Skip to main content

The Bundys' Last Stand

or The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight




Ammon Bundy, eldest son of Cliven Bundy, the ranching freeloader who refused to pay 21 years in back grazing fees, fines and penalties, has seized an Oregon Fish and Wildlife Service office in the name of the Hammond family, which he claims was unfairly prosecuted by the federal government for range fires they set.  The only problem is that the Hammond family wants nothing to do with the Bundys, even if they feel the father and son were unfairly sentenced as terrorists for two fires they claimed were meant to protect their property.  You can read the whole story here.

This has set the blogosphere ablaze with many calling for the forcible removal of the Bundy gang, but federal authorities don't want another incident like the one that took place in the spring of last year.  That one blew up all out of proportion with Sean Hannity and Fox News taking the side of the Bundy family, turning it into a three-ring political circus with just about every politician chiming in one way or the other.



Even though it turned out Cliven Bundy was not only guilty in his actions but an unrepentant racist as well, Rand Paul actively sought his support for his campaign.  It had to be one of the oddest pairings you would ever see, as Paul was considered to be one of the more sane Republicans running for the Oval Office.  Bundy is a guy not even Glenn Beck would touch with a ten-foot pole.  But, it seems a desperate Rand Paul was looking for anyone who loosely fit the "Libertarian" mold to gain him access to the gun nuts in the GOP.

Here we are again with the Bundys trying to command national attention where it is not wanted.  The Oregon ranching community wants nothing to do with the Bundys.  The Hammonds will appeal the five-year sentences in the court of law.

One can certainly argue that the Hammonds got harsher sentences than they deserved.  Even the US district judge who oversaw the case thought the five-year mandatory sentence was too much and reduced it to 3 months and one year for the father and son respectively, but the federal appeals court imposed the mandatory minimum, as the law is the law.

Not even the Oathkeepers want anything to do with the Bundys, respecting the rights of the Hammond family to keep out of their affair.  Ammon and his younger brother Ryan Bundy have simply gone rogue, hoping Fox comes calling again I guess.


Unfortunately for the Bundys, the Republican Presidential candidates are keeping mum, including Rand Paul, who got very little traction from Cliven Bundy's endorsement.  What attracted the GOP candidates to the Bundys initially is that they are all in favor of selling off federal land to state and local interests, as there is a growing sentiment in the conservative ranks that the Feds simply own too much property that could be put to better use.  However, you have to ask yourself if state and local interests would charge the same ridiculously low grazing, logging and mining rates which the federal government does.

Ranchers have access to an estimated 245 million acres of federal land, which are leased at very favorable rates by the Bureau of Land Management.  There are however rules and conditions that come with it, which most ranchers honor, but a few like the Bundys do not.  This new standoff has nothing to do with the Hammonds case.  It was simply a convenient pretext for Ammon and Ryan to rear their ugly heads again and turn this into a land issue.

I can understand the government's reticence to use force to remove the Bundys, as they don't want to call anymore attention to this publicity stunt than it has already gotten.

Comments

  1. I probably should change the sub-header to "My Kingdom for a Bag of Cheetos,"

    https://scontent-frt3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/1918294_1038297896263264_7662631407229845529_n.jpg?oh=572c489e8b848059c4f87da535558804&oe=570B6EDA

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Searchers

You are invited to join us in a discussion of  The Searchers , a new book on John Ford's boldest Western, which cast John Wayne against type as the vengeful Ethan Edwards who spends eight years tracking down a notorious Comanche warrior, who had killed his cousins and abducted a 9 year old girl.  The film has had its fair share of detractors as well as fans over the years, but is consistently ranked in most critics'  Top Ten Greatest Films . Glenn Frankel examines the origins of the story as well as the film itself, breaking his book down into four parts.  The first two parts deal with Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, perhaps the most famous of the 19th century abduction stories.  The short third part focuses on the author of the novel, Alan Le May, and how he came to write The Searchers. The final part is about Pappy and the Duke and the making of the film. Frankel noted that Le May researched 60+ abduction stories, fusing them together into a nar...