Skip to main content

John Coltrane Live in Seattle




There are moments when the world seems to turn in a new direction, and that was the case in 1965 when jazz music appeared headed in an all new direction.  John Coltrane wasn't the first musican to explore free jazz (Ornette Coleman had already made it into an art form), but his bold steps in this direction that year turned the jazz world on its ear.

I suppose that was because listeners had become comfortable with his lush ballads like those on My Favorite Things. However,  A Love Supreme, recorded in late 1964, signaled he was ready to move on.  Widely regarded as his best album, it evoked a deeper, more meditative chord than any of his previous works, opening the door to a greater range of sounds and expressions as if he had unlocked some hidden gate with the chant that appears throughout the four parts of this singular work.

But, critics were taken aback when he went completely atonal in 1965.  It was under such a cloud of controversy that Coltrane came to Seattle in October of that year for a concert at a small club in Pioneer Square.  In addition to his well-known rhythm section, Pharoah Sanders joined him on tenor sax  and Donald Garrett added an additional double bass.

Jan Kurtis didn't know what to expect so he brought everything he had in the way of recording equipment to the show that night.  The result is a live recording that stands out as one of Coltrane's best -- Live in Seattle.  There's some unwanted background noise in parts, but that is hard to avoid.  Coltrane was apparently so impressed with what he heard the next day that he asked Kurtis to record an album in his Camelot Studio -- Om.  The MP3 recordings don't do the music justice, but at least they give you a feel.

It is easy to split Trane at this stage of his career.  There were those who preferred to hold onto the old melodic Coltrane, and there were those who chose to embrace the brash new Coltrane.  But, it wasn't like it was a great leap.  The process had evolved from the late 50s with his first exploration into Hindu and Muslim music on Giant Steps.  It was one of the reasons he left Miles Davis.  You can still sense the Blues rhythms in his later works, but they have been bent and reshaped by his greater awareness of music as a whole.

Hard to think of this music as history, especially as it sounds much more contemporary than much of what we hear today, but this was nearly 50 years ago.




Comments

  1. I was there. I remember the ambience, the equipment, the musicians. I nursed a bourbon and tried to make sense if what was passing into my brain. Two basses, Pharaoh screeching and roaring. A wall of unintelligible sound and force. I left puzzled and strangely upset. I am still mystified after49 years.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I certainly wish I had been there, but I would have been in my diapers ; )

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro

Dylan in America

Whoever it was in 1969 who named the very first Bob Dylan bootleg album “Great White Wonder” may have had a mischievous streak. There are any number of ways you can interpret the title — most boringly, the cover was blank, like the Beatles’ “White Album” — but I like to see a sly allusion to “Moby-Dick.” In the seven years since the release of his first commercial record, Dylan had become the white whale of 20th-century popular song, a wild, unconquerable and often baffling force of musical nature who drove fans and critics Ahab-mad in their efforts to spear him, lash him to the hull and render him merely comprehensible. --- Bruce Handy, NYTimes ____________________________________________ I figured we can start fresh with Bob Dylan.  Couldn't resist this photo of him striking a Woody Guthrie pose.  Looks like only yesterday.  Here is a link to the comments building up to this reading group.

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which