Skip to main content

Remembering Hitch

By


Christopher Hitchens loved his booze and cigarettes.  He felt that it gave him an edge when it came to writing copy.  Charlie Rose had Salman Rushdie, Martin Amis, Ian McEwan and James Fenton on the other night discussing this and other aspects of Hitch's life.   They all spoke very warmly of him, especially Amis, who was one of his dearest friends.  Hitch apparently liked to tease him in saying that they had an unconsummated gay marriage.  Fenton noted Hitch's incorrigible "flirting" and the way he liked to entertain opposing views.  His Washington parties would have persons from across the political spectrum.  He loved being in the thick of things, among those who shaped policies, but at the same time would fly over at a moment's notice to be with one of his friends when he needed him.  Rushdie noted that Hitch stood by him throughout the fatwa ordeal and defended him against Le Carre when the two of them had their big row.  They all said he made a big mistake in supporting the Iraq War, although they didn't get much into his so-called "power of facing," and how he tried to link his "awakening" with that of Orwell.   But, in the end he redeemed himself and became the darling of the liberal media once again.  Of course when he writes articles like this one on self-improvement, how can you resist?
Labels:

Comments

  1. avrdsApril 17, 2012 at 3:45 PM

    I still want to read Hitch. Even though I disagreed with him often, I like someone who can intelligently argue a point of view. He had more wit than the entire Bush administration's half wits combined.

    I often wondered where that photo of him came from. I took it to be one more sign of his complete unashamed arrogance. But it looks like it's that and his wicked sense of humor. That series looks great -- will definitely read. The photos alone are amazing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. James FergusonApril 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM

    He's one of those guys I can only take in small doses. He had a strong intellect but his arrogance often ruined it, as far as I was concerned. Comparing himself to Orwell over the Iraq War was complete balderdash! Orwell actually fought in the Spanish Civil War, not to mention they took diametric opposite positions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. avrdsApril 17, 2012 at 4:30 PM

    I just read that series on self improvement. I laughed so hard in places, I was crying. Weird to read it now, too, knowing what we know and he doesn't.

    He was a brilliant man who sometimes took opposing points of view just out of boredom -- see his comment about arguing about smoking. His support of the war was inexplicable, but then he wasn't exactly predictable on any front. Who knows what went on in that crazy head of his.

    ReplyDelete
  4. James FergusonApril 17, 2012 at 5:33 PM

    At first I thought he just wanted to be contrary, but then he came out with that book, "Why Orwell Matters?" which indicated he really seemed to think he had an inside track on this one.

    Amis also commented on Hitch's atheism. He said it seemed a bit over the top, especially since he argued so vociferously against the absolutism of the Church. He felt agnosticism was a better position to take as atheism appears to connote you know something no one else does and given the expansive nature of universe, well that's a bit arrogant.

    But, they all felt that being arrogant was a major part of his personality, and without he wouldn't have been the figure he was.

    ReplyDelete
  5. avrdsApril 18, 2012 at 3:49 AM

    It is sort of weird to open this site and see Hitchens in his bathroom .... Definitely provocative even in death.

    As for his arrogance, I think he showed his Achilles heel when he bought into the anti-Islamist propaganda after 9/11. As an atheist myself, I can understand his dismissal of religious zealots of all stripes, but I think he was sold a bill of goods.

    I heard him later talking about Saddam's attacks on his own people, etc., but that's not what motivated the invasion and occupation of Iraq and he must have -- or at least should have -- known that. He was a very smart man.

    I've become quite the fan of the new Bill Moyer's show who last week featured Paul Volker who wasn't half bad, I have to admit, but Carne Ross was amazing. He certainly saw through the rush to war from Britain's side. Why Hitchens didn't (or refused to acknowledge it) is a real mystery.

    ReplyDelete
  6. James FergusonApril 18, 2012 at 7:13 AM

    He loved an argument. I think this is one motivated him. The atheism, as you say, is more a reaction to the Catholic Church and religious zealots that attempt to sway politics. I figured this was more a position than a belief on his part as well. He wrote some highly provocative articles and books on the subject, more akin to Thomas Paine, with whom I imagine he shared an affinity with, than George Orwell.

    ReplyDelete
  7. avrdsApril 18, 2012 at 3:57 PM

    Some of my time should be freeing up soon, so I'll try to pick up a copy of his essays. Some or most of them are probably available online. Maybe we can read a couple.

    ReplyDelete
  8. James FergusonApril 18, 2012 at 10:23 PM

    It would be fun. There are his memoirs, Hitch-22,

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/02/books/02book.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
229 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Searchers

By
You are invited to join us in a discussion of  The Searchers , a new book on John Ford's boldest Western, which cast John Wayne against type as the vengeful Ethan Edwards who spends eight years tracking down a notorious Comanche warrior, who had killed his cousins and abducted a 9 year old girl.  The film has had its fair share of detractors as well as fans over the years, but is consistently ranked in most critics'  Top Ten Greatest Films . Glenn Frankel examines the origins of the story as well as the film itself, breaking his book down into four parts.  The first two parts deal with Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, perhaps the most famous of the 19th century abduction stories.  The short third part focuses on the author of the novel, Alan Le May, and how he came to write The Searchers. The final part is about Pappy and the Duke and the making of the film. Frankel noted that Le May researched 60+ abduction stories, fusing them together into a nar...
123 comments
Read more