova chief among them, are pushing the bogus claim that the move to replace Biden was illegal and have called for an investigation.  If that sounds familiar it is  because American conservative outlets work hand in hand with Russian propaganda outlets to spread these distortions either as tools or useful idiots.  It was very effective in taking down Biden. They just didn't think it would happen before the election, so now they are forced to come up with new lines of attack on Kamala Harris.

I hope at some point this vast shared network will be fully exposed and all those who knowingly took part in this collaborated effort will be held to account.  Namely, guys like Steve Bannon, Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn, who have direct ties with Moscow.  In the meantime, I hope that Americans will be more circumspect about what they see and hear in their conservative news, both in regard to the election and Ukraine.

It was great to hear Kamala say in her acceptance speech that she would defend Ukraine and NATO allies.  A far cry from the gobbledygook we have been hearing from Trump in his interviews, like this one with Dr. Phil.  Safe to say he has no idea what is going on but still tries to project himself as the only one who can bring peace to the region.

Of course a lot of people would like Ukraine to go away.  No one likes malingering wars that threaten armageddon.  However, this is a war we can't afford to lose especially as we see Afghanistan brought back into the news three years after its downfall.  To do so would be to forfeit any role we have in bringing autocratic governments to task.  It's fortunate that Ukrainians are willing to fight for their freedom whereas Afghanis were not.  Once the pullout began under the Trump administration, Afghani forces simply rolled over and played dead with the Taliban seizing much of the NATO ordnance in the process.  

This war is not only about Ukraine's right to self determination but about bringing Putin to heel for what has been a 24-year terror campaign in which he has openly attacked two countries, fommeted wars in Central Asia and put bounties on American soldiers' heads in Afghanistan. Throughout, he has claimed no culpability even when it was shown that his forces shot down a civilian airliner over Donetsk in 2014.  In his addled mind, everyone else is the terrorist.

Ultimately, Russians need to wake up and see what his failed leadership has wrought their country.  If it wasn't for China and India propping up its economy, Russia would have long ago fallen into a financial tailspin.  But, they all still dream of BRICS and becoming the dominate player in the world economy.  Seeing Russians flee Kursk must have given them some pause.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Searchers

You are invited to join us in a discussion of  The Searchers , a new book on John Ford's boldest Western, which cast John Wayne against type as the vengeful Ethan Edwards who spends eight years tracking down a notorious Comanche warrior, who had killed his cousins and abducted a 9 year old girl.  The film has had its fair share of detractors as well as fans over the years, but is consistently ranked in most critics'  Top Ten Greatest Films . Glenn Frankel examines the origins of the story as well as the film itself, breaking his book down into four parts.  The first two parts deal with Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, perhaps the most famous of the 19th century abduction stories.  The short third part focuses on the author of the novel, Alan Le May, and how he came to write The Searchers. The final part is about Pappy and the Duke and the making of the film. Frankel noted that Le May researched 60+ abduction stories, fusing them together into a nar...