Monday, March 27, 2017
It's a rare day when a conservative radio talk show retracts a statement much less what he regarded as a "major story," but Alex Jones did just that. He has apologized for spreading the inflammatory "pizzagate" conspiracy theory that had actually drawn former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn into its web. We are still waiting on Jones to drop his long standing view that Sandy Hook was a "false flag."
These faux news outlets are coming under increased scrutiny now that we have a President who draws heavily from them. Trump's wiretapping claim was pulled from Breitbart, and Spicey spread a story aired by Judge Nap that Obama outsourced surveillance on Trump Tower to the UK Government Communications Headquarters. Fox News later took action against Judge Nap for spreading a false story.
The basis for much of this fake news emanates from Russian and Eastern European sources. Some of it is child's play like these Macedonian kids who were taking advantage of the gullibility of Trump supporters to score hits on social media, hoping to draw advertising dollars. But, the UK outsourcing story emanated from RT, or Russia Today, an English propaganda news site sponsored by the Kremlin. Once these stories get picked up it is pretty hard to shake them, as they are shared widely through social media and picked up by news commentators to provide credence for their opinions.
What makes the wiretapping story particularly noxious is that it was given credence by the White House. While some Republicans are questioning Trump's grasp of reality, no Republican has yet to accuse him of lying. I suppose if the story first came from Mark Levin, Trump isn't lying but rather spreading an erroneous story, which Spicey augmented by referencing Judge Nap's additional accusations.
Rather than disown the story, Trump stated he was "somewhat vindicated" by the report Congressmen Devin Nunes gave him that some members of his campaign team were the subject of "incidental surveillance" after the election. Trump had specifically accused Obama of tapping Trump Tower before the election.
I seriously doubt we will ever get an apology from Trump. Chris Wallace pressed Reince Priebus on the matter, and Trump's chief of staff adamantly stated that they don't accept the findings of the FBI chief on the wiretapping. In their minds, Mark Levin's unfounded story stands.
This makes Alex Jones a better person than Donald Trump as he was finally able to let one of his conspiracy theories go. That had to be a bitter pill to swallow for a man who has only two entries in the correction section of his website.
Sunday, March 26, 2017
This is what happens when you have no game plan but rather try to do things on the fly. Of course, Trump can blame Paul Ryan, which I'm sure he will do, as he is the one who came up with this noxious health care plan that no one wanted. Only 17 per cent of Americans showed support for it, and it is highly doubtful any of these persons knew what was in it.
Republicans had been met by raucous town halls in their Congressional districts, demanding they come up with something better or leave Obamacare alone. Too many persons have come to rely on the current affordable care act to have it gutted the way Ryan and his Republican cronies wanted to do, essentially dressing up a trillion dollars in tax cuts for the wealthy as a health care bill.
One would like to think that the veil has been lifted and conservative voters will finally realize they have been had, but it is unlikely that is the case. Trump still has an approval rating in the high 30s, which means most rank-and-file Republicans continue to support him despite what has been a horrid two months in office.
His attempt to establish a travel ban on predominantly Muslim countries was shot down again. This time in a Hawaiian federal court, leading many Trumpkins to voice their indignation at the Aloha State rather than a President who doesn't know how to write an executive order that sticks.
It takes months to prepare an executive order. It has to be run through any number of legal experts to see if it will hold muster in a federal court. Still, there are no assurances, as former President Obama found out several times. The Constitution is the Holy Grail of our American legal system. Even Neil Gorsuch believes himself bound by it, although his "textualist" approach to the Constitution is deemed heartless by some.
Paul Ryan tried to brush off the raucous town halls, believing Republicans would fall in line behind his bill. Unlike the Affordable Care Act that went through any number of agonizing revisions, the American Health Care Act was presented as if handed down from up high in tablet form and no one should question it. But, House Republicans weren't too anxious to face the wrath of their Congressional districts with elections coming up within a year and doubted its legitimacy. Ryan could barely hide his contempt. He tried to strong arm wayward Republicans only to find opposition grow. So, he enlisted Trump to take the GOP health care bill on the road, only to find the Donald was more interested in the latest Mack truck than he was so-called "Trumpcare."
There was no easy answer, as Trump himself proclaimed, which may explain his reluctance to enthusiastically sign onto this stinker of a bill. Republicans were essentially forced to come up with an alternative, when many wanted to do away with subsidized federal health insurance all together. The bill called for massive cuts in Medicaid and Medicare that would have left the most disadvantaged Americans shit out of luck. The CBO estimated as many as 50 million Americans would lose their health insurance as a result of this bill. How could Trump or any Republican Congressperson explain this to his or her constituency? For the moment, Democrats can gloat as Hillary is doing in this epic fail by the new Republican administration.
While some Republicans may be holding their heads down in shame, there will be a round two. They didn't work this hard to gain control of all branches of federal government only to see Obamacare become "the law of the land." Most likely they will wait till the new fiscal year to find ways to defund it.
Of course, it is convenient this way as Republicans can continue to blame the Affordable Care Act for rising premium rates. This had proved a very effective campaign mantra the past 6 years. But, having failed to get an alternative bill through their own Congressional committee it is going to be hard to push this issue once again on the campaign trail. More likely they will press ahead with tax cuts and try to pretend this ugly little chapter never happened. A somewhat humbled Trump seems quite prepared to move on from this debacle.
Friday, March 17, 2017
Last year Tony Toccone and Lisa Petersen adapted Sinclair Lewis' 1935 novel, It Can't Happen Here, into a play at the Berkeley Repertory Theatre. They avoided updating the setting to reflect the ongoing election, preferring to stay in the Depression era when fascism was a palpable threat. Lewis had teamed up with John C. Moffitt to first stage the book in 1936.
Since the rise of Trump, many periodicals have called attention to the novel. However, critics then saw Lewis' principal inspiration as being Huey Long, who was toying with the idea of a run for President before being assassinated the same year. Lewis certainly gave "Buzz" Windrip a down-home feeling, but he was projecting the rise of autocratism in Europe on America.
Oddly enough it was Roosevelt who took on an authoritarian air after his victory in 1936, as he tried to stack the Supreme Court in 1937 to obtain favorable rulings on his New Deal legislation. Congress blocked these efforts, dealing the President one of his biggest blows in office.
For these reasons and others, I thought it would be fun to revisit the book and draw our own conclusions. All readers are welcome. Please feel free to comment.
Sunday, March 12, 2017
There seems to be an odd alignment taking place in politics. Listen to Dennis Kucinich defend Trump's allegations that he was wiretapped. Kucinich also came out very favorably on Trump's first major speech to Congress. He has become a Leftie apologist for Trump on Fox News, defending numerous positions the President has taken, including Syria.
