Skip to main content

A Prayer for the Dying

Maybe a bit on the morbid side, but sounds like a fascinating study of the Civil War just the same:


Faust shows [in This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War] how American institutions adapted to the staggering burden of this new kind of war and wholesale death with a blend of can-do humanitarianism, pragmatic improvisation, mawkish sentimentality, political cant, commercial hucksterism and downright fraud. Freelance embalmers flocked to battlefields in the aftermath of the fighting. "Bodies taken from Antietam Battle Field and delivered to Cars or Express Office at short notice and low rates," read the business card of one entrepreneur. "Bodies Embalmed by us NEVER TURN BLACK! But retain their natural color and appearance," boasted another. In 1863, a Washington undertaker was imprisoned on charges of making a practice of recovering and embalming dead soldiers without permission and then extorting payment from families that wanted the bodies returned.

Faust convincingly demonstrates that the trauma of the Civil War revolutionized the American military's approach to caring for the dead and notifying families. After the war, a massive and superbly organized effort by the War Department to recover, identify and rebury Union dead in newly established national cemeteries was an act of atonement for the nation's failings during the war itself.

Comments

  1. Gintaras, I started this last winter and, yes, it is fascinating and, yes, it is morbid.

    Unlike Blight's book that also deals with death during the Civil War, I had a very hard time with this one and finally put it aside. Too gruesome. Maybe if I finish it in the summer, when life isn't so dark anyway, it might be a better idea.

    It's had amazing reviews, so I'm sure it's worth sticking with it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A short reading and excerpt from the book here:

    http://www.nationalbook.org/nba2008_nf_faust.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. Re "how American institutions adapted to the staggering burden of this new kind of war and wholesale death"

    I'm staggering from reading early parts of "Team of Rivals"--overwhelmed by the number/rate of deaths of women! DCan't help wondering if the Civil War raised the rate of male deaths to that of female deaths?

    On a related note, no wonder the men turned to each other for intimate relationships--more chance of them lasting a while?

    ReplyDelete
  4. New York, it is amazing to read about someone like Chase who lost what... three wives? And most of his children? It is hard to imagine the amount of suffering that families went through during that period.

    On the other side, I've always wondered about the cost of war on women, since they are the survivors. When I was looking at the effects of the war on western exploration, I didn't find all that much written about women. Maybe I need to go back and take a closer look at Faust's book -- although it is a tough read. I don't recommend it for the dark days of winter.

    Interesting thought about why men might bond early in life to avoid this kind of grief. I'm really interested in Robert's thoughts about the Rotundo book once he gets to it.

    Speaking of books, glad you found one, New York. It's a good one, isn't it!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

The People Debate the Constitution

As Pauline Maier describes in Ratification , there was no easy road in getting the Constitution ratified.  After 10 years of living together as a loosely knit confederation, a few forward thinking men decided that the Articles of Confederation no longer worked and it was time to forge a Constitution.  Washington would not go until he could be assured something would come of the convention and that there would be an august body of gentlemen to carry the changes through.  But, ultimately Maier describes it was the people who would determine the fate of the new Constitution. This is a reading group for Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution 1787-1788 .  The book has been well received by fellow historians like Jack Rakove , among others.  Maier has drawn from a wealth of research piecing together a story that tells the arduous battle in getting the Constitution ratified.  A battle no less significant than that Americans fought for independence.