Skip to main content

The War on Social Security

By

Marco Rubio's recent comments make it abundantly clear the right wing hasn't given up its war on Social Security.  You can view more political cartoons in the same vein as the one above.   Once again, we hear all the horror stories, claiming that early retirement will run out by 2017 and that Social Security itself could be insolvent by 2035, assuming we don't dig ourselves out of this economic hole.  It was the same type of rhetoric that was used during the early Reagan years, as he badly wanted to tap into entitlement programs.

As it is, we have seen an erosion in entitlement programs over the last 10 years with Congress running up record deficits while trying to maintain historic low taxes.  The tax base, as a percentage of GDP, is the lowest it has been since 1942.  Yet, every Republican presidential candidate is calling for even lower taxes, while Rick Perry wants to abolish the federal income tax all together, with the repeal of the 16th amendment.  Where will that leave entitlement programs?

There seems to be this widespread feeling among a restless young generation that senior citizens are riding on their backs, and that only by freeing up Social Security and Medicare in the form of vouchers, can they be free to choose what they want to do with "their" money.  Bush first broached the idea of Social Security vouchers in 2003, and retracted his statement pretty quickly when he saw the angry reaction.  Nevertheless, Paul Ryan suggested the same thing for Medicare in the budget plan he proposed earlier this year.  Rubio seems to represent this disgruntled generation.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Rick DiguetteAugust 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM

    In a way I can't blame young people for rejecting the premise underlying Social Security--that one generation "repays" with its SS contributions the generation that came before it. Look at the mess that's been made of our economy by the "grownups" in the room. It's more and more difficult to pay for an education, find a job, or own a home. That is the legacy of the last three to four decades. On the other hand, if our youth think they will be better stewards of "their" money, they've been spending too much time listening to the guys and gals on Wall Street who want one thing and one thing only: "their" money.

    ReplyDelete
  2. MartiAugust 27, 2011 at 8:36 PM

    Aww, just tried to post something about it's the old politicians (like Rick Perry) who are so against "entitlements," and not so much the young people themselves. (Google made me log into account and then gave me a page that told me to put my cell phone number in and then I was off this page).

    The minority of young people who want to manage their own SS (hey, they have 401(k) and IRAs for this!): they think they'll never be old and that one day they will be wealthy enough not to need SS and Medicare. Foolishness.

    ReplyDelete
  3. avrdsAugust 27, 2011 at 9:51 PM

    This is an interesting article. I think they should eliminate the cap altogether, which would take care of all of this, but Sanders has a different idea:

    http://www.nationofchange.org/sen-sanders-plan-actually-fix-social-security-1314458965

    Hope you are safe Marti!

    ReplyDelete
  4. avrdsAugust 27, 2011 at 10:05 PM

    Just signed up for my free Obama 2012 bumper sticker. I don't have the passion to work day and night on his campaign that I once had (although that may change as the republican opposition grows), but I still support the President.

    You can get one here:

    http://my.barackobama.com/bumper-sticker-inv

    ReplyDelete
  5. SEO ExpertDecember 13, 2018 at 2:34 PM

    I am continually amazed by the amount of information available on this subject. What you presented was well researched and well worded in order to get your stand on this across to all your readers. eliaandponto.com/michigan-social-security-disability/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more