Kucinich views Trump as a "transitional figure," although it is pretty hard to discern what that means. It seems our erstwhile legislator thinks Trump will force a reassessment in traditional party alignments. He is oddly optimistic that the new President will take a softer approach to climate change and foreign policy than his rhetoric suggested during the campaign. However, Trump's first two months in office has pretty much made it clear that this will be a pro-fossil fuels administration and that its foreign policy will not be a radical departure from that we have seen the last 60 years. Nevertheless, Kucinich is willing to "see how this plays out."
The former Ohio representative has always been one to move to the beat of his own drum. He was a vocal critic of the affordable health care when it was being moved through Congress back in 2009 and 2010, preferring the single-payer plan the House Democrats first proposed, and was very critical of Obama throughout his administration, particularly of the ongoing drone war.
He has become the Ron Paul of the Democratic Party, pitching from the left wing of the Libertarian Party. In part because he has an ax to grind. The congressional district he once represented in Ohio was merged into another, forcing an election against fellow Democrat Marcy Kaptur, which he lost. Rather than take his ire out on the Republican legislature that merged the districts, he seems to be venting his anger on the Democrats who didn't vote him back into Congress, preferring Kaptur instead.
Since then, he has not only been pitching up at Fox regularly, where he is a paid contributor, but also at CPAC conferences like this one in Cleveland. Dennis said he felt comfortable holding a joint interview with the notorious Steve King, and proudly boasted he wasn't afraid to work both sides of the aisle in Congress despite the many obvious differences.
That may help explain why he is dredging up a phone call with a foreign official from 2011 in defense of Trump's wiretapping allegations. He was only made aware this "extralegal tap" took place when the Washington Times offered him a tape of a conversation he had with the son of Moammer Qaddafi. The meeting took place in a Chinese restaurant in Washington in 2015, four years later.
Kucinich claims it was within his constitutional rights to communicate with Libyan officials, having cleared it with the House general counsel. No attempt apparently to reach out to the state department or the president, whose authority on such matters he was overstepping. He really played up this call, suggesting it might have been used as a homing beacon for a drone strike, so he used a disposable cell phone to receive the call to minimize such risks. Sounds like he had a lot of contempt for the White House.
This story appears as far-fetched as Trump's 3:35 am morning tweet. The tape apparently turned up in Tripoli, so it is just as likely Libyan authorities were monitoring the call, if such a call even took place. After all, we are relying on an infamous right-wing newspaper that was using the call as part of its smear campaign in regard to Hillary's role in Benghazi, which Kucinich seemed to have no problem playing into it.
Even odder is how Kucinich can square Trump's willingness to side with Russia in Syria with his own opposition to Obama's engagement in Libya? The civil war that started back in 2011 has led to one of the worst humanitarian crises in recent decades and is the prime cause of the refugee crisis in Europe. If Dennis Kucinich is any indication, the Libertarian Left has lost its moorings.
Why is anyone's guess? We have to figure Kucinich is smart enough to know that Trump has long dealt in such pipe dreams. The Donald was going to resurrect Atlantic City back in the early 1990s with the grand opening of his Taj Mahal. The city was declared bankrupt in 2016 and taken into receivership by the state of New Jersey. The Taj Mahal had gone belly up long before. Sadly, this is what has happened with most of Donald Trump's ventures so why should anyone, particularly a tenacious bulldog like Dennis Kucinich, have any faith in Trump's plans?
It seems a lot of persons want to ride the Donald's coattails to celebrity status, maybe even make another bid for Congress or the Presidency itself in 2020. Kucinich tried twice before in 2004 and 2008. He didn't get very far with either campaign because his ideas sit too far on the Libertarian left for many voters beyond his former Congressional district to identify with him.
Before his 16-year tenure as the US Congressional Representative of Ohio's 10th District, he was the youngest mayor of Cleveland at the age of 31. It was a tumultuous two years which even saw the mafia take a hit out him for trying to clean up the city. Cleveland was on the verge of bankruptcy but Kucinich refused to go through with a fire sale of the city's assets, particularly its publicly owned electric utility, which earned him the enmity of the local mob that had its eyes on this utility. He lost the subsequent municipal election but won the hearts of local residents for standing up to the banks and the mob.
It's the kind of play a guy like Trump would make, so I suppose this could be another reason Kucinich feels he has found a kindred spirit in the President. I well understand the frustrations that Lefties have with the Democratic Party, but they would be truly fooling themselves to think Trump represents their interests. Trump's little trip to Flint, Michigan, was nothing more than a photo op, just like that little jaunt down to Louisiana when the floods ravaged the state last Fall. He has no real interest in the American people. The only thing he is interested in is protecting his brand name.
If Lefties like Kucinich genuinely want to see the country invest more in itself then I suggest they start by retaking cities like Cleveland and putting their plans into action, not lodging protest votes against the only political party we have that offers anything akin to a European socialist vision for this country. The health care plan the Republicans are currently promoting to replace the Affordable Care Act should make a guy like Kucinich cringe. And, you can bet that whatever "infrastructure plan" the Republicans eventually propose will be one that favors oil companies and other major industries not local redevelopment projects.
Unfortunately, the Lefties in this country are mostly talk and little action. They love to stage rallies to call attention to themselves but rarely if ever offer a constructive plan much less vision of what they hope to accomplish. Even Bernie, who I love, was notoriously vague on how he would pull off many of the promises he made on the campaign trail. But, Bernie at least understands the legislative process, which it appears Kucinich never really made the effort to learn. Too busy trying to negotiate backdoor peace deals with Libyan officials I guess.
He is perfect for Fox News, filling the void left by Alan Colmes, whether it be engaging in faux debates or offering Leftist support of Trump's agenda. Good luck, Dennis, don't let the door hit you on the way out.
Friday, March 10, 2017
A Day Without a Woman sounds like the title of a campy science fiction movie from the 60s, but it was an attempt to show the world how important women are in the work force. Unfortunately, it didn't gain the kind of groundswell the March on Washington and its sister marches did, and left some women wondering if this was more about privilege, as many women couldn't afford to take the risk of striking against their employers.
Nevertheless, the general strike created plenty of photo opportunities, keeping the issues of equal pay and health care in the public light. On the same day, the little tiny country of Iceland, with the highest representation of women in parliament, went one step further by passing legislation that forces businesses to prove they are paying genders equally. Little chance of that here in the US. Most states have equal pay laws but they go largely unenforced.
Politicians pay lip service to the idea of equal pay. Even His Trumpness tweeted how much he respects women. It's the kind of patronizing attitude many women are rebelling against, but unfortunately just as many women seem to accept the status quo. How else to explain that 54 per cent of white women voted for Trump? So, yes, it is a matter of privilege, but not quite the way news pundits are presenting it.
This is why the attempt to evoke Lysistrata failed. Unless you can get the overwhelming majority of women on board, these kinds of protests are doomed, and usually end up working against women in the collective American mind.
