Skip to main content

Past is Prologue



The Fall of Kabul is shaping up a lot like the Fall of Saigon, with US and NATO forces scrambling to evacuate their personnel from the capital city.  I suppose American forces didn't expect the Taliban to retake the country so quickly, but Afghan forces are putting up little resistance to the onslaught that sees Afghan cities taken on almost a daily basis.  This past week, three cities fell into Taliban control including Kandahar, with an assault on Kabul expected within the next 30 days.

I suppose this was inevitable as the US never had any real commitment to Afghanistan.  All those talks of a detente or loya jirga with the Taliban, never materialized into a lasting peace.  The Taliban simply bided their time, getting support from Pakistan and Russia, among other countries.  Just last year, it was reported that Russia was offering bounties on US soldiers' heads and now the Kremlin seeks to create ties with the Taliban in the wake of the massive pullout.  

An interesting irony here, as the Soviet Union was forced to evacuate Kabul under similar circumstances back in 1989, although then it was seen as a victory by the Mujihadeen.  This was one of the signal events that led to the collapse of the USSR.

Our involvement in Afghanistan was doomed from the start, as there was little way the US and its Allied Forces were going to convince the Taliban to cease and desist short of wide scale extermination.  But, how to do this without killing off half the population, as much if not most of the country appears to accept the Sharia view of the Taliban.  Only in Kabul, were the Allied Forces were able to create some sense of a modern country, extending a tenuous hold into outlying cities, but never really capturing the "hearts and mind" of the people.  As a result, the Taliban just waited until the Allied Forces gave up.

It was surprising that Biden would do so as quickly as he did, essentially carrying through on the withdrawal Trump had announced at the end of his administration.  The Afghan government was in no position to defend its country.  You can say they are largely to blame for this after 20 years of joint cooperation with NATO, but then one would think the US and NATO would opt for a more gradual pullout, rather than signaling to the Taliban they had given up, and essentially opening the door for this massive assault.

The big question is where has the Taliban gotten all their weapons.  Much of it is seized from Afghan forces, presumably in battle, but they are also being supplied covertly from outside the country.  Pakistan and Russia are the two prime suppliers.  These neighboring countries also supply logistics in the janus-faced game they play with NATO.  Whatever the case, the Taliban is well armed and has plotted a remorseless assault that has left many dead and wounded throughout the country.

The saddest part is that it didn't have to be this way.  We never had to go into Afghanistan in the first place.  The Taliban had said they were willing to turn over Osama bin Laden, but the Bush administration wanted more than just one head, they wanted to exact their revenge on a nation that had harbored bin Laden and al-Qaeda for several years.  Mostly, Dick and Rummy wanted a protracted war to justify the massive military-industrial complex they had helped forge over successive Republican administrations.  When Afghanistan didn't offer enough targets, they turned their attention to Iraq.

Our presence there was always tenuous.  The military had to create a green zone within Kabul to offer some measure of safety for the newly installed embassy and other international agencies that set themselves up in the capital after the fall of the Taliban.  This safe zone was under constant attack from suicide bombers, which became a sad litany of death counts on nightly news.  Attempts to reach out to other cities and townships was even more tenuous, with foreign workers needing bodyguards pretty much everywhere they went.  Yet, successive American governments kept reporting the successes they had made, especially among women who were once again seen as a vital part of society, at least in Kabul.

Past is prologue, as Antonio once said, and we should have learned from Vietnam, but we didn't.  Now we face every bit an ignominious end to our 20-year presence in Afghanistan as we did in Vietnam.  One can only hope that the US and Allied Forces are able to get all their personnel out of the country before the Taliban comes crashing through Kabul, otherwise it will get really ugly.  Biden will take the blame for any US citizens lost to the Taliban.  It doesn't matter who started the war, the shame will be all his.

It's too bad because there were glimmers of hope, but it now seems that by the end of the year the Taliban will once again claim Afghanistan as their own, forcing its people to live under feudal Islamic law with women relegated to chattel.  There will be little room for compromise.  We will simply shut off Afghanistan from the rest of the world as we did before, as if the last 20 years were a bittersweet dream.

Comments

  1. That was fast! I thought the US and Allied Forces would have 30 days to clear Kabul, now they're scrambling to get every out as soon as possible. What a sad, pathetic mess!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Searchers

You are invited to join us in a discussion of  The Searchers , a new book on John Ford's boldest Western, which cast John Wayne against type as the vengeful Ethan Edwards who spends eight years tracking down a notorious Comanche warrior, who had killed his cousins and abducted a 9 year old girl.  The film has had its fair share of detractors as well as fans over the years, but is consistently ranked in most critics'  Top Ten Greatest Films . Glenn Frankel examines the origins of the story as well as the film itself, breaking his book down into four parts.  The first two parts deal with Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, perhaps the most famous of the 19th century abduction stories.  The short third part focuses on the author of the novel, Alan Le May, and how he came to write The Searchers. The final part is about Pappy and the Duke and the making of the film. Frankel noted that Le May researched 60+ abduction stories, fusing them together into a nar...