Skip to main content

He did it his way




I remember listening to Mario Cuomo's keynote speech at the Democratic Convention in 1984 and wishing he was running for President and not Walter Mondale.  I was sure he would run in 1988 and again in 1992, but Cuomo ducked out both times.  My father felt he had too many skeletons in his closet, but it seems that Cuomo preferred Albany to Washington.

His tenure finally ran out in 1994 when he was upset by George Pataki in what proved to be a watershed year for Republicans.  George Bush similarly scored a surprise victory in Texas over the well-liked Ann Richards.  They both had a great sense of humor about it, but I have to think that loss hurt.  His once formidable political clout was gone and he was relegated to a periphery figure in American politics.

It was his good fortune to father a son who would restore his dynasty in New York, but it isn't the same. Andrew is not the great speechmaker his father was and he struggles to place himself at the center of national politics, which Mario was.

Mario Cuomo was that rare political animal, one who had an inner being.  He took time to read, to digest information and form intelligent opinions, not just play off emotions the way most politicians do.  It is hard to say whether he would have made a good president but the way he was able to balance rival political interests in New York should serve as a model for any executive.

It is hard to think of him as a liberal, as he adopted many Republican concerns like spending cuts and a balanced budget.  I remember a Village Voice article commenting on whether he was a "Closet Republican."  Somehow, he managed to keep just enough social programs intact to make liberals relatively content while convincing moderates he was fiscally responsible.  Call it "progressive pragmatism" if you like but it was a  recipe that earned him three terms as governor.

One can't really say he will be missed, as his political career ended 20 years ago and he kept a relatively low profile since then.  He returned to law and authored a handful of books including Why Lincoln Matters.  Given the outcome of the 1994 gubernatorial election, one can't help but think he missed his moment in 1992, when he could have very much won the Democratic nomination.  Just the same, Mario Cuomo will certainly be remembered.

Comments

  1. Good guy who was well liked by folks from both parties. He loved NY and, truth be told, had no business even thinking of running for national office. I'm glad he stayed home.

    ReplyDelete
  2. He was one of my favorites. I coudn't understand his losing to empty suit Pataki for governor, but some of the folks were convinced that there should be "change."

    ReplyDelete
  3. It was too bad that he disappeared from the national scene after his loss in 1994. He was one of the most intelligent politicians we have had and really missed his perspective. Seems he was content to let Andrew carry his mantle.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

O Pioneers!

It is hard not to think of Nebraska without thinking of its greatest writer.  Here is a marvelous piece by Capote, Remembering Willa Cather . I remember seeing a stage production of O Pioneers! and being deeply moved by its raw emotions.  I had read My Antonia before, and soon found myself hooked, like Capote was by the simple elegance of her prose and the way she was able to evoke so many feelings through her characters.  Much of it came from the fact that she had lived those experiences herself. Her father dragged the family from Virginia to Nebraska in 1883, when it was still a young state, settling in the town of Red Cloud. named after one of the great Oglala chiefs.  Red Cloud was still alive at the time, living on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, in the aftermath of the "Great Sioux Wars" of 1876-77.  I don't know whether Cather took any interest in the famous chief, although it is hard to imagine not.  Upon his death in 1909, he was eulogi

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro

Colonel

Now with Colonel Roosevelt , the magnum opus is complete. And it deserves to stand as the definitive study of its restless, mutable, ever-boyish, erudite and tirelessly energetic subject. Mr. Morris has addressed the toughest and most frustrating part of Roosevelt’s life with the same care and precision that he brought to the two earlier installments. And if this story of a lifetime is his own life’s work, he has reason to be immensely proud.  -- Janet Maslin -- NY Times . Let the discussion begin!