The news media loves presenting the women's movement as fanatical. Some years ago, Rush Limbaugh coined the term "Feminazi" and it has stuck. It didn't help matters when the organizers of the Women's March on Washington turned a cold shoulder to pro-life feminists, which was heavily reported in the conservative press. Many pro-life feminists turned out for the march just the same, as they feel the issue of feminism is much broader than choice, which has been at the center of the movement ever since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. However, it is not likely that the National Organization of Women will bend on this issue.
That's exactly how conservative politicians want it. They know there is a lot of sympathy for a number of issues the feminist movement promotes, but as long as these politicians can create a divide over the issue of abortion they can effectively splinter this movement. This has been the case in party politics as well, and why less than half of white women voted for Hillary in November.
You'd be hard pressed to find a woman who doesn't support equal pay for equal work, which was what this "strike" was about. However, the stigma of "feminism" keeps many women from showing their support in public. So, it seems a greater grass roots effort is necessary to make more women feel comfortable with such a "movement."
A greater awareness of the discrepancies needs to be shown, and this means reaching out to men as well. The value of a woman goes far beyond equal pay and to the way she is treated in the work force. Too many companies objectify women. Not just restaurants like Hooters but throughout the workforce and especially in the entertainment industry. Not much has changed since the images Mad Men and Masters of Sex presented of the late 1950s.
Women may have greater access today but it comes at a price. They are constantly being graded not just for their ability but for their looks, and are expected to remain "feminine." The double standard is nowhere more apparent than in sports, where lady tennis players are still required to wear skirts in most tournaments. The internet is filled with images of nubile young women athletes constantly being graded for their looks. When women come across as too masculine they are often "shamed," as has been the case with Serena Williams throughout her long illustrious career. This is just as true in everyday life, which is how we end up with terms like "bulldyke."
The entertainment media could do much more to help shatter these stereotypes but for the most part plays into them. Even women's magazines have a tendency to objectify women. Noah Berlatsky points out in this article from The Atlantic that many women's magazines still use the same tropes from the Victorian era, not to mention that the women represented are often very attractive and helped feed many a young boy's erotic fantasies before discovering Playboy, as these magazines are readily available in most homes.
For these and many other reasons, the women's movement needs to be taken to a much broader level, not continue to be narrowly defined by spokespersons and pundits, whether from the left or right of the political spectrum. The situation at Fox was a valuable "teaching moment" but now seems largely lost because the news media has gone right back to the same old double standards. Maybe what we need is a day without the objectification of women, reminding us that women are a valuable part of our life at every level.
Friday, March 3, 2017
Just when it seemed that the Trump administration had found its footing, one of its key figures turns out to be neck deep in what is quickly becoming Russiagate. The wily little former senator from Alabama wasn't forthcoming during his confirmation hearings for Attorney General and now finds himself on the hot seat. Not only that but Donnie Jr. and his son-in-law Jared are similarly being implicated in the confidence game the Trump campaign played with Russia to undermine Obama's sanctions back in December.
All this came after the news media essentially gave His Trumpness a free pass on his Address to the Nation, heaping all sorts of praise on him for having found his presidential bearing after one month. Van Jones, one of his fiercest critics, even opined that Trump could very well be a two-term president if he keeps giving speeches like that.
It wasn't like Trump offered any broad bipartisan plan. What the media reported favorably on was his tone, with many comparing the speech to that of Reagan. Music to Mr. Trump's ears, but he still chose to freeze CNN out of the loop the next day, with Mr. Pence skipping a stop at the cable news studio in favor of other news outlets. So much for playing nice.
CNN seemed willing to shift the narrative but allegations of Sessions' link to the Russian ambassador has forced the little weasel to recuse himself from the ongoing investigation. This opens the door once again for journalists to investigate this matter even deeper, as Congressional Republicans so far have dragged their feet. The media should have never dropped its guard in the first place, but those favorable polls following the speech probably had them thinking the public is tired of their critical stance and wanted them to look on the bright side of the Trump administration.
The address was riddled with the half-truths and lies we've come to expect from Trump. Politifact pointed out his whoppers, such as continuing to insist nearly 100 million persons are out of work, failing to consider that the vast majority of these persons are either retired or in school, and do not participate in the work force. He uses this hyperbolic rhetoric to try to convince Americans we are in a deep shit hole, despite conventional unemployment figures like the U4 and U6 that put the unemployment rate at 4.7 and 9.4 per cent respectively. This simply doesn't fit into his narrative so he continues to peddle the same campaign rhetoric that won him the presidency.
Unfortunately, the major news outlets refuse to hold him accountable to facts. Most of these outlets want to stay on his good side so that they don't get frozen out of the White House Press Corps as was the case with CNN, the Washington Post and other major news outlets. If Trump is trying to delegitimize these press outlets, it isn't working as the Washington Post and New York Times are both recording a spike in subscriptions and CNN is enjoying a surge in viewership. In other words, it pays to remain on the Donald's bad side.
Yet, the staunchest criticism is coming from late night comedy, as it was during the Bush years. MSNBC did manage to catch an unguarded Trump practicing his speech in his limo, which became instant fodder for jokes, but it too became the brunt of jokes by Seth Meyers, who skewered the media coverage of His Trumpness' speech, noting all the faux anticipation and salivation that followed. It was like a debutante ball for Trump.
Never mind that the guy signed an executive order to erode the clean water act earlier that day, while proclaiming himself an "environmentalist." Or, his brazen use of the widow of a Navy Seal to promote his strong relationship with the military, without owning up to the failed raid. He first blamed the military for the botched raid, then had Sean Spicer try to play it up as a "successful operation by all standards." It's this ability to play both sides of an issue that keeps the media off balance and leaves the public to wonder where Trump actually stands on the issues.
Nothing is more confusing than the Russiagate scandal that is unfolding. It is clear that Trump's campaign and congressional advisers met with Russian officials during the campaign and transition period, but Trump continues to insist it is no big deal. Everybody does it! As a result, much of his constituency feels the same way.
His advisers were actively engaging Moscow and giving Russian officials the impression that his administration would immediately move to lift the sanctions Obama imposed on their country in late December. This flies in the face of the Logan Act, and points to a clear attempt to undermine US policy that is in direct response to Russian aggressive acts over the past two years.
Because of the pressure put on him by the media and members of Congress, Trump has backed away from lifting the sanctions, which no doubt has left the Kremlin feeling uneasy. As a result, they are increasing military movements in the Baltic region. This has led Sweden to reinstate the draft, and other Baltic countries to increase military spending.
To a large degree, Trump feeds off this confusion. It has long been his modus operandi in the business world to create a volatile market which he feels he can take advantage of. However, when dealing with governments, such a tactic undermines confidence and gives foreign leaders false impressions that very well could plunge regions of the world into chaos. All we have to do is look at the lessons of WWI and WWII and most recently the Ukraine.
