Skip to main content

Rebirth of a Nation

By
You had mentioned this title, avrds. It covers the turbulent period between 1877 and 1920, seemingly from an industrial angle, although Lears appears to cover quite a bit of territory in the process:

Lears is at his inspired best when he discusses the anti-imperialist intellectuals such as Mark Twain, Jane Addams and William James, who rejected the fantasy of civilizing the Filipinos, as Twain put it, by way of "Maxim Guns and Hymn Books." Equally intriguing is Lears's treatment of the young cultural critic Randolph Bourne. During World War I, as most progressive intellectuals were seduced by the notion of regeneration by way of the bloodbath on the Western Front, Bourne remained "a champion of ambiguity." He stuck to his belief that the war would only produce state repression and inhumanity, famously observing: "War is the health of the state." "Rebirth of a Nation" is dazzling cultural history: smart, provocative and gripping. It is also a book for our times, historically grounded, hopeful and filled with humane, just and peaceful possibilities.

Comments

  1. avrdsJuly 8, 2009 at 3:03 PM

    I have this one coming. Would others be interested in reading this one next? Would certainly set the stage for TR.

    ReplyDelete
  2. avrdsJuly 8, 2009 at 3:03 PM

    Here are a couple other odd balls I recently picked up:

    http://www.amazon.com/American-Lightning-Mystery-Hollywood-Century/dp/0307346943

    and this

    http://www.amazon.com/Day-Wall-Street-Exploded-America/dp/019514824X

    ReplyDelete
  3. avrdsJuly 10, 2009 at 4:22 PM

    This book arrived yesterday, and think I'll start on it today until the group settles on another one. Hopefully it will be a good one.

    ReplyDelete
  4. James FergusonJuly 10, 2009 at 6:25 PM

    Look forward to your comments. I've read a couple books from that era including Brands' The Reckless Decade: America in the 1890s. It was a time of much speculation and as Blight noted in Race and Reunion the economic collapse of 1873 had a lot to do with the gutting of Reconstruction, as there was no longer the money to fund these efforts. But, the late 1890s was also the ferment for the Progressivism that took hold in the 20th century.

    ReplyDelete
  5. avrdsJuly 13, 2009 at 6:36 PM

    My comments may be few and far between, Gintaras, since this book appears to be a bit of a slog (glad we didn't choose this one).

    But it is an interesting book generally to pick up after Goodwin since he is looking at the period after the Civil War, and the reunion of what he refers to as the white north and the white south -- thus the rebirth.

    Also he notes that after suffering through such a devastating war, Americans were looking for ways that war could reflect a higher calling.

    He has presented some interesting ideas in the opening -- it may take me awhile to get to them all, however. (Just in case, I'm also bringing Lion in the White House about Roosevelt on the airplane).

    ReplyDelete
  6. James FergusonJuly 14, 2009 at 12:33 PM

    Interesting to me in reading some of the reviews of books that pick up the Post-Reconstruction theme is that many chart the Progressive Movement's origins to Reconstruction times. I always thought it came later with the rise of William Jennings Bryan, but then it makes sense that Reconstruction served as a hotbed of radical and socialist thinking in regard to providing a greatere extent of social services to American citizens, although I would say that Progressivism came into being with the next generation.

    ReplyDelete
  7. avrdsJuly 15, 2009 at 12:20 AM

    That's exactly where this book is headed, I think.

    And I take back my negative first impression. Once I got past the introduction where he sets out his thesis, it's really interesting. And it picks up with reconstruction, so it's like a more academic follow-up to Goodwin.

    I'll try to post more from it as I have time.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more