Skip to main content

The Trouble with Uncle Rudy



We all have one of those aging uncles who spouts off whatever damn fool notion comes into his head, but we protect him because he is part of the family.  That seems to be the case with Uncle Rudy, who offered up one of his most outrageous comments at a private GOP dinner in New York.  

It is hard to believe that 8 short years ago, Rudy Giuliani was being seriously considered as a presidential candidate.  Eric Schultz, deputy press secretary for the White House, said Giuliani floated a similar statement back in 2007, but it pretty much went under the radar screen.  Not this time.

It would be easy enough to excuse Uncle Rudy if he was in an old folks home, but he is still very much a part of the Republican establishment, called on to give speeches at fundraisers like this one.  For a brief moment, he was "America's mayor."  Health problems sidelined him from the US Senate race in 2000, but the attention he received following 911 made him a national celebrity.  He eventually stepped down as mayor, defeated his prostate cancer and became a regular at Fox News, where he is free to say pretty much whatever pops into his head without any questions asked.  However, you know Uncle Rudy has to ask himself over and over again what might have been had he run against Hillary Clinton in 2000 and won.

The network has formed a protective circle around him, as has the GOP in general.  But, you can bet if any Democrat had questioned George W. Bush's patriotism, he (or she) would have been unmercifully skewered.  Instead, Fox Nation features the epic rant on its website, boasting of how Uncle Rudy "destroyed" Obama.

It seems "love" is an unquestioning support of "American exceptionalism," and the Judeo-Christian values it is purportedly based upon.  This has become a "holy trinity" for the GOP, with Mike Huckabee recently launching a very similar attack against Obama for not standing up for Jews, Christians and America.

The "birther" argument may have faded into the background, but Republicans still don't consider Obama a true blue American.  This latest round of Obama bashing comes on the heels of the remarks he made at the National Prayer Breakfast.  Also underlying these latest vitriolic attacks is the White House reaction to Netanyahu's upcoming speech before a joint session of Congress.

In the addled minds of Uncle Rudy and Huck, Obama doesn't stand up for Judeo-Christian-American values. Rather, he apologizes for our past transgressions.  A big no-no, especially when confronting such a repugnant evil as the Islamic State (IS).  Lost in all this overblown rhetoric is that the Obama administration has asked Congress for a war powers resolution to fight IS, albeit limited to air strikes, and that the White House has not abandoned Israel in any way shape or form.  Just ask the Palestinians, who have repeatedly had their UN bid for statehood squashed by an American veto.

It is much easier to paint Obama as a closet Muslim who doesn't have the best interests of the United States in mind than it is to deal with the harsh realities of events unfolding around the world in any meaningful way.

The reason why Uncle Rudy is not being chastised by the conservative press is because it stands behind everything he says.  To them, Obama remains an outsider, living in "Bubbleville," as Uncle Huck calls it, unable to understand, much less embrace, the true meaning of patriotism and faith that they firmly believe underlies this country.  You have to ask yourself, who is living in a "bubble?"


Comments

  1. In this amusing piece, Fox tries to draw comparison between a comment candidate Obama made in regard to Bush in 2008 with Uncle Rudy's epic rant against Obama in 2015,

    http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/02/21/ed-henry-presses-josh-earnest-does-obama-regret-calling-george-w-bush-unpatriotic

    I'm sure Fox was pretty harsh on candidate Obama, but has circled its wagons around Giuliani. So, where's the double standard?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...

Team of Rivals Reading Group

''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005

The Searchers

You are invited to join us in a discussion of  The Searchers , a new book on John Ford's boldest Western, which cast John Wayne against type as the vengeful Ethan Edwards who spends eight years tracking down a notorious Comanche warrior, who had killed his cousins and abducted a 9 year old girl.  The film has had its fair share of detractors as well as fans over the years, but is consistently ranked in most critics'  Top Ten Greatest Films . Glenn Frankel examines the origins of the story as well as the film itself, breaking his book down into four parts.  The first two parts deal with Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, perhaps the most famous of the 19th century abduction stories.  The short third part focuses on the author of the novel, Alan Le May, and how he came to write The Searchers. The final part is about Pappy and the Duke and the making of the film. Frankel noted that Le May researched 60+ abduction stories, fusing them together into a nar...