There is no clear idea who his most trusted advisers are. We hope that he listens to General Mattis and VP Pence, who both support a strong NATO and European stability. However, it seems he is drawn more to the rhetoric of his son-in-law Jared and his chief strategist Stephen Bannon, who both have used conservative media to promote conflict. Bannon undermined Pence's recent European tour by offering support to separatist movements in the EU.
Many of the high rollers that support Trump are profiteers and a war pays big dividends. There is a huge private military industry that profited immensely from the Iraq War and no doubt feels that it could profit even more from a larger global conflict. Trump himself has intimated war several times, even implied that maybe we would get another chance to seize Iraq's oil supply. Freudian slips?
Whatever the case, the media should never drop its guard with Trump. It should continue to challenge him on every issue and force him to define his overall policy, which to this point he has not done. His executive orders have largely been superficial, designed more to give the impression that he is a "decider." However, as Fareed Zakaria correctly pointed out, we shouldn't confuse motion with progress, comparing Trump's first month in office to a kid on a rocking horse.
Sunday, February 26, 2017
Looking at the other side of the aisle, the Democrats have a new party leader in Tom Perez. I don't know much about him, or whether he will unite the fractured party, but first signs seem to be positive. He immediately made Keith Ellison, his rival for the position, deputy chairman in an effort to unite the raucous crowd.
I also like that Perez said the party will focus more on down ticket races, rather than investing all this energy in the presidential race. It really was amazing to me that the Dems were unable to retake the Senate given more Republican seats were up for grabs than at any time in the past 6 years. They were only able to gain one seat. Much too much money and energy was spent on Hillary at the expense of key Congressional races.
Personally, I was rooting for Keith Ellison. His Muslim background had many Democrats questioning whether he was a wise choice. Ultimately, it is a DNC leader's organizational skills that should be the focus and Ellison gets high marks here. Perez is an unknown, having previously served as Obama's labor secretary, and never having run for elected office. Ellison has run successful US House campaigns in Minnesota's fifth district since 2006.
Perez represents a decided tilt toward Hispanic voters. He also has an excellent civil rights record, which should help placate the liberals that were behind Ellison, as he enthusiastically threw his support behind Perez.
This would normally not get so much attention, but the Democrats' poor showing last November has placed a lot of focus on the party leadership, which Sanders' supporters felt unfairly aided Hillary in the primaries. The DNC was forced to clean up its act after the allegations were verified by leaked e-mails. For Sanders' part, he wants to see the Democratic Party come together and push an agenda that favors the working class in this country.
Perez would like to return the party to its grass-roots base of 2008, which vaulted Obama to the presidency with a Congressional majority in tow. Ellison was looking to build off Sanders' momentum in 2016. It seems the Clinton era is finally over with Donna Brazille getting booed off the podium after announcing Perez's victory. Brazille had been a close ally of the Clintons for decades.
I imagine the Clintons think they can still exercise some influence over Perez, but I'm not so sure after hearing his speech. A bit too strident for my taste, but it is clear he wants to steer the party in a new direction.
The real test comes in 2018 with the midterm elections. It is crucial that the Democrats respond to Trump and turn over a highly unpopular Republican Congress, which appears frozen at the moment as to what direction to take, especially in regard to the Affordable Care Act. Now that he is out office, Boehner took a broader view on the battle over health care. It will be a tough fight for the Dems to retake the Senate, as only 8 Republicans are up for re-election, whereas 23 Democratic seats are at stake. Republicans have set their sights on 10 of those Democratic seats. Looks like Perez will need all the help he can get in what promises to be a very vicious election cycle.
Friday, February 24, 2017
I was tempted to listen to the evil Dr. Bannon at the CPAC pep rally but pretty much knew what to expect. CNN was literally dripping with anticipation last night as Bannon very rarely makes himself available to the public. He's one of those that likes to lurk behind the scenes, whispering his demented thoughts into the ears of political leaders, kind of like CPAC itself.
Stephen Bannon is only slightly more acceptable than Sean Hannity and Alex Jones, who apparently also has the President's ear. Bannon at least doesn't shout. Unfortunately, the agenda is pretty clear. Turn the notion of mainstream media on its ear, allowing for fringe media like that they represent to become part of the mainstream media. At that point, listeners will be completely confused as to what is real and what is fake, as it will be competing with each other every night for their attention. News will no longer have an ethical standard but will be judged by how many hits it gets on the social media.
It's pretty scary to think about, but this is the war on media that the Trump administration has unleashed. He has revealed his list of acceptable media sources and not surprisingly CNN, Washington Post and the New York Times are not on that list. They have essentially been blackballed. Alex Jones already claims his inflammatory InfoWars has been invited to White House Press Briefings. Who's to argue with him as he also claims that he and Trump are in constant communication?
The Conservative movement is currently in hyperdrive. The time is now for their full frontal assault on American society, turning the public against the "corporatist global media" as Bannon calls it. This would include Fox News and a number of other conservative corporate news syndicates, which own an alarming share of television and print media around the world, but Bannon wants everyone to know this is clearly a liberal cabal the Trump administration is fighting against.
Breitbart is kind of like Scientology. It grew out of the ravings of a mad man and now has a cult of followers. Bannon came to Breitbart after the founder's death in 2012 and quickly gained a far-reaching audience. He had been a relatively successful investment banker and minor media mogul before that. There was no way to imagine the kind of influence he would gain in 2016 when Trump made him head of his campaign.
Bannon regaled in all the wrong predictions and descriptions of their campaign in chaos, only to see the liberal media "crying and weeping" on election night. Their electoral victory is their validation in his mind, and many many people believe this. Certainly, the folks at CPAC, who like many conservative political action groups are now solidly behind Trump.
This really isn't much different than what went on in Germany in the 1930s. Bannon, who has long championed white supremacy no doubt has a soft spot for Hitler. One could argue that he is looking at this from a purely entertainment point of view, but the result is the same, he gave credence to white supremacy and other nationalist movements by constantly promoting them at Breitbart.
Of course, conservatives don't want to claim their ugly doppleganger. Instead, they try to project this latent fascism on liberals and it seems to be working among their followers. Why not? It worked for Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin and other autocratic leaders. Obviously, the evil Dr. Bannon has studied all this and distilled the essence into his twisted view of the role of media in shaping agenda.
If you incite enough riots and keep your minions relatively in check, most Americans will begin to identify with your message. This is the long range goal of the Trump administration. Berkeley was just a precursor. It didn't turn out quite as well as expected, but they will go after cities and universities that are declaring themselves "sanctuary cities," and make them look like they are the radical ones.
Bannon knows that as long as Trump keeps the alt-right conservative base happy, Republican leaders will be too afraid to challenge him. As unpopular as Trump is nationally, he is very popular among his base. An estimated 87 per cent of conservatives support his actions. No Republican leader is going to challenge numbers like that, except someone like John McCain, who has secured his Congressional seat for another six years.
