Skip to main content

Find the Cost of Freedom

By


It doesn't seem like we need Veterans Day anymore as everyday has become Veterans Day judging by how often Americans pay deference to soldiers having fought in this protracted War on Terror.  Hardly a day goes by where someone isn't paying tribute to military personnel on facebook.  Memes abound, as we are continuously reminded of their brave service, particularly elite forces, which have increasingly become the subject of books and movies and even reality shows.  I don't knock these fearless warriors, but I have to wonder about the extent of this idol worship.

They certainly aren't protecting my freedom, as is so often noted.  What goes on in the Middle East pretty much stays in the Middle East, despite all the dire warnings.  These Islamicists are doing no more than what religious conservatives would like to do in the United States -- create a theocracy.  As far as I'm concerned it is up to Iraqis and Afghanis to fight their own wars.  We would be far better off not getting in the middle of these conflicts, yet we have been aiding and abetting one side or the other for more than 60 years now.


It seems what we are protecting is a vast military industrial complex.  Literally, a trillion dollars is spent each year on the defense industry.  The F-35 fighter jet has cost $1.5 trillion alone.  The contract to build this "state of the art" jet was signed 18 years ago, and only now have the first prototypes been tested.  It is already obsolete as the Chinese have had plenty of time to develop their alternative version, the J-31, which was shown off at an air show during the APEC meeting President Obama is attending.  It came in at a fraction of the cost of the F-35.  Republicans decry what they consider profligate spending on domestic programs, but don't bat an eye at the cost overruns on this colossal failure, which they pushed through Congress during Clinton's administration, claiming we needed to upgrade our Air Force.

Maybe Congress should be thinking more about the veterans they want us to extol, many of whom find themselves living below the poverty line.  Even enlisted soldiers increasingly have to rely on food stamps to make ends meet.  Yet, Congress continues to appropriate money for the military's latest gadgets while many returning soldiers struggle to find the treatment and health care they need back home.

George Bush makes a big show of entertaining wounded warriors at his Crawford Ranch in Texas each year.  We are supposed to think of Dubya as a great guy because he does so much work with these veterans now that he too is retired.  If he had such a "profound respect" for these men and women he never would have engaged us in Iraq and Afghanistan in the first place!

Alas, we are supposed to ignore such things on Veterans Day and pay our respects to those who have served this great country in battle.  If we really had that much concern we would do more to end war, not continue to perpetuate it in the defense of our military industry.

Any little uprising is a call to arms these days, as witnessed in the Sunni rebellion.  The venerable John McCain, who seemed to suffer inoperable brain damage during his time in a Vietnam POW camp, will mostly likely be serving as head of the Senate foreign relations committee next January, no doubt pressuring Obama even more to send troops to quell this uprising.  As it is, Obama has already committed 1500 troops to be redeployed in Iraq.  It's like Catch-22.

Americans seem to live vicariously through our soldiers, oblivious to the hardships, the traumatization, and neverending medical costs these veterans incur after two, three, or more tours in the Middle East.  We don't seem to question the political motivations like we did in the 70s when Vietnam lingered on for 10 years.  We just accept it as part of "the cost of freedom."

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
228 comments
Read more

Dylan in America

By
Whoever it was in 1969 who named the very first Bob Dylan bootleg album “Great White Wonder” may have had a mischievous streak. There are any number of ways you can interpret the title — most boringly, the cover was blank, like the Beatles’ “White Album” — but I like to see a sly allusion to “Moby-Dick.” In the seven years since the release of his first commercial record, Dylan had become the white whale of 20th-century popular song, a wild, unconquerable and often baffling force of musical nature who drove fans and critics Ahab-mad in their efforts to spear him, lash him to the hull and render him merely comprehensible. --- Bruce Handy, NYTimes ____________________________________________ I figured we can start fresh with Bob Dylan.  Couldn't resist this photo of him striking a Woody Guthrie pose.  Looks like only yesterday.  Here is a link to the comments building up to this reading group.
182 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more