Skip to main content

All about the bass


When I read Flea calling Macca the best rock bass player of all time I almost spit out my coffee.  He was sharing his thoughts on a podcast with Ted Danson and Woody Harrelson that was quickly picked up by social media.  The Red Hot Chili Peppers bassist isn't very articulate, resorting to "amazing" too many times, but he got the approval of Ted and Woody.  

Flea grew up in the 70s, just like I did, and there were plenty of great bass players.  Bootsy Collins is the first name to come to my mind.  He laid down the rhythms for Parliament, Funkadelic and his own Bootsy's Rubber Band.  Some more greats ones from that era were Geddy Lee of Rush, Geezer Butler of Black Sabbath, and Donald "Duck" Dunn who moonlighted with The Blues Brothers.  I would think these guys all had more influence on Flea growing up than did Sir Macca.  But, no, Flea places the Beatles' bassist at the top of his pantheon, singling out his work on Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.

All these accolades that Macca is receiving are getting tiresome. I understand that he is venerated for having been the biggest influence on pop music but was he really a great musician?  Certainly his fellow musicians at the time didn't think so.  Pete Townshend was particularly harsh on the Beatles but then you say Pete is harsh on everyone, even his own band.  Out of curiosity I searched for other naysayers and found quite a few, including Quincy Jones, who worked with Macca on that godawful "We Are the World" song.  He called Macca "the worst bass player of all time!"  This led to a highly publicized squabble in 2018.  Quincy felt bad afterward and apologized saying "bad mouthing is inexcusable," but he voiced what many have long felt of McCartney's heralded musicianship.

My biggest problem with the Beatles is calling them a rock band.  They were never a rock band.  If you need any evidence of this, listen to how easily their songs translate into Muzak with a very interesting twangy guitar that sounds more country than rock and roll.  Very few of their songs extended over three minutes at a time most rock bands were expanding their songs to fill out whole sides of long-play albums, venturing into guitar, bass and drum solos much like the jazz heros they idolized.  

The late 60s was a major turning point in rock music.  It went from what was essentially a corporate directed radio medium to an all out assault on the senses with "walls of sound," epitomized by The Grateful Dead, who would play for hours to stoned audiences often engaged in acid trips.  The Beatles tried to tie into this drug-induced culture when they rented Zsa Zsa Gabor's house in Laurel Canyon in the summer of 1965.  They hung out with Peter Fonda and The Byrds, among others.  Frank Zappa was a local resident at the time and was not impressed but no matter.  The Beatles soaked up the vibes and released Revolver the following year to rave reviews, but was it psychedelica?  Certainly not on the same wavelength as White Rabbit, which was released in 1967 on Surrealistic Pillow, perhaps the greatest psychedelic album of all time.  Grace Slick had this song kicking around in her head since 1965, making Alice's Adventures into Wonderland far more trippy.

As for bass, where is it?  It might be worth noting that Paul's original bass guitar was recently found after 51 years.  I can only imagine the price it will fetch at auction.  But, you listen to the Beatles' early songs and it is pretty hard to spot the bass.

Admittedly you can hear it on later songs, like Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart Club Band, which came out in 1967.  This is a more trippy album than Revolver but still not all that trippy.  Paul and John are singing louder over an imaginary crowd, as they no longer played live audiences, but at barely over two minutes it is nothing more than a tease.  The whole album is a tease, laden with tantalizing songs all of which end shortly after they get going.  They did break the three-minute mark on two songs on Side B, but otherwise these are songs that easily fit on 45's.

As Zappa said, "they were a good commercial group." Their entire discography was perfectly suited for mainstream radio and selling 45's with maybe a handful of exceptions.  Zappa singled out Paperback Writer, Strawberry Fields Forever and I Am the Walrus.  The rest meh.

You often see George and Ringo at the top of greatest guitarist and drummer lists, but Paul has been getting an inordinate amount of attention recently.  He even climbed into the Top Ten on Rolling Stone's list of 50 Greatest Bassists.  That's pretty amazing considering he edges out Ron Carter, the greatest living jazz bassist.  I'd be very curious what Quincy thinks of this.

Of course, these lists don't mean much but Paul's been getting a lot of praise from his peers as well.  Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead also put Paul at the top along with John Entwistle.  Lemmy liked Abba too, so go figure.  All this comes out post mortem (Lemmy died in 2015) in Far Out magazine articles that pop up on my facebook timeline.

Even Pete Townshend seems repentant these days, saying he "wasn't crazy impressed with the Beatles, but I loved them."  For years he loved to bash them and often accused Paul and John of stealing his songs.

So, what gives?  Where is all this newfound love coming from?  Were the Beatles really that good or do we simply acknowledge them because there is no way to shake their music from our heads?  It is virtually impossible to escape the Beatles these days despite it being more than 50 years since their infamous break up.

However, anyone who says Paul is the greatest rock bassist of all time is overlooking a hell of a lot of great bassists who have made a far bigger impact on the genre.  You don't listen to the Beatles and say, "Oh, Paul is such a great bassist!"  In fact you have a pretty hard time even hearing the bass on many of their songs.  It's nothing like the bass-heavy funk songs of the 70s or the punk scene that emerged in the same era, which I would think Flea beholden to.  But, whatever, Sir Macca is now 82 so lets shower even more false praise on him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro

Dylan in America

Whoever it was in 1969 who named the very first Bob Dylan bootleg album “Great White Wonder” may have had a mischievous streak. There are any number of ways you can interpret the title — most boringly, the cover was blank, like the Beatles’ “White Album” — but I like to see a sly allusion to “Moby-Dick.” In the seven years since the release of his first commercial record, Dylan had become the white whale of 20th-century popular song, a wild, unconquerable and often baffling force of musical nature who drove fans and critics Ahab-mad in their efforts to spear him, lash him to the hull and render him merely comprehensible. --- Bruce Handy, NYTimes ____________________________________________ I figured we can start fresh with Bob Dylan.  Couldn't resist this photo of him striking a Woody Guthrie pose.  Looks like only yesterday.  Here is a link to the comments building up to this reading group.

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which