We shouldn't think for a moment that these guys are stupid. Alt-right spin doctors like Bannon know exactly what they are doing and they are successfully turning this country against itself. It is hard to say what Bannon's level of convictions are -- whether this is all part of some Dominionist plot to plunge the country into chaos or just simply a means of attaining power and control. Whatever the case, he is looking more and more like Negan on Walking Dead. He will use whatever means at his disposal to secure that power in an autocratic state.
In that sense, he's not much different than Dick Cheney either, who tried to do the same in the Bush White House until his old ticker began to give out. Cheney had outsized influence during the first term, calling many of the shots in the White House. It was only when things began to deteriorate in Iraq that Bush lost faith in his partner, and sought advice from others.
However, Cheney and like-minded conservatives had successfully put an apparatus in place that would allow future conservative regimes to consolidate a disproportionate share of power in the executive branch. This is Homeland Security, which has a tremendous amount of authority. Obama warned us of this, but no one seemed to take note as Obama was relatively benevolent in his use of this power.
It is clear from the first few weeks of Trump's administration that he will not be so benevolent, using the full extent of his executive authority to push through an alt-right agenda, largely contrived by the evil Dr. Bannon on the campaign trail. Of course, CPAC and other conservative groups had a hand in it too, but it is Bannon who has cobbled together a wide-ranging agenda of conservative favorite themes into a more or less coherent package that is being serialized through executive orders. As such, the base of the Republican Party is thrilled as punch. This is what they had been promised for the past two decades, ever since the GOP first presented its "Contract with America."
One can't say that Republicans don't lack patience. They have kept to their agenda for the past 6 presidential administrations waiting for the propitious moment when they could finally enact it on a large scale. They had to content themselves with small victories at the state and national level during this time, but now all the forces appear to be in place for the final push. All we can hope for is that there will be sufficient enough reaction against this agenda in the next two years to reclaim at least one chamber of Congress in 2018, otherwise we could be in for a very long winter.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
or The Madness of King Trump
To this point, Mike Pence, or Mike "Pants" as my wife calls him, has been "good cop" to Trump's "bad cop" in the latest version of a Marvel crime fighting duo. However, it is starting to appear that Vice President Pence is cultivating larger aspirations. His European tour was a big hit, making a strong impression on European leaders and Bono alike for his level-headedness and commitment to international norms.
Meanwhile, the evil Dr. Bannon appears to be tending the stables of the Four Horses of the Apocalypse, waiting for that propitious moment to usher in Armageddon. Things didn't work out very well with one horsemen, Milo Yiannopoulos, who has been dumped after his comments on pedophilia. The conservatives' "boy toy" tried to start a riot at Cal-Berkeley only to see his own reputation go up in flames.
It is really hard to understand what is going on in this White House. There seem to be two main rival camps, one led by Pence and the other by Bannon. Some say there is also a Priebus camp, a hybrid camp if you will, that tries to act as the middle way. Then there is the family camp led by Jared and Ivanka, which holds considerable sway, Trump being the family man that he is. There also appears to be rogue warriors like Kellyanne Conway, anxious to carve out her own niche in the White House.
Increasingly, Mike Pence is emerging as the most reasonable voice emanating from the White House, offering assurances after his commander-in-chief's twitter-tantrums. How much influence Pence really has is a matter of speculation, but it seems to be growing as more persons are turning to him to bring stability to the chaos that has plagued His Trumpness's first month in office.
I get the sneaky suspicion a coup is in the works. Republican Senate leaders appear to have had their fill of Trump and are now looking for a way to get rid of him. Pence is clearly their man. The only potential problem is how much the former Congressman and Indiana governor was involved in the shenanigans surrounding Mike Flynn. He claims to have been out of the loop completely, but a thorough investigation may say otherwise. If Mr. Pence emerges as the only clean member of this foul administration, he is the heir apparent to the oval office, because it seems Congress is finally gearing up for full investigations into Russiagate.
Trump is obviously deranged. His presser and subsequent rally in Florida sealed the deal. The Sweden gaffe is the worst yet, as it has led to a flood of tweets, including several from the former Swedish PM, and an amusing video mocking His Trumpness. He has truly become an international embarrassment. He had to postpone his planned visit to the UK to avoid further embarrassment. Nevertheless, the core of the conservative electorate sticks with him, completely absorbed in his madness. So, Republicans have to tread softly so as not to risk an ugly uprising in their party that could spark violent clashes.
Fortunately for them, Pence is seen as a pillar of the religious conservative community and an acceptable alternative to King Trump. Congressional Republicans would love to ease Trump out and not have to go through the ugly spectacle of an impeachment.
But, here they run into the evil Dr. Bannon, who is not going to go down quietly. He has been pulling the levers from day one, trying to keep Trump in line with the alt-right world that he justifiably believes is who put him into the White House in the first place. But, Trump is wavering, as he is forced to come to terms with the enormity of his responsibilities. He can no longer simply sign off on Bannon's hastily contrived executive orders, as they not only have failed to hold up in court but literally drive a knife right down the middle of the country. So, Trump is beginning to defer more and more to other counsel, marginalizing Bannon and the radical conservatism he represents. Still, the evil doctor has strong influence as witnessed at the Florida rally, a tailor-made event to satisfy the alt-right.
This will be a huge test of the GOP. A successful transition of power from Trump to Pence would bring a measure of stability back to the Republican Party and restore faith in America as a global leader. Trump has sorely tested the world's patience, even that of Putin.
Maybe this was the game plan all along, it was just that the evil Dr. Bannon wasn't privy to it? We can only wait and see how it plays out.
Sunday, February 19, 2017
It seems 45 has unwittingly inspired a book club -- not the kind he would probably give a thumb's up too as many of the titles are apocalyptic in theme. One of the books that has emerged at the top of the list is Sinclair Lewis' It Can't Happen Here. It used to be fun back in the old days to speculate what the country would be like under a "bumbling, repressive and democratically elected American President," safe in the belief we would never be so easily deceived. But, sadly it has happened.
The book followed pretty closely on the heels of the elevation of Hitler to Chancellor of Germany in 1933. Other tyrants had come to power in Italy and Spain but there wasn't much of a democratic process in these countries, as they came to power through civil war. Germany accepted Hitler, although at the time of Lewis' writing it was hard to tell how bad things would turn out.
That's kind of where we are now. Trump is more laughing stock than tyrant, but given time he has the ability to consolidate power and the result could be much more grim, which is what transpired in the second half of Lewis' book as President Windrip strengthened his grip on power. A prescient book in that it was written four years before war broke out in Europe, and an instructive one given the increasingly uncivil environment we find ourselves currently living in.
We've definitely had our share of populist candidates over the years, but they had either self-destructed on the campaign trail or the public grew weary of them and they failed to carry their candidacy all the way through to the end. Trump is new ground, and one we must wrestle to come to terms with, which is why so many book references are coming up.
