We were warned back in 2016. Has it finally come to pass. A Princeton computer science professor showed how easy it was to hack a voting machine and urged Congress to secure voting. Less than two months later, Trump had won a surprise victory and there were deep concerns of Russian hacking. This led then Attorney General Jeff Sessions to launch an investigation, much to President Trump's chagrin. In Sessions' mind he was trying to assuage all the anxiety that surrounded an election in which Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million. The rest as they say is history. Or is it? What's interesting to me is that Trump had virtually no coattails, similar to 2016. Republicans would have won these contested races with or without him, as Democratic senators were doomed in West Virginia and Montana and had only an outside chance in Ohio. If there was any senator who benefited from Trump's "surprise" victory it is Dave McCormick. He was projected to lose to in
Like many, I didn't see that coming. I'm sure someone will make a sculpture of this image in the months to come. The CNN election news crew seemed disappointed when Kamala ran out of opportunities to make up the difference in Pennsylvania. John King kept showing all the large blue dots that indicated areas that still hadn't been fully counted, but one by one the dots shriveled up and she hardly made a dent in Trump's lead. All that was left was for Van Jones to deliver his eulogy in the early morning hours, just like he did in 2016. I guess greed and anger trump hope and joy. That's the message that has been heard around the world. One Guardian columnist offered a snarky if accurate take on Trump 2.0 . Yep, those who think they will gain favor in his administration are forgetting what happened to the last one. Objectively, we know what will occur given Trump's "dysfunctional relationship with power." Many thought we had learned our lesson from t