Skip to main content

An Empire of Goods

By

I can't recommend Mr. Breen's The Marketplace of Revolution more heartily.  It is a bit slow going at first as he establishes the consumerist society that had developed in the colonies in the 1760s pointing to a number of fascinating colonial records, including those of thefts.  But, the narrative builds on these necessary elements to illustrate why the consumer boycotts over the Stamp and Townshend Acts were so effective.  The colonies had become Britains' prime outlet for its commercial goods and as Benjamin Franklin articulately pointed out to the British Parliament, Americans could either accept or reject these goods as it suited its growing political conscience.  The colonies gained huge moral victories in the repeal of these notorious acts.

Breen also explores the flipside of this, noting how oppressive the colonial non-importation movements became, especially in small towns.  Vendors, who understandably found their livelihood in great jeopardy, had little ground for appeal as communities banded together against British imports, calling vendors out who broke with the non-importation subscription lists, and tar and feathering them in some cases.  Although he doesn't delve too deeply into the religious roots of these movements, he does say that the strong sense of moral conviction carried with it many Biblical allusions.

What is fascinating to me is how much women became involved in these movements, either directly by signing subscription lists, joining spinning groups, and writing articles for newspapers; or indirectly by not buying goods they had long been accustomed to in support of colonial rights.  Breen spends a lot of time on this, noting the frustration many men felt in having to ally the "weaker sex," as these boycotts would have failed without their support.

Breen notes that it is hard to gauge how strong an impact these boycotts actually had on the commercial trade between Britain and the colonies, but their rhetorical effect is indisputable.  Parliament heeded Franklin's oratory, as well as complaints from vendors noting how adamant the colonial leaders were in having these notorious acts repealed.  Great reading!

Comments

  1. avrdsMarch 11, 2011 at 4:22 PM

    What a great review! I remember one book about that period -- probably Holton -- talking about how the boycotts definitely impacted people's lifestyles, particularly women's, and how that also kept the pressure on to do something.

    ReplyDelete
  2. James FergusonMarch 12, 2011 at 8:56 AM

    Thanks av. I think you would really enjoy this book. Lots to draw from.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

The People Debate the Constitution

By
As Pauline Maier describes in Ratification , there was no easy road in getting the Constitution ratified.  After 10 years of living together as a loosely knit confederation, a few forward thinking men decided that the Articles of Confederation no longer worked and it was time to forge a Constitution.  Washington would not go until he could be assured something would come of the convention and that there would be an august body of gentlemen to carry the changes through.  But, ultimately Maier describes it was the people who would determine the fate of the new Constitution. This is a reading group for Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution 1787-1788 .  The book has been well received by fellow historians like Jack Rakove , among others.  Maier has drawn from a wealth of research piecing together a story that tells the arduous battle in getting the Constitution ratified.  A battle no less significant than that Americans fought for independence.
166 comments
Read more