It's just too bad we have a president who doesn't read. Maybe then he would be more aware of the limits of power. Alas, this is a man who has never had to want for anything in his 70 years on earth, born into an extremely wealthy New York family and given all the fine things in life from a very early age. The world was literally his oyster.
When Megyn Kelly asked Trump what his favorite book was (21:15 mark), he said All Quiet on the Western Front. She asked him what he was currently reading and all he could come up with was that he read "passages." No book in specific. He rarely offers a quote from a book and when he does he usually botches it, as was the case when he tried to reference a chapter from the Bible at a Liberty University rally. In true Trump fashion, he blamed his adviser Tony Perkins for the mistake.
George Bush had been similarly derided for not being much of a reader, although Karl Rove would have us believe the President read 90 books per year. I don't think Rove thought about the math here, as that would mean almost two books per week, which would make Bush a veritable book worm. Bush had a similar problem as Trump when asked to cite his favorite childhood book and came up with The Very Hungry Caterpillar, which was first published in 1969, when W was 23 years old. In all fairness, it was probably a book he read to his girls later on.
Trump hasn't been pressed too much on his reading habits. He's given the press much more to chew on. But, I think it is cause to worry. Most presidents have been avid readers, whether it was to provide a literary escape from the duties of their office, or to help inform them on issues and cultural events they had to address. The one and only book Trump has repeatedly referenced is his own, The Art of the Deal, although one has to wonder if he even read it as it was ghostwritten by Tony Schwartz.
In fairness to our President, I tried to read his "classic work." It is an insufferable account of Trump's daily habits that offers very little in the way of insights, other than the degree of his narcissism. You would be much better off reading John Brooks' Business Adventures, which is considered a classic by many in the business world, including Warren Buffett and Bill Gates.
Now that we are in presidential territory, you would think that our commander-in-chief would at least pick up a biography about a past president that inspires him. He claims to be a big fan of Andrew Jackson, which leads one to suggest The Age of Jackson by Arthur Schlesinger, but Trump is probably waiting until Bill O'Reilly catches up with Jackson is his serial killing series. Baba has already provided him Lincoln, Kennedy and Reagan to pour over. However, the best we can hope for is that 45 might check out the movie on cable, but that too is unlikely as he is drawn mostly to fake news and reality shows.
Sadly, in his own odd way he reflects the tastes of his electorate. You would never think a young man who grew up in a wealthy New York family and went to one of the "best business schools" would turn out to have the intellectual curiosity of Al Bundy.
Friday, February 17, 2017
It was a pretty simple thing to do. Just go in front of the press and announce his new pick for Secretary of Labor, say a few complimentary things about him, and quietly bid adieu. But, His Trumpness wasn't going to let it go at that.
The first indication this was going to get messy was all of his handlers preceding him, but no sign of "Alex" Acosta. They all dutifully sat in the front row to give their president emotional support. I had thought Trump would stick to theme, as he initially spoke so calmly. I tuned away only to come back twenty minutes later to hear him ranting about the classified information that had been illegally leaked out of his administration. Not just the leaked phone calls of Mike Flynn, but that of his conversations with the Presidents of Mexico and Australia, all of which he claimed were misrepresented in the press, or to use his phrase, "real leaks, fake news."
It was clear to everyone his conversation with President Pena Nieto went off the rails, as has been everything concerning his relationship with Mexico, since he tweeted it himself! Nieto tweeted in return as this now seems to be the official line of communication with the White House. Whatever occurred in "private" only reinforced this deep chill in relations, as Nieto is having to defend himself against the public outcry back home.
The Prime Minister of Australia was more conciliatory, saying His Trumpness didn't hang up on him, but chose not to elaborate, indicating a rather chilly call over the 1250 refugees. Trump tweeted he was very upset over the "dumb deal" the Obama administration had struck last year.
In regard to the disgraced General Flynn, he basically lauded his actions, saying he would have directed Flynn to contact Russian leaders if the former general had not done so on his own volition. Trump's only qualm, apparently, is that Flynn wasn't forthright with Vice President Pence. He blamed the media for blowing the story out of all bounds and forcing him to have to ask for Flynn's resignation. A rather strange admission to say the least.
His Trumpness was only warming up. He launched a full scale attack on the media, CNN in particular, as purveyors of fake news. When the more audacious reporters challenged him, such as his claim that he had the biggest electoral victory since Reagan, he retreated ever so slightly, claiming that was how it was presented to him. Not his mistake mind you, but one of his handlers. You figure it was probably one of those sitting on the front row who he was glaring at.
The creme de la creme of the evening came when a black reporter asked him if he would include the CBC in discussions of his agenda for addressing urban policy. Oblivious to what the acronym referred to, he asked her to set up a meeting for him. She was referring to the Congressional Black Caucus. Mind you, this is a guy who claimed he would win 95% of the black vote in 2020.
Of course, CNN had a field day with the press conference afterward, as did all the other networks. Surprisingly, it was Shep Smith of Fox who was the most animated, castigating Trump for his demonstrable lies. No wonder Trump limited his praise of Fox to the syndicated morning show, Fox and Friends.
On CNN, one commentator opined that the Trump administration was missing Hillary, as she had been such an easy target. Hala Gorani noted that he evoked her name 6 or 7 times during the press conference, but that it was obvious the media was now his central target. That and the judiciary, the commentator noted, although he did not believe Trump's attack on the judiciary would earn him the public's favor.
The King of Orange also lambasted the New York Times and Washington Post for leaking the leaks from his White House, calling it false reporting. How can something be false if the leaks were real? I suppose he meant to say that the Times and Post shouldn't have published these leaks out of deference to his administration, but what if any deference has he given to these journals?
The more he attacks the media, the more the media comes back at him, leading one to suspect this is what he wants. It seems to play well with his constituency, which gets its news primarily through the social media. Trump has set up a highly divisive atmosphere, which led Charlie Daniels to opin "it's only a matter of time before there is blood on the streets," evoking the Civil War in a very strange commentary for the Cybercast News Service, or CNS News as it likes to call itself. It is unclear in that missive who Daniels is blaming for this discord, but it is safe to say it is not Trump.
Trump has created a wall that runs right down the middle of the country. One he plans to exploit with "campaign-like" rallies to take his message to his people. Both sides have dug in their heels and are preparing for rhetorical war, which hopefully will only result in bruised egos. Obviously, it was a big blow for Trump to lose Flynn and Puzder in the same week. He had barely survived an attack on his Secretary of Education last week. His designated EPA chief is also under fire.
If Trump was the conciliatory man he claims to be, he would have picked an experienced, moderate Republican like Alexander Acosta to begin with, not a pathetic fast food mogul, whose idea of labor is having pin-up models like Kate Upton fake an orgasm over his burgers. This is not Celebrity CEO Apprentice. It is his duty to pick qualified individuals to lead his cabinet. Unfortunately, the Republican Party stood ready to ram Puzder through anyway, until it looked like they would be one or two votes short and couldn't count on Mike Pence to break the tie.
