Skip to main content

Bogus Quotes

One of the things I've noticed on Facebook the past two years is the great number of bogus quotes attributed to the Founding Fathers and other historical figures.  This is one currently making the rounds,


Like Washington would have encouraged insurrection while he presided as President.  This is a blatant distortion, as noted by guncite, of a speech Washington gave before Congress in 1790.  The actual quote is,

A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well digested plan is requisite: And their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories, as tend to render them independent on others, for essential, particularly for military supplies.

Washington, like many other Americans, was worried the fledgling United States was in a poor military position in regard to its hostile neighbors, Britain, France and Spain, and was encouraging the manufacture of more weapons to arm state militias and the marginal US Army.  Yet, these bogus quotes are being used in defense of gun rights.

Comments

  1. I like even more those purported quotes which say the Founders intended this to be a Christian nation. That's a joke of the worse kind.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The sad part is that blockheads accept these "quotes" at face value, which means they have read little if any history. The guy who invented the quote doesn't even capture Washington's tone of voice.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jefferson"quotes" seem to be a favorite of these folks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You sound like a typical anti-gun Liberal using any opportunity to interpret the 2nd amendment to your benefit. What makes you an expert about what Washington and others were concerned about? Show me your expertise on what the mindset was behind any of their opinions. The actual text of What Washington said and the "bogus" quote are essentially the same thing. One is put into more modernized language for the average person to understand. No mater how you spin it, you can not deny that the Constitution gives us the right to keep and bear arms. The first line of his quote "A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined" Spin it how you want. You know what the founding fathers intended.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It isn't the first part of the "quote" that is problematic, it's that last bit about "which would include their own government." That is putting words into Washington's mouth. We are all free to believe what we think Washington meant, but that is different from quoting him. A quote is not an interpretation. Washington either said or wrote the words attributed to him or he didn't.

      Delete
  5. What? A quote is what someone says, in his or her own words. That's why they are put in quotation marks. Otherwise it's not a quote.

    Washington either said something or he didn't. You can't just make up quotes or edit them because they sound more modern.

    As they say, you are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own quotes ....

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, Whitehorse, your comment sounds like the typical knee-jerk reaction by a gun owner who doesn't bother to read much history. Washington would have never supported insurrection against his own government. He never said it or thought it. But, thanks for dropping by.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Searchers

You are invited to join us in a discussion of  The Searchers , a new book on John Ford's boldest Western, which cast John Wayne against type as the vengeful Ethan Edwards who spends eight years tracking down a notorious Comanche warrior, who had killed his cousins and abducted a 9 year old girl.  The film has had its fair share of detractors as well as fans over the years, but is consistently ranked in most critics'  Top Ten Greatest Films . Glenn Frankel examines the origins of the story as well as the film itself, breaking his book down into four parts.  The first two parts deal with Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, perhaps the most famous of the 19th century abduction stories.  The short third part focuses on the author of the novel, Alan Le May, and how he came to write The Searchers. The final part is about Pappy and the Duke and the making of the film. Frankel noted that Le May researched 60+ abduction stories, fusing them together into a nar...