Skip to main content

The Drone Wars



Mark Mazzetti is shedding light on America's "secret army" in his upcoming book, The Way of the Knife.  Obama finds himself in hot water these days over the constitutionality of his continued use of drones to carry out hits abroad.  The CIA has its own personal drone fleet in addition to that of the military.  Obama has expressed himself that he would like to see the two folded back into one, but continues to favor these surgical strikes against believed terrorists.

The use of drones is nothing new.  Remotely piloted vehicles, or RPVs, go back to the 50s but were primarily used as surveillance planes.  It was during the Vietnam War that RPVs began to carry missiles and were used for air strikes.  The newest generation of drones were extensively used under the Bush administration, but Obama has extended the "drone armada" even further, as Oliver Stone noted in his last episode of the Untold History of the United States, using it to police the world's air space.

Mazzetti calls it a "shadow war" carried out by the CIA that has resulted in growing concern over the US reliance on drones to carry out what essentially amount to extralegal executions, including those of American citizens who have joined one or another terrorist group abroad.


Comments

  1. The biggest worry for me is the precedent that is being set in carrying out these hits. Democrats were very critical when Bush resorted to these methods to take out suspected terrorists in countries other than those the US was fighting in, and here is Obama now doing the same, claiming that there is nothing specifically stated in the Constitution to stop him from doing the same.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have very ambiguous feelings about this. Just because there's nothing in the Constitution, doesn't mean it's right. On the other hand, as a nation we authorize the slaughter of thousands on foreign soils and think nothing of it. And some of those killed easily could be US citizens who have put on the "uniform" of the other side.

    As part of the Brennan testimony I heard that he wants to move the program from the CIA to the military where it would at least have a little more Congressional involvement.

    The biggest problem with the drones is that there is no oversight outside the White House. Obama better think long and hard before leaving a program in place to give this kind of unlimited power to kill any one anywhere to his successors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yea, we assume Obama manages this program well, but it is giving far too much latitude to the CIA. Give them an inch, they will take a mile each and every time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am much more willing to sanction the use of drones without Congressional oversight than I'm willing to sanction preemptive war with Congressional oversight. Indeed, Congress is so severely dysfunctional and corrupt that I'm not comfortable with its oversight of anything. For me this is a simple question of the lesser of two evils. Not even close in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dylan in America

Whoever it was in 1969 who named the very first Bob Dylan bootleg album “Great White Wonder” may have had a mischievous streak. There are any number of ways you can interpret the title — most boringly, the cover was blank, like the Beatles’ “White Album” — but I like to see a sly allusion to “Moby-Dick.” In the seven years since the release of his first commercial record, Dylan had become the white whale of 20th-century popular song, a wild, unconquerable and often baffling force of musical nature who drove fans and critics Ahab-mad in their efforts to spear him, lash him to the hull and render him merely comprehensible. --- Bruce Handy, NYTimes ____________________________________________ I figured we can start fresh with Bob Dylan.  Couldn't resist this photo of him striking a Woody Guthrie pose.  Looks like only yesterday.  Here is a link to the comments building up to this reading group.

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005