Skip to main content

A Political Meander

By

Comments

  1. avrdsApril 14, 2011 at 6:28 AM

    Maybe it's because I was expecting the worst -- in fact I didn't even watch it -- but that was some speech today:

    http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-cohn/86625/five-quick-thoughts-obamas-speech

    ReplyDelete
  2. James FergusonApril 14, 2011 at 6:39 AM

    It is so obvious that the massive tax cuts have been a huge burden on the government, especially with all the increased spending. I understand that he doesn't want to distance himself from the middle class, but maybe his approach should be that your $500 will be better spent in Washington than it would be distributed among the masses as a rebate check, naming the type of infrastructure improvements he has in mind, and the jobs they would create.

    Obama is too willing to compromise. He has to stick to his ground, especially in the bargaining phase.

    ReplyDelete
  3. avrdsApril 14, 2011 at 6:48 AM

    It would be great if this is the line in the sand. We'll see how America responds to it. It certainly gets me more enthusiastic about his reelection now, which I'm assuming was the idea. That it wasn't a speech about compromising gives me ... dare I say it ... a little hope?

    ReplyDelete
  4. James FergusonApril 14, 2011 at 9:32 AM

    As Cohn said, the middle class has to bear some of the brunt of these tax cuts as well. No point turning this even more into a "class war." But, given the current hostilities I can understand his desire to frame the tax increases the way he did, especially in the wake of GE getting off tax free.

    I don't see how a $500 rebate check does anymore than give a little blip in consumer spending. Those billions in middle class tax cuts which be much better spent helping to cover the deficit, if this is really everyone's "great concern."

    ReplyDelete
  5. James FergusonApril 15, 2011 at 10:51 AM

    Just when you thought it was safe to go back to Arizona,

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42602561/ns/politics-more_politics/?fb_ref=story_header%3Bstory_header&fb_source=home_oneline

    I can only hope that Jan Brewer has the good sense not to sign this "birther bill" into law.

    ReplyDelete
  6. avrdsApril 15, 2011 at 6:06 PM

    My chuckle for the day, re Obama inviting the GOP to his speech on Wednesday:


    Still, Republicans said, did Obama have to attack the men to their faces? “Reagan had the decency to insult his enemies when he was out of town,” grumbled one GOP aide.

    ReplyDelete
  7. avrdsApril 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM

    And here's a little good news from my part of the world (I love our governor):

    http://helenair.com/image_1c0f5dae-66ad-11e0-9e3f-001cc4c03286.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. James FergusonApril 15, 2011 at 8:59 PM

    I like his style!

    ReplyDelete
  9. James FergusonApril 15, 2011 at 9:32 PM

    Nice to see Obama firing back,

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/04/obama-uncensored.html

    too bad he doesn't say more of this in public.

    ReplyDelete
  10. avrdsApril 15, 2011 at 11:40 PM

    I think he suggested most of this in his speech, but nice to see it put so bluntly. As Carney says, there's nothing really embarrassing or even revealing in it -- except maybe to the republicans.

    ReplyDelete
  11. TripplerApril 18, 2011 at 6:23 AM

    Monday 4/18/11:

    BOSTON MARATHON!

    ReplyDelete
  12. James FergusonApril 18, 2011 at 11:26 AM

    The most telling aspect of the Republican agenda, is how they tried to slip Medicare and EPA cuts into the bill. Now they are attempting to take Medicare head on. This after admonishing the Obama health care bill for supposedly undercutting Medicare, and scaring senior citizens by saying the bill contained "death panels."

    I just wonder how long the GOP'ers can get away with playing both sides of the same coin? I would think that at some point the electorate would realize they are being played as fools by the GOP. It is abundantly clear that the GOP represents business and industrial interests, not that of "Joe the Plumber."

    ReplyDelete
  13. avrdsMay 1, 2011 at 6:02 AM

    Greetings from the L.A. Festival of Books. My panel with Tom Powers and Jim Newton went well -- so now I can get back to Triangle. Sorry it has taken me so long.

    ReplyDelete
  14. James FergusonMay 1, 2011 at 9:25 AM

    Look forward to your input.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Age of Roosevelt: The Crisis of the Old Order

By
A quarter of a century, however, is time enough to dispel some of the myths that have accumulated around the crisis of the early Thirties and the emergence of the New Deal. There is, for example, the myth that world conditions rather than domestic errors and extravagances were entirely responsible for the depression. There is the myth that the depression was already over, as a consequence of the ministrations of the Hoover Administration, and that it was the loss of confidence resulting from the election of Roosevelt that gave it new life. There is the myth that the roots of what was good in the New Deal were in the Hoover Administration - that Hoover had actually inaugurated the era of government responsibility for the health of the economy and the society. There is the contrasting myth (for myths do not require inner consistency) that the New Deal was alien in origins and in philosophy; that - as Mr. Hoover put it - its philosophy was "the same philosophy of government which...
170 comments
Read more