Skip to main content

Seeking Cellvation: HeLa Cells and Immortality


Interesting to find this cleverly titled essay by Hannah Landecker, published in 1996, which raises the many ethical concerns surrounding the death of Henrietta Lacks and the unbridled development of HeLa cells.  She was writing in response to a 1971 essay praising the work of George Gey, shown here.

Comments

  1. Thanks, Gintaras. This is an excellent analysis of the HeLa cell "phenomena" and helps uncover the underlying racist and sexist implications of the story, which in many ways Skloot seems oblivious to -- or at least unable to fully understand and reflect upon. Too bad Landecker didn't write the book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was so taken with this article that I just looked up what else she has written. Probably not any of our cups of tea, but here's the book that no doubt came from her dissertation:

    Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies, Harvard University Press, 2007

    Landecker now teaches at UCLA.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sounds like it could be an interesting book. Can't remember offhand whether Skloot references Landecker in her bibliography, but it seems that the essence of her book is contained in this essay, and from her preface Skloot took interest in the story in the late 90s.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Skloot has no bibliography, explaining that her sources were "too extensive to list in their entirety." She does refer to the Landauer book in her notes, as providing a review of the scientific activities involving HeLa cells. The notes indicate a deep and wide reading in the relevant science literature.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That is kind of odd not providing a bibliography for a "history" book. The more I read, the more concerned I become about her level of scholarship.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Isn't the bib. incorporated into the notes?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, the notes contain an overview of her sources. Not exactly "footnotes" but you can see the materials she has looked at there.

    I hate to jump in ahead of where you are, Gintaras, but the scholarship is definitely a mixed bag from my reading. Some of the "history of science" chapters are interesting and I'm assuming informative to both lay and more scientifically inclined readers -- like the mouse/human "hybrids" that Trippler mentioned.

    But she doesn't "see" the story in a bigger context the way Landecker does. And looking back through the book now, I still see it as too much about her as the glue to hold the parts together.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Very disjointed book. One gets the sense that this is more a work in progress and could have used more editing. It is only at about the halfway point where Skloot finally comes in contact with the family, presenting them in an all too stereotypical fashion. This may have been what it was, but it certainly could have used a little more literary polish.

    I think you are right, Carol, in that this book is more about Skloot's "awakening" than it is a serious study of the HeLa cell, or Henrietta Lacks herself. I suppose she was trying to tell this story in an oral tradition, but it just doesn't come together very well. Nevertheless, much of this information is new to me, so remain interested.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Landecker book, Culturing Life, looks very interesting, as she appears to get more into the biotech side of it, past and present, with reference to the HeLa cell.

    ReplyDelete
  10. If it is half as good as the article she wrote as a student, it would probably be worth reading at some point.

    Donna Haraway (whom Landecker references) is another historian I really like who looks deeply into the "meaning" of these things. Difficult to read, but fascinating.

    Her "Teddy Bear Patriarchy" is brilliant, about TR and the American Museum of Natural History. I just looked, but couldn't find a copy on line, but I bet there is one somewhere.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...