Skip to main content

Say it isn't so, Mamet?

By

Seems David Mamet has had quite a change of heart these past few years, as he rails against "liberalism" in his new book, The Secret Knowledge: On the Dismantling of American Culture.  This is something you would expect from Regnery Publishing, not an award-winning playwright and film maker who has given us some very thought-provoking plays and films over the years.  David Ulin writes in his review that most of Mamet's arguments are all too easy to refute, leaving me to wonder what "secret knowledge" he is privy to that the rest of us are not, or if this is dementia setting in early.
Labels:

Comments

  1. NebrisAugust 24, 2011 at 4:44 PM

    He's not the first Young Firebrand to become a cranky altakaka. Remember most of the Neo-Cons started off as Trotskites. It seems a special affliction of Jewish intellectuals, their heritage steeped in Talmudic thinking. Such can produce genius as if from an assemble line, yet its relentless parsing can lead to endless conflict. Golda Meir once said, "If the Arabs really wanted to destroy us, they'd leave us alone." I suspect Mr. Mamet has internally painted himself into a corner and it has driven him mad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. avrdsAugust 24, 2011 at 4:51 PM

    GREAT line from Meir.

    Mamet has taken an antagonist role in one of his own quirky plays.

    ReplyDelete
  3. James FergusonAugust 25, 2011 at 9:00 AM

    Nice to see your comment, Nebris. Mamet's stated positions remind me a lot of Ron Silver. I suppose there is something left of a "liberal establishment" in Hollywood, although not much judging by the types of films that have come out in recent decades. Nevertheless, I imagine those Hollywood parties can become a bore with all the political correctness, and so Mamet feels need to vent. Judging by the review, it doesn't seem Mamet has exhibited much awareness for America beyond Hollywood.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rick DiguetteAugust 27, 2011 at 7:16 PM

    I'm not sure Mamet was ever the liberal some people seem to think he was. In plays like American Buffalo and Glengarry Glen Ross, he took a very blue collar or proletarian approach in his criticsm of capitalism. He decried how it tended to damage both buyers and sellers, to make unwitting enemies of them. But reading his plays and writing about them, I never got the feeling that he thought some sort of move to European style socialism was the answer. Even in this new book, which I haven't read, I get the feeling that he is more interested in exposing the shibboleths that we allow ourselves to be enslaved by. The fact that he is now taking aim at liberals may be only because he sees them as an easier target.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more