Skip to main content

United States of America v. Citizens United



All the Kochs' money and all the Kochs' horses will be needed to try to put Citizens United back together again after the Senate voted resoundingly to bring an amendment overturning this highly contentious Supreme Court decision to the floor.  It is still an uphill battle for Democrats to defeat Citizens United, but they have some unlikely allies in the Tea Party, which is just as much pissed by how old guard Republicans use corporate backing to stay in office.  In fact, Americans overwhelmingly want campaign reform so that insurgents have a better shot of taking down long sitting incumbents, whether they be Republican or Democrat.

Still, the reach of corporate power is pervasive in our society and it will be difficult to get the 60 votes needed to overturn Citizens United in the Senate.  The USSC decision in 2010 opened the floodgates for corporate backed candidates in national and state elections.  Newt Gingrich kept his 2012 campaign alive almost entirely on the back of Sheldon Adelson, who donated $10 million to a Super PAC supporting Newt, allowing him to soundly thump Romney in South Carolina.  But, Romney had Super PAC money of his own, and eventually quashed Newt, as he did other GOP pretenders in the primaries, thanks to massive corporate support, leaving the embittered candidates sniping at him from behind.

In Wisconsin, the Kochs bankrolled Scott Walker's campaign through Super PAC's, allowing him to win the governor's seat in 2010 and survive a recall in 2012.  In turn, Walker did the Koch Bros. bidding by undermining collective bargaining in the state, which ostensibly serves as their home base.  Pretty amazing, when you consider that Wisconsin was once considered a Democratic union stronghold.  The same thing happened in Ohio.

The USSC decision seems to have favored Republicans moreso than Democrats, and for awhile the Tea Party seemed OK with it.  The aim in 2010 was to come up with a "majority" of 41 in the Senate to stifle any bills that might encroach upon corporate interests, so it was worth supporting insurgent campaigns like that of Scott Brown and Ted Cruz, Tea Party favorites.  But, as the TP grew increasingly volatile, and threatened to unhinge the GOP, that money dried up and the TP has struggled in Congressional races ever since.  

The Democratic Party is more or less stable, also benefiting from large corporate contributions that keep its power brokers in Congress.  But, it can win with or without this massive corporate support as witnessed by Obama's campaign in 2008, which appealed directly to the people.  Now, the Dems are struggling to hold onto their majority in the Senate, and one way to do that is to limit the corporate funding that keeps so many Republican campaigns afloat, as the GOP doesn't have this kind of mainstream support.

The Dems will need a half dozen Republican votes to carry the bill in the Senate.  They have to look carefully at the two dozen Republicans who crossed over in the procedural vote to move forward the bill and see if there are six or so who actually favor the bill and are willing to overturn Citizens United.  A win here doesn't assure a win in the House, where the Republican leadership can block the bill from ever coming to the floor, much as it did the immigration reform bill, which the Senate approved last year.

Sadly, American politics has become so muddled that it is difficult to stand up to these corporate power brokers, except in the streets or state legislative houses, as Wisconsin citizens did in 2011 when Walker introduced his anti-collective bargaining bill.  After surviving the recall election the following year, that energy evaporated.  However, the unrest is still there if only the Democrats can find a way to tap into it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

O Pioneers!

It is hard not to think of Nebraska without thinking of its greatest writer.  Here is a marvelous piece by Capote, Remembering Willa Cather . I remember seeing a stage production of O Pioneers! and being deeply moved by its raw emotions.  I had read My Antonia before, and soon found myself hooked, like Capote was by the simple elegance of her prose and the way she was able to evoke so many feelings through her characters.  Much of it came from the fact that she had lived those experiences herself. Her father dragged the family from Virginia to Nebraska in 1883, when it was still a young state, settling in the town of Red Cloud. named after one of the great Oglala chiefs.  Red Cloud was still alive at the time, living on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, in the aftermath of the "Great Sioux Wars" of 1876-77.  I don't know whether Cather took any interest in the famous chief, although it is hard to imagine not.  Upon his death in 1909, he was eulogi

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro

Colonel

Now with Colonel Roosevelt , the magnum opus is complete. And it deserves to stand as the definitive study of its restless, mutable, ever-boyish, erudite and tirelessly energetic subject. Mr. Morris has addressed the toughest and most frustrating part of Roosevelt’s life with the same care and precision that he brought to the two earlier installments. And if this story of a lifetime is his own life’s work, he has reason to be immensely proud.  -- Janet Maslin -- NY Times . Let the discussion begin!