Skip to main content



Anyone who has been to Paris has visited Notre-Dame.  The cathedral is one of the most iconic buildings in the world, an international treasure.   It will be rebuilt but the historic loss is incalculable.  The wood construction of the roof was original, dating back to the 12th century, as was much of the wood interior.  This can never be replaced.

Most everyone was left speechless, except CNN of course. Reporters tried to assess the damage as it was happening, stumbling over themselves in the process.  One needs time to process such a great loss. To sort through the ashes and see what can be saved.  To pay tribute to a great building that is now a hollow shell.  We realize in moments like this just how insignificant we are.  As much as we place value on human life, to lose so much of a building that has stood for over 800 years is to lose something even greater than human life.

I remember watching Sokurov's Francofonia a few years back and the question was put near the end of the movie, which is more valuable a great work of art or a human life?  The narrator paused for a moment and then begrudgingly conceded a human life.  I'm not quite so sure.  It's only been in the modern era that we placed value on human lives, although witnessing the human tragedies around the world, it seems not very much value.  A great work of art is a living testament that spans the ages.  To lose all or part of such a treasure is to lose a very tangible piece of who we are as a people.

We tend to think of the preservation movement as a relatively recent phenomena born out of the damage many European cities suffered during WWII.  One of the most visible reminders is the Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church in Berlin, which was purposely left in the same state as it was after the war.  However, the preservation movement goes back much further.  It was Viollet-le-Duc who restored Notre-Dame in the mid 19th century, giving it new life after centuries of neglect.

For others like John Ruskin, the cathedral should have been allowed to decay, as the castles had done in his native England.  Stabilize it if you have to, but no modern intrusions.  Viollet-le-Duc wasn't content with such a philosophy, bringing the cathedral back to more or less what it looked like when it was completed by King Louis XI.

The preservation movement has been torn by these rival philosophies ever since.  Here in Vilnius, there is a debate every year whether to reconstruct the old castle on top of the hill.  A few years back the federal government decided to reconstruct the old palace from the 16th century with mixed feelings among the historic architecture community.  Many felt it was enough just to expose the ruins and provide a visitor center where you could see what the old palace and castle looked like in the past.

Notre-Dame de Paris is a different story as it has been in almost continual use since it was first built, although there wasn't much interest expressed in the cathedral after the French Revolution.  That changed with Victor Hugo's The Hunchback of Notre-Dame.  This spurred calls for its restoration, and Viollet-le-Duc undertook the ambitious project in 1844, adding the iconic spire at this time.  He wasn't content to leave well enough alone.  Another major restoration effort took place in 1960s when much of the soot and grime was cleaned from the church, revealing its wonderful polichromy.

If anything positive can come from this horrible event, it is that the people of Paris can come back together again.  For months, the city has been besieged by yellow vests protests that has led to a lot of property damage.  This is why it was easy to suspect some culprit started the fire, but initial reports point to an accident.  President Macron has used the fire as a rally cry for unity and has promised to rebuild the cathedral.  We can all feel for Parisians this day.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

O Pioneers!

It is hard not to think of Nebraska without thinking of its greatest writer.  Here is a marvelous piece by Capote, Remembering Willa Cather . I remember seeing a stage production of O Pioneers! and being deeply moved by its raw emotions.  I had read My Antonia before, and soon found myself hooked, like Capote was by the simple elegance of her prose and the way she was able to evoke so many feelings through her characters.  Much of it came from the fact that she had lived those experiences herself. Her father dragged the family from Virginia to Nebraska in 1883, when it was still a young state, settling in the town of Red Cloud. named after one of the great Oglala chiefs.  Red Cloud was still alive at the time, living on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, in the aftermath of the "Great Sioux Wars" of 1876-77.  I don't know whether Cather took any interest in the famous chief, although it is hard to imagine not.  Upon his death in 1909, he was eulogi

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro

Colonel

Now with Colonel Roosevelt , the magnum opus is complete. And it deserves to stand as the definitive study of its restless, mutable, ever-boyish, erudite and tirelessly energetic subject. Mr. Morris has addressed the toughest and most frustrating part of Roosevelt’s life with the same care and precision that he brought to the two earlier installments. And if this story of a lifetime is his own life’s work, he has reason to be immensely proud.  -- Janet Maslin -- NY Times . Let the discussion begin!