Skip to main content

An Empire of Goods

By

I can't recommend Mr. Breen's The Marketplace of Revolution more heartily.  It is a bit slow going at first as he establishes the consumerist society that had developed in the colonies in the 1760s pointing to a number of fascinating colonial records, including those of thefts.  But, the narrative builds on these necessary elements to illustrate why the consumer boycotts over the Stamp and Townshend Acts were so effective.  The colonies had become Britains' prime outlet for its commercial goods and as Benjamin Franklin articulately pointed out to the British Parliament, Americans could either accept or reject these goods as it suited its growing political conscience.  The colonies gained huge moral victories in the repeal of these notorious acts.

Breen also explores the flipside of this, noting how oppressive the colonial non-importation movements became, especially in small towns.  Vendors, who understandably found their livelihood in great jeopardy, had little ground for appeal as communities banded together against British imports, calling vendors out who broke with the non-importation subscription lists, and tar and feathering them in some cases.  Although he doesn't delve too deeply into the religious roots of these movements, he does say that the strong sense of moral conviction carried with it many Biblical allusions.

What is fascinating to me is how much women became involved in these movements, either directly by signing subscription lists, joining spinning groups, and writing articles for newspapers; or indirectly by not buying goods they had long been accustomed to in support of colonial rights.  Breen spends a lot of time on this, noting the frustration many men felt in having to ally the "weaker sex," as these boycotts would have failed without their support.

Breen notes that it is hard to gauge how strong an impact these boycotts actually had on the commercial trade between Britain and the colonies, but their rhetorical effect is indisputable.  Parliament heeded Franklin's oratory, as well as complaints from vendors noting how adamant the colonial leaders were in having these notorious acts repealed.  Great reading!

Comments

  1. avrdsMarch 11, 2011 at 4:22 PM

    What a great review! I remember one book about that period -- probably Holton -- talking about how the boycotts definitely impacted people's lifestyles, particularly women's, and how that also kept the pressure on to do something.

    ReplyDelete
  2. James FergusonMarch 12, 2011 at 8:56 AM

    Thanks av. I think you would really enjoy this book. Lots to draw from.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
228 comments
Read more

Dylan in America

By
Whoever it was in 1969 who named the very first Bob Dylan bootleg album “Great White Wonder” may have had a mischievous streak. There are any number of ways you can interpret the title — most boringly, the cover was blank, like the Beatles’ “White Album” — but I like to see a sly allusion to “Moby-Dick.” In the seven years since the release of his first commercial record, Dylan had become the white whale of 20th-century popular song, a wild, unconquerable and often baffling force of musical nature who drove fans and critics Ahab-mad in their efforts to spear him, lash him to the hull and render him merely comprehensible. --- Bruce Handy, NYTimes ____________________________________________ I figured we can start fresh with Bob Dylan.  Couldn't resist this photo of him striking a Woody Guthrie pose.  Looks like only yesterday.  Here is a link to the comments building up to this reading group.
182 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more