Skip to main content

The Republicans' New Century

By



You have to hand it to the GOP for thinking big, but a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee said Rep. Greg Walden (R-Oregon) meant the biggest House majority in the last century, since 1964 anyway.  Well, I think Walden meant what he said, because the Republicans have no intention of giving up the House anytime soon, and the way state voting districts are currently gerrymandered that may indeed be a long time.

Chuck Todd thinks the current GOP majority is good for another eight years, at least until 2022.  Of course, a lot could happen between now and then.  The Republicans felt very smug following their 1994 electoral mandate, which gave them the majority in the House for the first time since the Truman era, 1954.  But, their fumbling of the economy led to a Democratic victory in the 2006 midterms.  Unfortunately, this victory was very short-lived, as the Republicans regained the House in 2010, largely thanks to the electorate's bad memory.

Since then, Republican legislatures in key states have gone out of their way to gerrymander voting districts to ensure a perpetual Republican majority even in traditional Democratic states like Wisconsin.  The way districts are now aligned in many states, Democrats can outvote Republicans statewide, but not overturn state legislatures or Congressional House representation in their state, as was the case in North Carolina in 2012.

Sadly, these days Democrats can't even win statewide gubernatorial and Senate races because of their inability to get out the vote.  Defeatism has once again crept into the party and that will be pretty hard to overcome if you feel the deck is stacked against you in so many states.

However, 100 years is a very long time.  The longest stretch any party has held onto the House is 1955-1995, a Democratic reign which saw sweeping legislative changes including the Civil Rights Act.  It was a majority that withstood five Republican presidents, but ground to a halt in 1994, largely under its own weight, and what many critics felt to be major missteps by the Clinton administration.

The Republicans have controlled the House 16 of the last 20 years, which in itself is an impressive feat, especially when you consider how badly they have managed the House these last four years.  There is so much strife within the party.  That unified feeling coming out of this year's midterms may be very short lived, as you have the neocons and religious conservatives fighting for the "soul" of the GOP.

But, one can forgive Rep. Walden for his hyperbole.  It is only natural to boast in the wake of such a sweeping victory, even if only 36 percent of Americans turned out to vote.  Oregon voters at least showed up at the polls with a turnout of 52 percent, but his state has been reliably "Blue" for decades and recently passed a referendum to make marijuana legal,which probably was the most impelling reason to vote.

Unfortunately, Walden, like so many Republicans, finds himself on the wrong side of many issues, which doesn't bode well for the GOP in the future.  But, Republicans hope that Democrats will be too dispirited to reclaim the House anytime soon.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
228 comments
Read more

Dylan in America

By
Whoever it was in 1969 who named the very first Bob Dylan bootleg album “Great White Wonder” may have had a mischievous streak. There are any number of ways you can interpret the title — most boringly, the cover was blank, like the Beatles’ “White Album” — but I like to see a sly allusion to “Moby-Dick.” In the seven years since the release of his first commercial record, Dylan had become the white whale of 20th-century popular song, a wild, unconquerable and often baffling force of musical nature who drove fans and critics Ahab-mad in their efforts to spear him, lash him to the hull and render him merely comprehensible. --- Bruce Handy, NYTimes ____________________________________________ I figured we can start fresh with Bob Dylan.  Couldn't resist this photo of him striking a Woody Guthrie pose.  Looks like only yesterday.  Here is a link to the comments building up to this reading group.
182 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more