Skip to main content

Marco's vendetta

By



Maybe Marco Rubio is just feeling his oats after a strong third-place finish in Iowa, but you really have to wonder what he gains by viciously attacking Obama's speech to an Islamic mosque in Baltimore.  It wasn't like the President said anything untoward Marco personally or in anyway singled him out.  Obama made a general statement about "the inexcusable political rhetoric against Muslim-Americans," but mostly the speech was about making Muslim-Americans feel at home in America.

It is clear from Rubio's comments and those of other Republicans on the campaign trail that they didn't listen to the speech or even bothered to read a transcript, if they can't stand to hear's the President's voice.  For anyone who did listen, it was a very good speech.  Hugh Hewitt said so himself during a radio interview with Jeb Bush, not that Jeb bothered to tune in, as he made only abstract comments.  Jeb was quick to point out that his brother gave a similar speech much earlier in his tenure, so there Barack!

Sadly, the GOP campaign trail has reached a level of petulance that is truly hard to comprehend.  Was it really any skin off any of their noses that Obama chose to address the Muslim-American community?  He offered empathy but at the same time challenged the congregation to work with police to root out radical Islamic elements in their midst.   For the most part, he praised Muslim-Americans' role in society.  He told how our Constitution was written to protect all religious faiths, not just the Christian faith.  He noted Jefferson even being accused of being a closet Muslim, which drew laughs from the audience.  It was a very well measured speech that covered a broad range of topics told in a soft spoken manner to stir as little indignation as possible.

Yet, Marco was having none of it.  To him, the President continues to "divide the nation," sounding the nauseating theme that has run through the GOP campaign trail from last May, as if they are still running against Obama.  It really makes you wonder what grudge Marco harbors against Obama, since he is the most vociferous in attacking the President on every single issue and every single thing he says.

Throughout the President's 40-minute speech, Obama stressed unity not division.  At one point, he said an act of terror committed against anyone in this nation is committed against us all.  He noted the past divisions in this country when it came to civil rights, but struck a hopeful tone in that we can overcome these differences, echoing the words of Martin Luther King, Jr.

Maybe Marco didn't like the President's religious references, especially when Obama noted that we are all descended from Abraham -- Christian, Jew and Muslim alike.  I think a lot of Christians are under the false impression that Islam is a whole separate religion, failing to grasp that like Christianity it uses the Old Testament as its base text.  Allah and God are one in the same.   But, the Rubio camp refused to comment when asked if the Florida senator had seen the speech.



This doesn't explain the animosity Rubio harbors toward the President.  The only thing I can think of is that it stems back to the White House attempt to broker a compromise on a Congressional Immigration Reform Bill.  Rubio was part of the Gang of Eight, and he was afraid this might become the kiss of death to his political ambitions if he didn't distance himself as far as possible from the President.  God forbid he got a hug like Charlie Crist, which allowed Marco to sweep the governor out of the Florida Senate race in 2010.  Whatever the case, Marco needs to tone down his rhetoric, unless he ends up looking like Scarface.

Comments

  1. Rick DiguetteFebruary 7, 2016 at 5:56 PM

    We can't expect any of these morons to say much of anything resembling the truth, especially if it could be interpreted as favorable to the President.

    ReplyDelete
  2. James FergusonFebruary 7, 2016 at 6:32 PM

    So it seems, but I would think it is better to say nothing than stick your foot in your mouth as Marco Rubio so often does.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rick DiguetteFebruary 9, 2016 at 8:48 PM

      That's at least one difference between you and them. You actually think.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

By
  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, not...
230 comments
Read more

Team of Rivals Reading Group

By
''Team of Rivals" is also an America ''coming-of-age" saga. Lincoln, Seward, Chase et al. are sketched as being part of a ''restless generation," born when Founding Fathers occupied the White House and the Louisiana Purchase netted nearly 530 million new acres to be explored. The Western Expansion motto of this burgeoning generation, in fact, was cleverly captured in two lines of Stephen Vincent Benet's verse: ''The stream uncrossed, the promise still untried / The metal sleeping in the mountainside." None of the protagonists in ''Team of Rivals" hailed from the Deep South or Great Plains. _______________________________ From a review by Douglas Brinkley, 2005
293 comments
Read more

The Searchers

By
You are invited to join us in a discussion of  The Searchers , a new book on John Ford's boldest Western, which cast John Wayne against type as the vengeful Ethan Edwards who spends eight years tracking down a notorious Comanche warrior, who had killed his cousins and abducted a 9 year old girl.  The film has had its fair share of detractors as well as fans over the years, but is consistently ranked in most critics'  Top Ten Greatest Films . Glenn Frankel examines the origins of the story as well as the film itself, breaking his book down into four parts.  The first two parts deal with Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, perhaps the most famous of the 19th century abduction stories.  The short third part focuses on the author of the novel, Alan Le May, and how he came to write The Searchers. The final part is about Pappy and the Duke and the making of the film. Frankel noted that Le May researched 60+ abduction stories, fusing them together into a nar...
123 comments
Read more