Skip to main content

Nation Building


Pauline Maier sizes up the Constitutional debates,


On Sept. 17, 1787, the convention that had been sitting in Philadelphia for four months to design a new form of government for the United States adjourned, offering its handiwork to the nation. Almost a year later, on Sept. 13, 1788, Congress declared that the Constitution had been duly ratified, and prescribed the rules for the first presidential election the following year. Pauline Maier’s delightful and engrossing book shows how America got from the first date to the second — and ultimately to today, since we still live with the same document, however modified.

One caveat: To like this book, you have to like politics. “Ratification” is an ur-text of the Almanac of American Politics. It has process, issues, arguments, local context, major players, minor players — and hoopla. “The popular excitement” that attended the struggle, Maier writes, “reminded me at times of Americans’ obsession with the final games of the World Series, but with greater intensity because everyone understood that the results would last far longer than a season. . . . Politics was in a real sense the first national game.” 

from a review by Richard Brookhiser in the NYTimes
........................

American Scripture looks good too.

Comments

  1. I think a book like this would be great for the next reading group. What do others think?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I ordered the book. Will take me about three weeks to receive it. So if everyone is game we can set a reading for February 15.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sounds like a good read. I just put in a request & hope to have by the end of the week.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just read the opening to Ratification. I'm in! I've always wanted to read a really good history of the Constitution. I'll try to stay ahead of the rest of you this time instead of lagging weeks behind.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just my copy but see once again that it has very small print. Good thing I have a bottle of Visine!

    Looks like a very interesting read.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yea, small print is getting to be too much for me as well.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Oh no! Are you saying, you're getting old (like me)?

    Ach, but it happens to all of us. How I wish we could find the Fountain of Youth!

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yep, finally had to accept reading glasses. Has taken me awhile to get used to them, but my wife tells me they make me look more intelligent. ; )

    ReplyDelete
  9. From what I've heard, the Kindle is the fountain of youth for us readers.... I just got an ipad. I need to figure out how to add a book reader to it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Speaking of Kindles....

    Robert is in for Ratification. I think he missed the last part of that Colonel conversation, but now knows how to find the turn at the end of the hall. If you don't follow the links via the recent comments it's easy to get lost in here.

    I'll be in DC for the first week of the discussion, but will take the book with me on the plane.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't need reading glasses when reading from the computer screen, but I think that is more a matter of distance from the screen.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I will also be reading via audio book Brian McGinty's "Lincoln & the Court'':

    http://www.amazon.com/Lincoln-Court-Brian-McGinty/dp/0674026551

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks avrds---and a special thanks to you, Gintaras for the gray tint on my screen which allows me to participate---my eye doctor says I'm comming along excellently and wants me to give my brain another six month to rewire my vision--after which, if called for' he will order me gray tinted lenses to use for reading--shaded, I'm told, with genuine Gintaras Gray, in honor of yourself. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  14. That's a high honor Robert. Anything to help keep you a participant in this forum. You are a most valued contributor and I have greatly enjoyed and learned from your depth of reading, understanding and comments over the years.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm up to p 70 in Maier ~ kinda slow reading (due to the small print with many words on a page) but it is a good topic.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm still trying to finish the Washington bio which is very good, but slow going for me.

    It's a lot like the TR bio -- too good not to keep reading. And it is a much fuller look at Washington's life than others I've read (one would hope at 900 pages!), and he is as good a writer as Morris without all the snarky asides.

    Trippler you would hate it, though -- very small print. I think this would be a good one to read on a Kindle. I wonder how Robert fared reading it.

    I leave town on the 15th so will take Ratification to DC with me.

    ReplyDelete
  17. My copy of Ratification came yesterday. Interesting start. Brought to mind Bernard Bailyn's book on the Ideological Origins of America and all the pamphleteering he described.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I'm up to about p 130 ~ are we going to use this thread or start a fresh one for the discussion?

    ReplyDelete
  19. I will open a new thread on Tuesday for discussion. Fascinating book thus far. Interesting reading Mason's and Randolph's concerns with the Constitution, many of which turned out to be true. And, for all this claptrap on the right that this is some kind of sacred document, when virtually all of those who signed it saw it as a work in progress, not a finished document.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro

Dylan in America

Whoever it was in 1969 who named the very first Bob Dylan bootleg album “Great White Wonder” may have had a mischievous streak. There are any number of ways you can interpret the title — most boringly, the cover was blank, like the Beatles’ “White Album” — but I like to see a sly allusion to “Moby-Dick.” In the seven years since the release of his first commercial record, Dylan had become the white whale of 20th-century popular song, a wild, unconquerable and often baffling force of musical nature who drove fans and critics Ahab-mad in their efforts to spear him, lash him to the hull and render him merely comprehensible. --- Bruce Handy, NYTimes ____________________________________________ I figured we can start fresh with Bob Dylan.  Couldn't resist this photo of him striking a Woody Guthrie pose.  Looks like only yesterday.  Here is a link to the comments building up to this reading group.

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which