Skip to main content

The New Novel

By


I thought Michael Gorra's chapter Maupassant (from Portrait of a Novel) on the concerns of women reading novels was priceless, and so well explored.  Apparently, it was seen by many as illicit for women to read novels, especially questionable novels.  As a result, many French novels and stories were banned in translation, including many of Maupassant's short stories.  It took over 30 years for Flaubert's Madame Bovary to find its way into English print.  Zola was considered outright pornographic.

While the situation had relaxed a little in Henry James's time, he consciously set Isabel Archer's arrival in Paris in 1872, only a year after the Paris Commune, the fourth revolution to rock France.  One can imagine Isabel like one of Homer's women, having secretly read novels, maybe even French novels, but still blushing when she reached Paris.  James didn't revel in sexuality like Flaubert and Zola, but he did explore its tensions.

According to Gorra, the author more fully exploited sexuality in later novels like The Americans and The Golden Bowl, but like George Eliot preferred to deal with the consequences rather than the acts themselves.  This was generally true for English writing.  Even Thomas Hardy dealt more with consequences as seen in Tess of the d'Urbervilles.

Not so for the French writers, who reveled in brothel scenes and other carnal delights, allowing their women to experience much more pleasure than could be found in English novels, which no doubt would have made them quite tempting to read in their time.

It makes you wonder what Winslow Homer chose for his young lady in red.  The theme seemed to delight him, as he painted several young ladies reading novels, including this one of a young woman reading under an oak tree, with red once again figuring into the image.


Comments

  1. TripplerNovember 7, 2013 at 7:10 PM

    Very interesting!

    As for me, I'm reading something a bit more wholesome:

    Betty Smith's "A Tree Grows In Brooklyn"


    Most kids I grew up with read the book back in the 1960s. I did not though I read Mark Twain (his books were not well liked by my classmates back then - still dunno why). The book remains a good read after all these years. Will also watch the old movie based on the book in a short while.

    ReplyDelete
  2. James FergusonNovember 8, 2013 at 5:11 PM

    I'm starting Middlemarch.

    ReplyDelete
  3. avrdsNovember 8, 2013 at 6:14 PM

    I would join you if I could (maybe after the first of the year). Here's an interesting mini-overview of the book:

    http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/nov/21/heroines-garden/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

The People Debate the Constitution

By
As Pauline Maier describes in Ratification , there was no easy road in getting the Constitution ratified.  After 10 years of living together as a loosely knit confederation, a few forward thinking men decided that the Articles of Confederation no longer worked and it was time to forge a Constitution.  Washington would not go until he could be assured something would come of the convention and that there would be an august body of gentlemen to carry the changes through.  But, ultimately Maier describes it was the people who would determine the fate of the new Constitution. This is a reading group for Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution 1787-1788 .  The book has been well received by fellow historians like Jack Rakove , among others.  Maier has drawn from a wealth of research piecing together a story that tells the arduous battle in getting the Constitution ratified.  A battle no less significant than that Americans fought for independence.
166 comments
Read more