The GOP doesn't seem to realize that Trump makes them look every bit as foolish by not challenging him. I understand they are afraid the underbelly of their party will turn on them in the upcoming midterms, but surely there are enough moderate Republicans and Independents out there to counter the redneck vote! What happened to the Party of Reagan and Eisenhower and Teddy Roosevelt?
Instead, Trump pays deference to Andrew Jackson, a Democrat who he obviously hasn't read anything about much less understands. Morning Joe called Trump out on this highly questionable affection for Jackson in the midst of his rant on Stephen Miller, one of Trump's handlers present in the front row.
At what point has Trump gone too far? For many it was this press conference, but it remains to be seen how the once Grand Ol' Party will react.
Monday, February 13, 2017
I've never been to Ljubljana but they tell me it is nice. Slovenia managed to escape the Yugoslavian blood bath relatively unscarred. It was the first of the former Yugolav republics to join the EU in 2004, and has enjoyed a steadily growing economy ever since.
Melania left her homeland before the break up, becoming a model in Italy and eventually migrating to the US on an H-1B visa, where she hit her stride in New York. She met the Donald within two years of her arrival. Trump helped her get a green card, thanks to her "extraordinary ability" as a model, and within a few years became his wife.
One can't imagine that Pootie foresaw all these things happening. Hell, he wasn't even President in 1996 when Melania first came to America. But, he was Deputy Chief of the Presidential Property Management Department, responsible for the transfer of foreign properties from the former Soviet Union to the new Russian Federation. There is also that KGB past, which we know so little about, but one can imagine all sorts of things, including setting up deep cover agents in the US. A practice that inspired the television series The Americans.
Trump had previously preferred blondes, but somehow Melania caught his eye. As the story goes, they met at the Kit Kat Club, a theater that had gone under several names but was then being used for the popular revival of Cabaret. Apropos, one might say. The Donald was reeling from his separation from Marla Maples, so he probably wanted someone who didn't remind him of her, so why not a long-legged brunette with a thick Eastern European accent?
A lot of these deep cover agents were used to infiltrate the business sector, and Trump was the King of New York real estate, at least in his own mind. He was also toying around with the idea of a presidential run on Ross Perot's Reform Party ticket. So, he would have been a good score for a sexy spy.
Russia is always looking for useful idiots, and they seem to have found one in Trump. A savvy young woman like Melania would have little trouble massaging the Donald's ego and getting him to do someone else's bidding. One can even imagine Trump calling her his "little Ninotchka." What I have found most amazing during the campaign and first weeks in the White House is how easily he is led by others, especially for someone who prides himself on being his own man. All you have to do is flatter him and you have his ear.
It seems the Donald may finally be wisening up a little, especially given his unflattering poll numbers. This is a man who wants to be loved, as old pal Howard Stern noted, and these bad ratings are killing him. He desperately needs something to boost his presidential cred and it seems Vlad has come to help him out, offering a meeting in Ljubljana to provide his sagging presidency the gravitas it is sorely lacking.
For Melania it will be a homecoming. Ljubljana is thrilled as punch to have one of its own in the White House. So much so that local residents are brandishing their products with her name, which has caused some branding concerns.
It's too bad Spy magazine is no longer around. They would have had a field day with this connection.
Sunday, February 12, 2017
It's not surprising that a man with a very litigious past would find himself at odds with the federal courts so early in his term. However, you would think he had lawyers who understood the Constitution enough to craft executive orders that weren't so easily shot down in court. In fairness, he probably thought Jeff Sessions' boys knew the Constitution and trusted them when they drafted his "travel ban,"
It is an ideologically-driven executive order, not a Constitutionally-based one, using September 11, 2001, as its benchmark. There is no specific act referenced that would explain why he chose to target seven countries that had absolutely nothing to do with 911. He doesn't even mention the countries by name but rather refers to section 217(a)(12) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187 (a)(12), which is a 2015 Terrorist Travel Prevention Act that was rushed through Congress and signed by President Obama in response to the Paris and San Bernardino attacks that year. However, this Act, which Trump's lawyers use as a precedent, didn't physically stop persons from these countries to enter the US, but rather tightened security background checks on these specific foreign nationals.
I suppose if you are trying to convince your electorate of the need for a 90-day travel ban, this kind of specious argument would fly, but you can't expect a Federal Appeals Court to be as easily convinced. Trump of course was furious, so much so that he threatened to take his case to a "real court," by which we can only assume the Supreme Court. However, there are still only 8 members on the Supreme Court, and at best the White House could only hope for a 4-4 tie, which isn't enough to strike down the Appeals Court decision. Sorry, Mike Pence can't cast the deciding vote.
Trump's legal team beat a retreat for now, withdrawing in its den to write a new executive order that won't have so much questionable language. However, it is hard to imagine they will do much better a second time around, as it will be pretty hard to remove the ideological blinders. His administration is convinced of the moral imperative of such a ban, and is looking to create far greater restrictions on immigration. Congressional Republicans want to cut legal immigration in half. One can only assume the undesirables are seen as being predominantly Muslim, but the language will have to avoid a religious litmus test, otherwise these executive orders and bills will be shot down in court once again.
What is odd about all this is that Muslims represent a sliver of the American population. By Census counts, Muslims represent less than one per cent of the population, and many of these Muslims are converts like Kareem Abdul Jabbar. So, the actual number of Muslims hailing from a foreign country is much less. Yet, we are led to think by the endless stream of memes on social media that there is this yuge existential threat that Muslims will take over towns, cities and even states with Sharia Law.
One town actually was taken over by Muslims -- Hamtramck, Michigan -- and so far there has been no significant changes in the local laws or the general pace of life for that matter. But, the conservative blogs have jumped all over this, claiming that the newly elected city council started enforcing Sharia Law immediately.
It's a slippery slope because most of us have no idea where Hamtramck is, much less follow what is going on. We take whatever information we get from sources we trust. So, our views are reinforced one way or the other. This is what the Trump administration is relying on. They hope to make news as obscure, unclear and as unintelligible as possible so that we as Americans will have no idea which end is up anymore. This is the road descending into fascism.
Fortunately, we still have the courts to block such efforts, but that doesn't stop His Trumpness from besmirching them and if given enough time stacking them in his favor. He doesn't seem to have a very willing ally in Neil Gorsuch, who took offense to the President's characterization of the Federal Appeals Court of San Francisco.
This should be a cue to Trump to lay off, but as we know The King of Orange is not one to back away from a fight. He will take his case to The People's Court if necessary. Lest we make too much humor out of this situation, we shouldn't forget that we have four very contentious years ahead of us and every battle counts!
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Why is it you get the feeling there is a photograph of Putin hanging in the Oval Office? Has there ever been a President who lavished so much praise on a contemporary foreign leader, refusing to even engage in criticism of the Russian president? Trump dodged the question during his Super Bowl interview with Baba O'Reilly, essentially saying we all have blood on our hands.
