Skip to main content

Oh, the hypocrisy of it all



After repeated denials, Paul Ryan has admitted he requested stimulus cash even after sharply criticizing the program.

As recently as Wednesday in Ohio, Mitt Romney's running mate told ABC's Cincinnati affiliate, WCPO, he did not.
"I never asked for stimulus," Ryan said. "I don't recall… so I really can't comment on it. I opposed the stimulus because it doesn't work, it didn't work."

Comments

  1. I'm beginning to wonder if he will even last to the convention.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rachel Maddow had a series of photos of Republicans who had voted against the stimulus with the BIG CHECKS they were photographed with back at home. Total hypocrites.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There ought to better word we could use instead of hypocrites. Oh, wait. I've got it: Lyin' sacks of you know what.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, you know, if it's there, why not take it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think Ryan may go down as a pick worse than Palin. At least Palin had a kind of sex appeal in an Alaskan beer queen sort of way.

    ReplyDelete
  6. His only other option was to go with Pawlenty, which would have resulted in a ticket of bland and blander. Medicare and other draconian cuts seem to be a debate Romney thinks he can win.

    I do feel for Pawlenty though -- he cut off his mullet and got passed over twice for the job anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  7. And as for Christie:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/08/17/as-keynote-looms-christies-jersey-comeback-suffers-setback

    ReplyDelete
  8. Indeed. We have had a great governor for the last eight years, but he fell for that idea too. Thank goodness he didn't turn us into another Iceland/Ireland. He sure wanted to before the crash.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is where it gets scary. If you are over 55, you got yours so you can vote for Romney and Ryan and not worry about the rest of America's access to insurance and healthcare:

    http://nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/paul-ryan-makes-an-emotional-pitch-for-medicare-plan-in-florida-20120818

    ReplyDelete
  10. Except that their "Medicare plan" only favors those with Medicare Advantage, roughly 25% of those who receive Medicare, so it is not very advantageous to their campaign, other than their outrageous claim that Obama would strip Medicare of over $700 bil, which they assume will sufficiently scare the other 75%.

    In actual fact the ACA would extend Medicare's solvency another 8 years to 2024. Romneycare would strip away the savings, pretty much insuring its demise, especially if they were able to get their silly voucher plan through Congress.

    ReplyDelete
  11. And as I understand the cuts, they come from providers and go to increase access to health care generally. Again, this is that "I've got mine" attitude that Ryan and Romney seem to be running on. Don't worry about those under 55. They'll be fine.

    Doesn't the convention start this week? Should be an interesting one.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I don't think the convention will be very interesting unless there is some controversy over the platform. The Tea Party and Ron Paul supporters may make some waves. Pretty much handpicked speakers, for the most boring beyond belief, who will spill out the same bile we have heard on the campaign trail.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Maybe they will open up a speaking slot for Tod Akin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yea, they can have a night of discussing what "legitimate rape" is.

      Delete
    2. That is an amazing story -- and what is even more disheartening is that people in Missouri will still vote for the guy.

      Delete
  14. I am off a week -- for some reason I was thinking this was the last week of the month. We have one more week to anticipate all the fun.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I just don't want the Republicans framing the debate on Medicare. The Dems need to fire back hard and heavy in the weeks ahead and reveal Ryan as the con man that he is,

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/20/opinion/krugman-an-unserious-man.html?_r=1&smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&seid=auto

    ReplyDelete
  16. This is how to answer delusional right wing health care critics:

    http://www.upworthy.com/a-tea-partier-decided-to-pick-a-fight-with-a-foreign-president-it-didnt-go-so-we?g=4

    ReplyDelete
  17. Whoa! That's quite the retort. Sometimes it takes someone on the outside looking in to see what's really going on.

    ReplyDelete
  18. That along with the way Tony Benn and George Galloway answer the right wing geniuses who are screwing this country and the world. Too bad liberals nationwide won't do the same.

    ------

    By the way, has everyone gotten their copy of JM Barry? It is an excellent book, well worth reading.

    ReplyDelete
  19. You either have to be getting ready for Halloween or be a complete idiot to want something like this,

    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/paul-ryan-masks-hot-item-gop-convention-002142590.html

    ReplyDelete
  20. That I did see earlier ... Chuck Todd had one and sort of put it on from the floor earlier.

    The eyes pop out which I think says something -- not sure what, though.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This is definitely becoming the campaign that couldn't shoot straight,

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/paul-ryan-trips-over-marathon-question/

    ReplyDelete
  22. Ryan strikes me as someone who is fast enough on his feet that he can convince most everyone around him that he knows what he is talking about. But on the national stage, people are going to start fact checking him -- it may be his undoing. Plus, generally, and I don't mean this as mere snark -- I think they both have a hard time telling the truth.

    I loved that Sarah Palin would have beat him in a race -- and that John Edwards would have beat them both. But then that boy has been running away all his life (sadly I still like Edwards).

    ReplyDelete
  23. Little Paul playing the marijuana card,

    http://news.yahoo.com/ryan-dont-interfere-legalized-medical-pot-025634169--election.html

    if we are going to blabber about state's rights, then let's not hear anymore about the defense of marriage act.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Searchers

You are invited to join us in a discussion of  The Searchers , a new book on John Ford's boldest Western, which cast John Wayne against type as the vengeful Ethan Edwards who spends eight years tracking down a notorious Comanche warrior, who had killed his cousins and abducted a 9 year old girl.  The film has had its fair share of detractors as well as fans over the years, but is consistently ranked in most critics'  Top Ten Greatest Films . Glenn Frankel examines the origins of the story as well as the film itself, breaking his book down into four parts.  The first two parts deal with Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, perhaps the most famous of the 19th century abduction stories.  The short third part focuses on the author of the novel, Alan Le May, and how he came to write The Searchers. The final part is about Pappy and the Duke and the making of the film. Frankel noted that Le May researched 60+ abduction stories, fusing them together into a nar...