There is no enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend thing going on here. If that was the case, Trump would be much more friendly toward Iranian leaders, as they are fighting ISIS too. No, Trump has genuine admiration for the Russian strongman. He sees him as a role model for his own administration, hoping to consolidate as much power as he can into the executive branch to carry out Steve Bannon's agenda.
Of course, there's that thing about the dossier on Trump's compromising situation with the Kremlin, which was put together by a former MI6 operative working for the Democratic National Committee. Most of the allegations have been refuted, but it continues to haunt him as there are well-documented financial ties to Russian investors that the Kremlin can just as easily use as leverage.
Whatever the case, it seems Putin is losing his patience with Trump, as there seems to be no movement on lifting sanctions or pulling NATO troops out of Poland and the Baltic states, which are high on the Kremlin's wish list. The Kremlin was also irked by Baba's line of questioning. They would like to see Trump establish some order out of his chaotic start.
In all fairness, Putin got off to a rough start as well. He had to deal with a sunken sub, terrorist attacks on a theater and school, and explosions in Moscow apartment blocks within his first term of office. All this while dealing with a badly sinking economy. None of these incidents were handled particularly well, but eventually Vlad got the hang of things and brought some measure of order to the chaos that enveloped Russia at the dawn of the new millennium.
However, His Trumpness couldn't have inherited a more stable situation. The former president left the White House in order, the economy is growing, and jobs are being created at their highest level in over a decade. Russia also seems to have ISIS contained in Syria. The Dow even reacted positively to his election, soaring to the unprecedented height of 20,000.
This is no nation in decline, but rather one enjoying a robust recovery. All Trump had to do was sit back and enjoy the ride. Instead, he decided to make his imprint as quickly as possible, issuing a slough of executive orders, none of which included the lifting of Russian sanctions. What is Vlad to think?
His Trumpness broached the subject, but seems to be deferring to his generals on this, particularly Gen. Mattis, who also thinks NATO is just fine as it is and should maintain its line of defense along the Polish-Baltic States border. Trump himself gave Ukraine assurances that he would not be lifting Russian sanctions anytime soon. As a result, Putin is preparing for war. A rather ominous sign given that Trump based much of his campaign on restoring amicable relations with Russia.
We can only speculate what took place during the much-anticipated phone call with Vladimir Putin. Trump didn't slam the phone down in anger like he did with the Australian prime minister over accepting 1250 refugees stuck in limbo in the Pacific. So, one assumes it went reasonably well. That's certainly what both administrations reported. So, why did Vlad put his air force on high alert? Again, we can only speculate.
So far, no direction has emerged from the Trump White House. He seems to mostly be catering to his conservative base in executive orders aimed at fulfilling campaign promises. The idea of a new affordable care act has been put indefinitely on hold. Congress is now talking about "repairing" the existing act rather than tossing it out completely, as they don't seem to have any back-up plan. Maybe they finally took the time to read it and find out that much of the ACA is based on a Heritage Foundation plan written back in 1989? Even the name was taken from this old conservative blueprint.
Trump did get another photo opportunity with a big computer tech company, introducing 10,000 new "long-term jobs." These jobs have been in the pipeline quite a long time. However, Intel CEO Brian Krzanich graciously credited Trump for them.
But, again, when are we going to see this great Detente between the US and Russia?
Wednesday, February 8, 2017
Saturday Night Live is enjoying its best television ratings in more than two decades, thanks to their ongoing satirical look at the Trump administration. The latest addition is a caricature of Sean Spicer, by Melissa McCarthy, which is brutal. Needless to say, this isn't going down well with Emperor Trump, who continues to admonish the show every chance he gets.
He is apparently so angry over the Spicer sketch that he can't even summon up a tweet in response. Instead, we get some juicy insider info that Trump may dump Spicer over the sketch, as it makes him look weak. If that isn't bad enough, SNL is considering Rosie O'Donnell for the part of Steve Bannon, who to this point has been portrayed as the grim reaper. So, Herr Trump may not want to set a precedent with poor Sean, who took the caricature in stride at Monday's press conference.
It is hard to tell whether Trump really can't stand people making fun of him, or if he is the Rodney Dangerfield of Presidents? I suppose he does feel that his new role as President warrants more respect, but Trump had to know that this kind of satire came with the job. Maybe he is just trying to boost NBC's ratings? Whatever the case, it isn't going to stop now that SNL is seeing its ratings soar.
Across the board, comics are having a field day with all things Trump. Stephen Colbert took a shot at his Super Bowl interview, which drew a lot of fire for his unwillingness to criticize Vladimir Putin. The interview itself was quite comical, as Baba O'Reilly went way out on a limb to try to get Trump to embrace the conservative view that Putin is our arch-enemy. As far as Trump is concerned, we are all "killers."
SNL has become the alt-Trump channel, zeroing in on just about every aspect of his administration. However, one has to ask if they risk "normalizing" Trump? Tina Fey felt she had to walk away from her Sarah Palin caricature because it had become all consuming and actually gave Palin more credibility than she deserved. Trump, being the entertainer that he is, probably realizes this and is egging the show on.
From day one, Trump made it clear the only Americans he is interested in are the ones who voted for him. This endless ridicule only serves to strengthen his base of support. Our mirth is actually his gain, as he can say to his base, "look at these guys. They have no respect for me, ergo they have no respect for you."
Alas, this is true. It is hard to have much respect for an electorate that could vote for such a guy. The only problem is that these persons are not easily shamed. In fact, they wear the ridicule like a red badge of courage, as we saw with Hillary's "basket of deplorables" quote, which they took as their label.
What to do? Many of us need this humor to help ease the pain of his administration. It isn't even a month old and already it feels like he has undid everything over the past 8 years and beyond. Meanwhile, our former President is learning how to kite surf with Richard Branson. We can only wish we could be so chill, especially since most of us are having to endure an especially cold February.
Fortunately, our federal courts are proving they still uphold the Constitution, blocking his ill-advised travel ban. Trump plans to appeal the restraining order all the way to the Supreme Court, but he is not likely to get a fifth conservative judge anytime soon. Roberts and Kennedy aren't exactly sure votes anyway.
This is a welcome relief given a GOP Congress that is unwilling to challenge Trump, even when it comes to someone as hopelessly incompetent to administer her cabinet post as Betsy DeVos. She slid through the Senate 51-50, with VP Mike Pence breaking the deadlock, as only two Republicans chose to break ranks. I suppose the Republicans fear the wrath of Trump voters. Judges don't have such worries, but how long before he stacks the courts in his favor?
The satire would be even better if it went beyond the superficial ticks of this administration and began to explore the deeper underlying concerns of his administration, but I suppose that is too much to ask of SNL writers. We can always turn to Andy Borowitz.